ETASbootstrap 0.2.0:一个灵活的R包,用于计算时空流行型余震序列模型中参数的自举置信区间,有四个案例研究

IF 4.2 2区 地球科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
R. Peng , P. Dutilleul , C. Genest
{"title":"ETASbootstrap 0.2.0:一个灵活的R包,用于计算时空流行型余震序列模型中参数的自举置信区间,有四个案例研究","authors":"R. Peng ,&nbsp;P. Dutilleul ,&nbsp;C. Genest","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The space–time epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is a widely used tool for stochastic declustering of earthquake data catalogs and short-term aftershock forecasting. However, confidence intervals derived from asymptotic standard errors (ASEs) of parameter estimates based on maximum-likelihood theory can sometimes be misleading and it was recently suggested to use bootstrap confidence intervals instead (<span><span>Dutilleul et al., 2024</span></span>). The ETASbootstrap package was developed to facilitate the use of the bootstrap resampling procedure and its associated confidence intervals for a direct comparison with asymptotic ones. In this paper, the statistical underpinnings of the package are first presented, including the space–time ETAS model with its multiple parameters, the importance of edge effects, and the bootstrapping algorithm. Then, three earthquake data catalogs (Japan, Italy, Iran) are used as input to ETASbootstrap 0.2.0, which is more flexible regarding the shape of spatial windows than the original version. In all cases, a discrepancy was observed between bootstrap and asymptotic confidence intervals for some of the space–time ETAS model parameters. It was possible to relate this discrepancy to the presence of outliers and a resulting lack of normality, which compromised the asymptotic approximation of the variability of the maximum-likelihood estimates (ML estimates). The results suggest that the two types of confidence intervals should be used in practice, especially for earthquake data catalogs of moderate size.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55221,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Geosciences","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105817"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ETASbootstrap 0.2.0: A flexible R package for computing bootstrap confidence intervals for parameters in the space–time epidemic-type aftershock sequence model, with four case studies\",\"authors\":\"R. Peng ,&nbsp;P. Dutilleul ,&nbsp;C. Genest\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The space–time epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is a widely used tool for stochastic declustering of earthquake data catalogs and short-term aftershock forecasting. However, confidence intervals derived from asymptotic standard errors (ASEs) of parameter estimates based on maximum-likelihood theory can sometimes be misleading and it was recently suggested to use bootstrap confidence intervals instead (<span><span>Dutilleul et al., 2024</span></span>). The ETASbootstrap package was developed to facilitate the use of the bootstrap resampling procedure and its associated confidence intervals for a direct comparison with asymptotic ones. In this paper, the statistical underpinnings of the package are first presented, including the space–time ETAS model with its multiple parameters, the importance of edge effects, and the bootstrapping algorithm. Then, three earthquake data catalogs (Japan, Italy, Iran) are used as input to ETASbootstrap 0.2.0, which is more flexible regarding the shape of spatial windows than the original version. In all cases, a discrepancy was observed between bootstrap and asymptotic confidence intervals for some of the space–time ETAS model parameters. It was possible to relate this discrepancy to the presence of outliers and a resulting lack of normality, which compromised the asymptotic approximation of the variability of the maximum-likelihood estimates (ML estimates). The results suggest that the two types of confidence intervals should be used in practice, especially for earthquake data catalogs of moderate size.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300424003005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300424003005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

时空流行型余震序列(ETAS)模型是一种广泛应用于地震资料目录随机聚类和短期余震预报的工具。然而,基于最大似然理论的参数估计的渐近标准误差(ase)得出的置信区间有时会产生误导,最近有人建议使用bootstrap置信区间来代替(Dutilleul et al., 2024)。开发ETASbootstrap包是为了方便使用bootstrap重采样过程及其相关置信区间,以便与渐近置信区间进行直接比较。本文首先介绍了该包的统计基础,包括具有多参数的时空ETAS模型、边缘效应的重要性以及自举算法。然后,使用三个地震数据目录(日本,意大利,伊朗)作为ETASbootstrap 0.2.0的输入,该版本在空间窗口形状方面比原始版本更灵活。在所有情况下,观测到一些时空ETAS模型参数的自举置信区间与渐近置信区间之间存在差异。有可能将这种差异与异常值的存在以及由此导致的正态性缺失联系起来,这损害了最大似然估计(ML估计)变异性的渐近近似。结果表明,在实际应用中,特别是中等规模的地震资料目录,应采用这两种置信区间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ETASbootstrap 0.2.0: A flexible R package for computing bootstrap confidence intervals for parameters in the space–time epidemic-type aftershock sequence model, with four case studies
The space–time epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is a widely used tool for stochastic declustering of earthquake data catalogs and short-term aftershock forecasting. However, confidence intervals derived from asymptotic standard errors (ASEs) of parameter estimates based on maximum-likelihood theory can sometimes be misleading and it was recently suggested to use bootstrap confidence intervals instead (Dutilleul et al., 2024). The ETASbootstrap package was developed to facilitate the use of the bootstrap resampling procedure and its associated confidence intervals for a direct comparison with asymptotic ones. In this paper, the statistical underpinnings of the package are first presented, including the space–time ETAS model with its multiple parameters, the importance of edge effects, and the bootstrapping algorithm. Then, three earthquake data catalogs (Japan, Italy, Iran) are used as input to ETASbootstrap 0.2.0, which is more flexible regarding the shape of spatial windows than the original version. In all cases, a discrepancy was observed between bootstrap and asymptotic confidence intervals for some of the space–time ETAS model parameters. It was possible to relate this discrepancy to the presence of outliers and a resulting lack of normality, which compromised the asymptotic approximation of the variability of the maximum-likelihood estimates (ML estimates). The results suggest that the two types of confidence intervals should be used in practice, especially for earthquake data catalogs of moderate size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Geosciences
Computers & Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
6.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Geosciences publishes high impact, original research at the interface between Computer Sciences and Geosciences. Publications should apply modern computer science paradigms, whether computational or informatics-based, to address problems in the geosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信