综合野外样地和航空遥感数据以加强阿拉斯加内陆北方森林的国家森林清查制图

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Pratima Khatri-Chhetri , Hans-Erik Andersen , Bruce Cook , Sean M. Hendryx , Liz van Wagtendonk , Van R. Kane
{"title":"综合野外样地和航空遥感数据以加强阿拉斯加内陆北方森林的国家森林清查制图","authors":"Pratima Khatri-Chhetri ,&nbsp;Hans-Erik Andersen ,&nbsp;Bruce Cook ,&nbsp;Sean M. Hendryx ,&nbsp;Liz van Wagtendonk ,&nbsp;Van R. Kane","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The boreal biome, the largest terrestrial biome on Earth, is increasingly vulnerable to climate change due to warming twice as rapidly as the global average. Climate change has increased the temperature, frequency, severity, and amount of area burned, which is leading to changes in the spatial extent of forest type and species range. These rapid ecological shifts necessitate fine-scale monitoring of forest type to detect potential type conversions and guide management interventions. In this study, we present a framework for forest type classification combining field plots and high-resolution remote sensing data using machine learning models in the boreal forest of Interior Alaska. For this purpose, we conducted forest type classification at three different levels, including 1. forest and nonforest, 2. hardwood, softwood, and nonforest, and 3. three dominant forest types, including paper birch, black spruce, white spruce, and nonforest. To achieve this goal, we compared the performance of two advanced modeling approaches, the convolutional neural network (CNN) and the XGBoost model. Our datasets included field and high-resolution topographic metrics including elevation, slope, aspect, and solar radiation and canopy height derived from lidar (1 m) and 44 vegetation indices derived from high-resolution (1 m) visible to near infrared (VNIR) hyperspectral data collected by NASA Goddard's Lidar, Hyperspectral and Thermal Imager (G-LiHT) sensor. The remote sensing data were collected under variable sky conditions (clear to overcast) throughout a 1-month growing-season period, and field data collected by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis program (FIA). In this framework, we also studied the importance of topographic and remote sensing variables for the classification of forest types. We found the CNN model outperformed the XGBoost model in terms of overall accuracy and a macro average F1 score for all three different forest type classifications. The CNN model achieved an overall accuracy of 93.1% for forest or nonforest, 82.6% for hardwood, softwood, and nonforest, and 74.7% for three dominant forest types including paper birch, black spruce, and white spruce along with nonforest. Among the various topographic factors, we found that elevation was the most important factor for discriminating all forest types. In addition, we found that canopy height and vegetation indices including Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI) (R531 &amp; R570), Pigment Specific Normalized Difference (PSND) (R635 &amp; R800), and Gitelson and Merzlyak (GM1) (R550 &amp; R750) were important for differentiating between hardwood and softwood while Anthocyanin Reflectance Index (ARI1) (R550 &amp; R700) was important for differentiating between forest and nonforest. The high-resolution forest type information can improve our ecological understanding of boreal forest dynamics, estimate above ground biomass, and carbon, and support the national forest inventory and forest managers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100192"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthesizing field plot and airborne remote sensing data to enhance national forest inventory mapping in the boreal forest of Interior Alaska\",\"authors\":\"Pratima Khatri-Chhetri ,&nbsp;Hans-Erik Andersen ,&nbsp;Bruce Cook ,&nbsp;Sean M. Hendryx ,&nbsp;Liz van Wagtendonk ,&nbsp;Van R. Kane\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The boreal biome, the largest terrestrial biome on Earth, is increasingly vulnerable to climate change due to warming twice as rapidly as the global average. Climate change has increased the temperature, frequency, severity, and amount of area burned, which is leading to changes in the spatial extent of forest type and species range. These rapid ecological shifts necessitate fine-scale monitoring of forest type to detect potential type conversions and guide management interventions. In this study, we present a framework for forest type classification combining field plots and high-resolution remote sensing data using machine learning models in the boreal forest of Interior Alaska. For this purpose, we conducted forest type classification at three different levels, including 1. forest and nonforest, 2. hardwood, softwood, and nonforest, and 3. three dominant forest types, including paper birch, black spruce, white spruce, and nonforest. To achieve this goal, we compared the performance of two advanced modeling approaches, the convolutional neural network (CNN) and the XGBoost model. Our datasets included field and high-resolution topographic metrics including elevation, slope, aspect, and solar radiation and canopy height derived from lidar (1 m) and 44 vegetation indices derived from high-resolution (1 m) visible to near infrared (VNIR) hyperspectral data collected by NASA Goddard's Lidar, Hyperspectral and Thermal Imager (G-LiHT) sensor. The remote sensing data were collected under variable sky conditions (clear to overcast) throughout a 1-month growing-season period, and field data collected by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis program (FIA). In this framework, we also studied the importance of topographic and remote sensing variables for the classification of forest types. We found the CNN model outperformed the XGBoost model in terms of overall accuracy and a macro average F1 score for all three different forest type classifications. The CNN model achieved an overall accuracy of 93.1% for forest or nonforest, 82.6% for hardwood, softwood, and nonforest, and 74.7% for three dominant forest types including paper birch, black spruce, and white spruce along with nonforest. Among the various topographic factors, we found that elevation was the most important factor for discriminating all forest types. In addition, we found that canopy height and vegetation indices including Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI) (R531 &amp; R570), Pigment Specific Normalized Difference (PSND) (R635 &amp; R800), and Gitelson and Merzlyak (GM1) (R550 &amp; R750) were important for differentiating between hardwood and softwood while Anthocyanin Reflectance Index (ARI1) (R550 &amp; R700) was important for differentiating between forest and nonforest. The high-resolution forest type information can improve our ecological understanding of boreal forest dynamics, estimate above ground biomass, and carbon, and support the national forest inventory and forest managers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

