可持续众筹:驾驭技术契合度和安全风险

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Rachel Chua, Min Wu, Kum Fai Yuen
{"title":"可持续众筹:驾驭技术契合度和安全风险","authors":"Rachel Chua,&nbsp;Min Wu,&nbsp;Kum Fai Yuen","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>‘Crowdshipping’ (CS), a burgeoning trend propelled by the upsurge in e-commerce after the COVID-19 pandemic, combines crowdsourcing and shipping, giving rise to a novel logistical paradigm. While shipping entails the physical transportation of goods, crowdsourcing involves task delegation to a network of individuals through an open call. This departure from conventional courier services for last-mile delivery leverages the collective potential of the online public. Using the health belief model and task–technology fit (TTF) theory, this study introduces a theoretical model that delves into the fundamental factors influencing consumer acceptance of CS as a last-mile delivery service within urban landscapes, encompassing its technological alignment. A comprehensive analysis of 450 survey responses, using structural equation modelling, revealed that expected outcome, self-efficacy, perceived threat (security and privacy) and cues to action directly influence consumers acceptance. Contrarily, task and technology characteristics can indirectly influence consumer acceptance through TTF. Analysis of the total effects revealed that cues to action have the strongest impact on consumer acceptance. The study aimed to illuminate consumer perspectives regarding the integration of CS as a last-mile delivery alternative and to enrich urban green logistical planning and regulatory frameworks for policymakers accordingly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102832"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable crowdshipping: Navigating technological fit and security risks\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Chua,&nbsp;Min Wu,&nbsp;Kum Fai Yuen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>‘Crowdshipping’ (CS), a burgeoning trend propelled by the upsurge in e-commerce after the COVID-19 pandemic, combines crowdsourcing and shipping, giving rise to a novel logistical paradigm. While shipping entails the physical transportation of goods, crowdsourcing involves task delegation to a network of individuals through an open call. This departure from conventional courier services for last-mile delivery leverages the collective potential of the online public. Using the health belief model and task–technology fit (TTF) theory, this study introduces a theoretical model that delves into the fundamental factors influencing consumer acceptance of CS as a last-mile delivery service within urban landscapes, encompassing its technological alignment. A comprehensive analysis of 450 survey responses, using structural equation modelling, revealed that expected outcome, self-efficacy, perceived threat (security and privacy) and cues to action directly influence consumers acceptance. Contrarily, task and technology characteristics can indirectly influence consumer acceptance through TTF. Analysis of the total effects revealed that cues to action have the strongest impact on consumer acceptance. The study aimed to illuminate consumer perspectives regarding the integration of CS as a last-mile delivery alternative and to enrich urban green logistical planning and regulatory frameworks for policymakers accordingly.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000223\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“众包”是新冠疫情后电子商务热潮推动的新兴趋势,它将众包和航运结合起来,形成了一种新的物流模式。航运需要货物的实物运输,而众包则是通过公开征集将任务委派给个人网络。这种与传统快递服务的“最后一英里”递送的不同,利用了在线公众的集体潜力。利用健康信念模型和任务-技术契合(TTF)理论,本研究引入了一个理论模型,该模型深入研究了影响消费者接受CS作为城市景观中最后一英里交付服务的基本因素,包括其技术一致性。利用结构方程模型对450份调查回复进行了全面分析,发现预期结果、自我效能、感知威胁(安全和隐私)和行动线索直接影响消费者的接受程度。相反,任务和技术特征可以通过TTF间接影响消费者的接受度。对总效应的分析表明,行动线索对消费者接受度的影响最大。该研究旨在阐明消费者对CS作为最后一英里交付替代方案的整合的看法,并相应地丰富城市绿色物流规划和政策制定者的监管框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainable crowdshipping: Navigating technological fit and security risks
‘Crowdshipping’ (CS), a burgeoning trend propelled by the upsurge in e-commerce after the COVID-19 pandemic, combines crowdsourcing and shipping, giving rise to a novel logistical paradigm. While shipping entails the physical transportation of goods, crowdsourcing involves task delegation to a network of individuals through an open call. This departure from conventional courier services for last-mile delivery leverages the collective potential of the online public. Using the health belief model and task–technology fit (TTF) theory, this study introduces a theoretical model that delves into the fundamental factors influencing consumer acceptance of CS as a last-mile delivery service within urban landscapes, encompassing its technological alignment. A comprehensive analysis of 450 survey responses, using structural equation modelling, revealed that expected outcome, self-efficacy, perceived threat (security and privacy) and cues to action directly influence consumers acceptance. Contrarily, task and technology characteristics can indirectly influence consumer acceptance through TTF. Analysis of the total effects revealed that cues to action have the strongest impact on consumer acceptance. The study aimed to illuminate consumer perspectives regarding the integration of CS as a last-mile delivery alternative and to enrich urban green logistical planning and regulatory frameworks for policymakers accordingly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信