小儿腹部肿瘤切除术硬膜外镇痛早期拔除留置导尿管

Shachi Srivatsa , Jennifer H. Aldrink , Dana Schwartz , Grant Heydinger , Andrew Davidoff , Andrew J. Murphy , Kyle O. Rove , Sara A. Mansfield
{"title":"小儿腹部肿瘤切除术硬膜外镇痛早期拔除留置导尿管","authors":"Shachi Srivatsa ,&nbsp;Jennifer H. Aldrink ,&nbsp;Dana Schwartz ,&nbsp;Grant Heydinger ,&nbsp;Andrew Davidoff ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Murphy ,&nbsp;Kyle O. Rove ,&nbsp;Sara A. Mansfield","doi":"10.1016/j.yjpso.2024.100191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Epidural analgesia (EA) is commonly employed for postoperative pain management in children undergoing abdominal tumor resection. Indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) often remain for the duration of EA administration due to concern for associated urinary retention. This study focuses on children undergoing abdominal tumor resection with appropriate EA coverage, to assess whether IUC can be removed early with minimal risk of reinsertion for urinary retention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of children who underwent abdominal tumor resections with EA between 2015 and 2023 at two institutions was conducted. Data were summarized, and rates of postoperative urinary retention requiring catheter reinsertion and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) were compared between patients with early and late IUC removal groups using Fisher's exact testing. “Early” was defined as IUC removal with EA in place and “late” as IUC removal after or concurrent with EA discontinuation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 228 children underwent abdominal tumor resections with EA. Of these, 104 had early, and 124 had late IUC removal. The average postoperative day (POD) of IUC removal in the early group was 1.1±0.5 days and 2.9±1.1 days in the late group. EA was at T12 level or higher in 101 patients (97.1 %) in the early group, and 68 (54.8 %) in the late group (p&lt;0.001). EA contained opioids in 27 (26.0 %) in the early group and 54 (43.5 %) in the late group (p=0.005). There were 6 (5.8 %) children in the early group and 1 (0.8 %) in the late group requiring re-catheterization (p = 0.049). For those requiring re-catheterization, the EA level was T7-8 in 5 patients, T10-11 in 1 patient, and T4 in 1 patient (late). There was 1 (1.0 %) patient with a CAUTI in the early group, and 3 (2.4 %) patients in the late group (p = 0.63).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Early removal of indwelling urinary catheters in the setting of thoracic epidural analgesia is associated with a small risk of urinary retention necessitating catheter re-insertion. Balancing the need for IUCs with this possibility, patient comfort, and infectious risk should inform decision-making to best align with enhanced recovery efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early removal of indwelling urinary catheters in children undergoing abdominal tumor resection with epidural analgesia\",\"authors\":\"Shachi Srivatsa ,&nbsp;Jennifer H. Aldrink ,&nbsp;Dana Schwartz ,&nbsp;Grant Heydinger ,&nbsp;Andrew Davidoff ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Murphy ,&nbsp;Kyle O. Rove ,&nbsp;Sara A. Mansfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yjpso.2024.100191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Epidural analgesia (EA) is commonly employed for postoperative pain management in children undergoing abdominal tumor resection. Indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) often remain for the duration of EA administration due to concern for associated urinary retention. This study focuses on children undergoing abdominal tumor resection with appropriate EA coverage, to assess whether IUC can be removed early with minimal risk of reinsertion for urinary retention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of children who underwent abdominal tumor resections with EA between 2015 and 2023 at two institutions was conducted. Data were summarized, and rates of postoperative urinary retention requiring catheter reinsertion and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) were compared between patients with early and late IUC removal groups using Fisher's exact testing. “Early” was defined as IUC removal with EA in place and “late” as IUC removal after or concurrent with EA discontinuation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 228 children underwent abdominal tumor resections with EA. Of these, 104 had early, and 124 had late IUC removal. The average postoperative day (POD) of IUC removal in the early group was 1.1±0.5 days and 2.9±1.1 days in the late group. EA was at T12 level or higher in 101 patients (97.1 %) in the early group, and 68 (54.8 %) in the late group (p&lt;0.001). EA contained opioids in 27 (26.0 %) in the early group and 54 (43.5 %) in the late group (p=0.005). There were 6 (5.8 %) children in the early group and 1 (0.8 %) in the late group requiring re-catheterization (p = 0.049). For those requiring re-catheterization, the EA level was T7-8 in 5 patients, T10-11 in 1 patient, and T4 in 1 patient (late). There was 1 (1.0 %) patient with a CAUTI in the early group, and 3 (2.4 %) patients in the late group (p = 0.63).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Early removal of indwelling urinary catheters in the setting of thoracic epidural analgesia is associated with a small risk of urinary retention necessitating catheter re-insertion. Balancing the need for IUCs with this possibility, patient comfort, and infectious risk should inform decision-making to best align with enhanced recovery efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的硬膜外镇痛(EA)是儿童腹部肿瘤切除术后常见的镇痛方法。由于担心尿潴留,留置导尿管(IUCs)通常在EA给药期间保留。本研究的重点是接受腹部肿瘤切除术并进行适当EA覆盖的儿童,以评估是否可以在早期切除IUC并将尿潴留重新插入的风险降到最低。方法回顾性分析2015年至2023年在两所医院接受腹腔肿瘤切除术的儿童。总结数据,并使用Fisher精确测试比较早期和晚期IUC取出组患者术后需要重新插入导尿管的尿潴留率和导尿管相关性尿路感染(CAUTIs)。“早期”定义为在EA到位的情况下取出IUC,“晚期”定义为在EA停止后或同时取出IUC。结果228例患儿行腹腔肿瘤切除术,其中早期104例,晚期124例。早期组IUC取出的平均术后天数(POD)为1.1±0.5 d,晚期组为2.9±1.1 d。早期组有101例(97.1%)患者EA达到T12或更高,晚期组有68例(54.8%)患者EA达到T12或更高(p < 0.001)。早期组有27例(26.0%),晚期组有54例(43.5%),差异有统计学意义(p=0.005)。早期组患儿6例(5.8%),晚期组患儿1例(0.8%)需要再次置管(p = 0.049)。对于需要重新置管的患者,EA水平为T7-8 5例,T10-11 1例,T4 1例(晚期)。早期组有1例(1.0%)出现CAUTI,晚期组有3例(2.4%)出现CAUTI (p = 0.63)。结论在胸段硬膜外镇痛时,早期拔除留置导尿管可降低再次留置导尿管的尿潴留风险。平衡对IUCs的需求与这种可能性、患者舒适度和感染风险,应该为决策提供信息,以最佳地配合加强的恢复工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early removal of indwelling urinary catheters in children undergoing abdominal tumor resection with epidural analgesia