北方生物群落是地球上最大的陆地生物群落,由于变暖速度是全球平均速度的两倍,它越来越容易受到气候变化的影响。气候变化增加了森林燃烧的温度、频率、严重程度和面积,导致森林类型和物种范围的空间范围发生变化。这些快速的生态变化需要对森林类型进行精细监测,以发现潜在的类型转换并指导管理干预措施。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个结合野外样地和高分辨率遥感数据的森林类型分类框架,利用机器学习模型在阿拉斯加内陆的北方森林中进行分类。为此,我们在三个不同的层次上进行了森林类型分类,包括1。2.森林和非森林;硬木、软木和非森林木材;三种主要的森林类型,包括纸桦树、黑云杉、白云杉和非森林。为了实现这一目标,我们比较了卷积神经网络(CNN)和XGBoost模型这两种高级建模方法的性能。我们的数据集包括野外和高分辨率地形指标,包括海拔、坡度、坡向、太阳辐射和冠层高度,这些指标来自激光雷达(1米),以及44个植被指数,这些指数来自高分辨率(1米)的可见光到近红外(VNIR)高光谱数据,这些数据来自美国宇航局戈达德激光雷达、高光谱和热成像仪(g - light)传感器收集的数据。遥感数据是在1个月的生长期不同的天空条件(晴天到阴天)下收集的,现场数据由美国农业部林业局森林清查和分析项目(FIA)收集。在此框架下,我们还研究了地形和遥感变量对森林类型分类的重要性。我们发现CNN模型在所有三种不同森林类型分类的总体精度和宏观平均F1分数方面优于XGBoost模型。CNN模型对森林或非森林的总体准确率为93.1%,对硬木、软木和非森林的总体准确率为82.6%,对三种主要森林类型(包括纸桦树、黑云杉和白云杉以及非森林)的总体准确率为74.7%。在各种地形因子中,海拔高度是判别所有森林类型的最重要因子。此外,我们发现冠层高度和植被指数包括光化学反射率指数(PRI) (R531 &;R570),颜料特异性归一化差(PSND) (R635 &;R800)和Gitelson & Merzlyak (GM1) (R550 &;R750)是区分硬木和软木的重要指标,而花青素反射指数(R550 &;R700)对区分森林和非森林很重要。高分辨率森林类型信息可以提高我们对北方森林动态的生态学认识,估算地上生物量和碳,并为国家森林清查和森林管理者提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Synthesizing field plot and airborne remote sensing data to enhance national forest inventory mapping in the boreal forest of Interior Alaska

Synthesizing field plot and airborne remote sensing data to enhance national forest inventory mapping in the boreal forest of Interior Alaska
The boreal biome, the largest terrestrial biome on Earth, is increasingly vulnerable to climate change due to warming twice as rapidly as the global average. Climate change has increased the temperature, frequency, severity, and amount of area burned, which is leading to changes in the spatial extent of forest type and species range. These rapid ecological shifts necessitate fine-scale monitoring of forest type to detect potential type conversions and guide management interventions. In this study, we present a framework for forest type classification combining field plots and high-resolution remote sensing data using machine learning models in the boreal forest of Interior Alaska. For this purpose, we conducted forest type classification at three different levels, including 1. forest and nonforest, 2. hardwood, softwood, and nonforest, and 3. three dominant forest types, including paper birch, black spruce, white spruce, and nonforest. To achieve this goal, we compared the performance of two advanced modeling approaches, the convolutional neural network (CNN) and the XGBoost model. Our datasets included field and high-resolution topographic metrics including elevation, slope, aspect, and solar radiation and canopy height derived from lidar (1 m) and 44 vegetation indices derived from high-resolution (1 m) visible to near infrared (VNIR) hyperspectral data collected by NASA Goddard's Lidar, Hyperspectral and Thermal Imager (G-LiHT) sensor. The remote sensing data were collected under variable sky conditions (clear to overcast) throughout a 1-month growing-season period, and field data collected by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis program (FIA). In this framework, we also studied the importance of topographic and remote sensing variables for the classification of forest types. We found the CNN model outperformed the XGBoost model in terms of overall accuracy and a macro average F1 score for all three different forest type classifications. The CNN model achieved an overall accuracy of 93.1% for forest or nonforest, 82.6% for hardwood, softwood, and nonforest, and 74.7% for three dominant forest types including paper birch, black spruce, and white spruce along with nonforest. Among the various topographic factors, we found that elevation was the most important factor for discriminating all forest types. In addition, we found that canopy height and vegetation indices including Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI) (R531 & R570), Pigment Specific Normalized Difference (PSND) (R635 & R800), and Gitelson and Merzlyak (GM1) (R550 & R750) were important for differentiating between hardwood and softwood while Anthocyanin Reflectance Index (ARI1) (R550 & R700) was important for differentiating between forest and nonforest. The high-resolution forest type information can improve our ecological understanding of boreal forest dynamics, estimate above ground biomass, and carbon, and support the national forest inventory and forest managers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信