无障碍规划:在中期发展规划中被忽视或缺失?加纳52个不同城市的政策方向目录

Justice P. Tuffour , Jones Adu-Mensah , Tracy Morrison , Ransmond Opoku Berchie
{"title":"无障碍规划:在中期发展规划中被忽视或缺失?加纳52个不同城市的政策方向目录","authors":"Justice P. Tuffour ,&nbsp;Jones Adu-Mensah ,&nbsp;Tracy Morrison ,&nbsp;Ransmond Opoku Berchie","doi":"10.1016/j.aftran.2024.100015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metrics for cataloging regional transportation planning success are quickly evolving from the business-as-usual mobility measures like roadway level of service towards more sustainable accessibility indicators. Indicators that connect people to opportunities. While this conventional shift gains momentum in modern planning, the exhibition of accessibility planning strategies appear to be a hit-or-miss endeavor – either supplanted by the age-old \"build first, make amends later\" paradigm or vaguely referenced in policy documents. This rhetoric of mobility <em>versus</em> accessibility-centered planning <em>(which we call AVM orientation)</em> and its application often grapples with uncertainties and remains inconsistent in many developing regions, limiting a clearer understanding of their current planning orientation. Our paper addresses this gap by using normalized accessibility score indexing to capture the orientation and integration of accessibility planning for 52 diverse municipalities in Ghana. By syllogizing data from the most recent medium-term development plans of selected Metropolitan, Municipal, and District assemblies (MMDAs) nationwide and the National Transportation Policy framework, the study examines the current planning orientations, gaps in performance measures, and policy directions for adopting more sustainable metrics. We find that development planning only loosely acknowledges the principles of accessibility planning, often using performance metrics incongruent with conventional sustainable outcomes. Less than a third of MTDPs include any land use and transportation integration measures, and fewer still account for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reduction. Among the MMDAs that capture accessibility goals, development strategies still prioritize road infrastructure expansion, especially evident in small-sized Districts where the underdeveloped transportation network necessitates these prerequisite measures. The paper discusses implications for planning policy and practice while offering recommendations for bridging the crossroads for accessibility in long-range development planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100058,"journal":{"name":"African Transport Studies","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessibility planning: Overlooked or absent by design in medium-term development plans? A catalog of the policy orientations for 52 diverse municipalities in Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Justice P. Tuffour ,&nbsp;Jones Adu-Mensah ,&nbsp;Tracy Morrison ,&nbsp;Ransmond Opoku Berchie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aftran.2024.100015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Metrics for cataloging regional transportation planning success are quickly evolving from the business-as-usual mobility measures like roadway level of service towards more sustainable accessibility indicators. Indicators that connect people to opportunities. While this conventional shift gains momentum in modern planning, the exhibition of accessibility planning strategies appear to be a hit-or-miss endeavor – either supplanted by the age-old \\\"build first, make amends later\\\" paradigm or vaguely referenced in policy documents. This rhetoric of mobility <em>versus</em> accessibility-centered planning <em>(which we call AVM orientation)</em> and its application often grapples with uncertainties and remains inconsistent in many developing regions, limiting a clearer understanding of their current planning orientation. Our paper addresses this gap by using normalized accessibility score indexing to capture the orientation and integration of accessibility planning for 52 diverse municipalities in Ghana. By syllogizing data from the most recent medium-term development plans of selected Metropolitan, Municipal, and District assemblies (MMDAs) nationwide and the National Transportation Policy framework, the study examines the current planning orientations, gaps in performance measures, and policy directions for adopting more sustainable metrics. We find that development planning only loosely acknowledges the principles of accessibility planning, often using performance metrics incongruent with conventional sustainable outcomes. Less than a third of MTDPs include any land use and transportation integration measures, and fewer still account for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reduction. Among the MMDAs that capture accessibility goals, development strategies still prioritize road infrastructure expansion, especially evident in small-sized Districts where the underdeveloped transportation network necessitates these prerequisite measures. The paper discusses implications for planning policy and practice while offering recommendations for bridging the crossroads for accessibility in long-range development planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Transport Studies\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100015\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Transport Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950196224000140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Transport Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950196224000140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对区域交通规划成功与否进行分类的指标正在迅速从“一切照旧”的交通措施(如道路服务水平)演变为更可持续的可达性指标。将人与机会联系起来的指标。虽然这种传统的转变在现代规划中获得了动力,但无障碍规划策略的展示似乎是一种成败参半的努力——要么被古老的“先建设,后修正”范式所取代,要么在政策文件中被模糊地引用。这种流动性与以可达性为中心的规划(我们称之为AVM导向)的修辞及其应用经常与不确定性作斗争,并且在许多发展中地区仍然不一致,限制了对其当前规划方向的更清晰理解。我们的论文通过使用标准化可达性得分索引来捕捉加纳52个不同城市可达性规划的方向和整合,从而解决了这一差距。通过总结全国选定的市、市、区议会(mmda)最新中期发展计划和国家交通政策框架的数据,本研究考察了当前的规划方向、绩效衡量方面的差距以及采用更可持续指标的政策方向。我们发现,发展规划只是松散地承认可达性规划的原则,经常使用与传统可持续结果不一致的绩效指标。不到三分之一的mtdp包括任何土地使用和交通整合措施,更少的是车辆行驶里程(VMT)的减少。在实现可达性目标的mmda中,发展战略仍然优先考虑道路基础设施的扩张,尤其是在交通网络不发达的小型地区,这些先决措施是必要的。本文讨论了规划政策和实践的影响,同时提出了在长期发展规划中跨越可达性十字路口的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accessibility planning: Overlooked or absent by design in medium-term development plans? A catalog of the policy orientations for 52 diverse municipalities in Ghana
Metrics for cataloging regional transportation planning success are quickly evolving from the business-as-usual mobility measures like roadway level of service towards more sustainable accessibility indicators. Indicators that connect people to opportunities. While this conventional shift gains momentum in modern planning, the exhibition of accessibility planning strategies appear to be a hit-or-miss endeavor – either supplanted by the age-old "build first, make amends later" paradigm or vaguely referenced in policy documents. This rhetoric of mobility versus accessibility-centered planning (which we call AVM orientation) and its application often grapples with uncertainties and remains inconsistent in many developing regions, limiting a clearer understanding of their current planning orientation. Our paper addresses this gap by using normalized accessibility score indexing to capture the orientation and integration of accessibility planning for 52 diverse municipalities in Ghana. By syllogizing data from the most recent medium-term development plans of selected Metropolitan, Municipal, and District assemblies (MMDAs) nationwide and the National Transportation Policy framework, the study examines the current planning orientations, gaps in performance measures, and policy directions for adopting more sustainable metrics. We find that development planning only loosely acknowledges the principles of accessibility planning, often using performance metrics incongruent with conventional sustainable outcomes. Less than a third of MTDPs include any land use and transportation integration measures, and fewer still account for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reduction. Among the MMDAs that capture accessibility goals, development strategies still prioritize road infrastructure expansion, especially evident in small-sized Districts where the underdeveloped transportation network necessitates these prerequisite measures. The paper discusses implications for planning policy and practice while offering recommendations for bridging the crossroads for accessibility in long-range development planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信