Purpose

Epidural analgesia (EA) is commonly employed for postoperative pain management in children undergoing abdominal tumor resection. Indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) often remain for the duration of EA administration due to concern for associated urinary retention. This study focuses on children undergoing abdominal tumor resection with appropriate EA coverage, to assess whether IUC can be removed early with minimal risk of reinsertion for urinary retention.

Methods

A retrospective review of children who underwent abdominal tumor resections with EA between 2015 and 2023 at two institutions was conducted. Data were summarized, and rates of postoperative urinary retention requiring catheter reinsertion and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) were compared between patients with early and late IUC removal groups using Fisher's exact testing. “Early” was defined as IUC removal with EA in place and “late” as IUC removal after or concurrent with EA discontinuation.

Results

A total of 228 children underwent abdominal tumor resections with EA. Of these, 104 had early, and 124 had late IUC removal. The average postoperative day (POD) of IUC removal in the early group was 1.1±0.5 days and 2.9±1.1 days in the late group. EA was at T12 level or higher in 101 patients (97.1 %) in the early group, and 68 (54.8 %) in the late group (p<0.001). EA contained opioids in 27 (26.0 %) in the early group and 54 (43.5 %) in the late group (p=0.005). There were 6 (5.8 %) children in the early group and 1 (0.8 %) in the late group requiring re-catheterization (p = 0.049). For those requiring re-catheterization, the EA level was T7-8 in 5 patients, T10-11 in 1 patient, and T4 in 1 patient (late). There was 1 (1.0 %) patient with a CAUTI in the early group, and 3 (2.4 %) patients in the late group (p = 0.63).

Conclusions

Early removal of indwelling urinary catheters in the setting of thoracic epidural analgesia is associated with a small risk of urinary retention necessitating catheter re-insertion. Balancing the need for IUCs with this possibility, patient comfort, and infectious risk should inform decision-making to best align with enhanced recovery efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信