硫唑嘌呤在TPO-RA时期ITP管理中的作用:一项单中心回顾性研究

Alexandre Le-Nguyen , Shamim Mortuza , Cyrus C. Hsia
{"title":"硫唑嘌呤在TPO-RA时期ITP管理中的作用:一项单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Alexandre Le-Nguyen ,&nbsp;Shamim Mortuza ,&nbsp;Cyrus C. Hsia","doi":"10.1016/j.bvth.2024.100035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>Access to modern therapeutics for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), such as thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), remains a challenge, limiting clinicians’ options. We investigated azathioprine in relapsed/refractory ITP to determine its efficacy and safety, focusing on evaluating its utility in post–TPO-RA patients. We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients, aged ≥18 years, who were worked up for thrombocytopenia between 2009 and 2022 at a tertiary care center in Ontario, Canada. Only patients with ITP treated with azathioprine were included. We identified 92 patients with ITP who received azathioprine, with a mean age of 55.6 ± 22.3 years; 53 were females and 39 males, with 64 having primary ITP. The overall response rate (ORR) was 47.8% (44/92), with a sustained response rate of 77.3% (34/44) at 6 months. The median time to response was 6 weeks. Fourteen patients (31.8%) relapsed, with a median duration of response of 10 weeks. Most patients (73.9%) had documented side effects, with nausea/vomiting, infections, and myelosuppression being the most common. The majority of patients received azathioprine as third-line therapy; 6 patients after TPO-RA and 27 after splenectomy. ORR was 50.0% (3/6) and 40.7% (11/27) in each group, respectively. This is the largest retrospective study, to our knowledge, demonstrating benefit with azathioprine in relapsed/refractory ITP. Its efficacy remains consistent both after TPO-RA (<em>P</em> = .948) and after splenectomy (<em>P</em> = .259), offering clinicians a comparable drug response irrespective of prior TPO-RA exposure or splenectomy. We propose that azathioprine remains a viable option for relapsed/refractory ITP in the TPO-RA era.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100190,"journal":{"name":"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of azathioprine in the management of ITP in the TPO-RA era: a single-center retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Le-Nguyen ,&nbsp;Shamim Mortuza ,&nbsp;Cyrus C. Hsia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bvth.2024.100035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>Access to modern therapeutics for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), such as thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), remains a challenge, limiting clinicians’ options. We investigated azathioprine in relapsed/refractory ITP to determine its efficacy and safety, focusing on evaluating its utility in post–TPO-RA patients. We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients, aged ≥18 years, who were worked up for thrombocytopenia between 2009 and 2022 at a tertiary care center in Ontario, Canada. Only patients with ITP treated with azathioprine were included. We identified 92 patients with ITP who received azathioprine, with a mean age of 55.6 ± 22.3 years; 53 were females and 39 males, with 64 having primary ITP. The overall response rate (ORR) was 47.8% (44/92), with a sustained response rate of 77.3% (34/44) at 6 months. The median time to response was 6 weeks. Fourteen patients (31.8%) relapsed, with a median duration of response of 10 weeks. Most patients (73.9%) had documented side effects, with nausea/vomiting, infections, and myelosuppression being the most common. The majority of patients received azathioprine as third-line therapy; 6 patients after TPO-RA and 27 after splenectomy. ORR was 50.0% (3/6) and 40.7% (11/27) in each group, respectively. This is the largest retrospective study, to our knowledge, demonstrating benefit with azathioprine in relapsed/refractory ITP. Its efficacy remains consistent both after TPO-RA (<em>P</em> = .948) and after splenectomy (<em>P</em> = .259), offering clinicians a comparable drug response irrespective of prior TPO-RA exposure or splenectomy. We propose that azathioprine remains a viable option for relapsed/refractory ITP in the TPO-RA era.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950327224000354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950327224000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要获得免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的现代治疗方法,如血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RAs),仍然是一个挑战,限制了临床医生的选择。我们研究了硫唑嘌呤在复发/难治性ITP中的疗效和安全性,重点评估了其在tpo - ra后患者中的应用。我们回顾性地回顾了2009年至2022年间在加拿大安大略省的一家三级保健中心接受血小板减少治疗的所有年龄≥18岁的成年患者。仅纳入用硫唑嘌呤治疗的ITP患者。我们确定92例ITP患者接受硫唑嘌呤治疗,平均年龄55.6±22.3岁;53名女性和39名男性,其中64名患有原发性ITP。总缓解率(ORR)为47.8%(44/92),6个月持续缓解率为77.3%(34/44)。中位反应时间为6周。14名患者(31.8%)复发,中位缓解持续时间为10周。大多数患者(73.9%)有记录的副作用,恶心/呕吐、感染和骨髓抑制是最常见的。大多数患者接受硫唑嘌呤作为三线治疗;TPO-RA术后6例,脾切除术后27例。两组的ORR分别为50.0%(3/6)和40.7%(11/27)。据我们所知,这是最大的回顾性研究,证明了硫唑嘌呤对复发/难治性ITP的益处。在TPO-RA (P = 0.948)和脾切除术(P = 0.259)后,其疗效保持一致,为临床医生提供了可比较的药物反应,而不考虑先前的TPO-RA暴露或脾切除术。我们认为,在TPO-RA时代,硫唑嘌呤仍然是治疗复发/难治性ITP的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of azathioprine in the management of ITP in the TPO-RA era: a single-center retrospective study

Abstract

Access to modern therapeutics for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), such as thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), remains a challenge, limiting clinicians’ options. We investigated azathioprine in relapsed/refractory ITP to determine its efficacy and safety, focusing on evaluating its utility in post–TPO-RA patients. We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients, aged ≥18 years, who were worked up for thrombocytopenia between 2009 and 2022 at a tertiary care center in Ontario, Canada. Only patients with ITP treated with azathioprine were included. We identified 92 patients with ITP who received azathioprine, with a mean age of 55.6 ± 22.3 years; 53 were females and 39 males, with 64 having primary ITP. The overall response rate (ORR) was 47.8% (44/92), with a sustained response rate of 77.3% (34/44) at 6 months. The median time to response was 6 weeks. Fourteen patients (31.8%) relapsed, with a median duration of response of 10 weeks. Most patients (73.9%) had documented side effects, with nausea/vomiting, infections, and myelosuppression being the most common. The majority of patients received azathioprine as third-line therapy; 6 patients after TPO-RA and 27 after splenectomy. ORR was 50.0% (3/6) and 40.7% (11/27) in each group, respectively. This is the largest retrospective study, to our knowledge, demonstrating benefit with azathioprine in relapsed/refractory ITP. Its efficacy remains consistent both after TPO-RA (P = .948) and after splenectomy (P = .259), offering clinicians a comparable drug response irrespective of prior TPO-RA exposure or splenectomy. We propose that azathioprine remains a viable option for relapsed/refractory ITP in the TPO-RA era.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信