再生混凝土骨料生产中的尖端技术和环境见解:全面回顾

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ram Prasad Neupane , Ningombam Reena Devi , Thanongsak Imjai , Abhishek Rajput , Takafumi Noguchi
{"title":"再生混凝土骨料生产中的尖端技术和环境见解:全面回顾","authors":"Ram Prasad Neupane ,&nbsp;Ningombam Reena Devi ,&nbsp;Thanongsak Imjai ,&nbsp;Abhishek Rajput ,&nbsp;Takafumi Noguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid growth of urban infrastructure has led to a substantial rise in construction and demolition waste (C&amp;DW), causing environmental issues like overflowing landfills and depletion of natural resources. Recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) offer a sustainable alternative to natural aggregates (NA), helping reduce landfill use and energy consumption by up to 85 % and lowering CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 90 %, providing significant environmental and economic benefits. However, untreated RCA exhibits lower strength and durability due to adhered mortar and impurities. This review delves into novel and advanced RCA treatment methods and production techniques that enhance RCA's properties. These methods achieve up to 42 % improvement in compressive strength and a 27 % reduction in water absorption. Researchers have found that impact crushers produce higher-quality aggregates compared to jaw or cone crushers. Treatments like acid washing and carbonation enhance particle density and reduce water absorption by 17.5 %. Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) produced from treated RCA can reach 87 % of the compressive strength of natural aggregate concrete (NAC), with certain combined treatments achieving results close to NAC. Inconsistencies in RCA properties due to various treatments emphasise the need for standardised production and testing guidelines. This review underscores RCA's role in promoting sustainable construction and its potential to significantly mitigate CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, encouraging further research to refine these methods for long-term environmental gains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74689,"journal":{"name":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 200241"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cutting-edge techniques and environmental insights in recycled concrete aggregate production: A comprehensive review\",\"authors\":\"Ram Prasad Neupane ,&nbsp;Ningombam Reena Devi ,&nbsp;Thanongsak Imjai ,&nbsp;Abhishek Rajput ,&nbsp;Takafumi Noguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The rapid growth of urban infrastructure has led to a substantial rise in construction and demolition waste (C&amp;DW), causing environmental issues like overflowing landfills and depletion of natural resources. Recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) offer a sustainable alternative to natural aggregates (NA), helping reduce landfill use and energy consumption by up to 85 % and lowering CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 90 %, providing significant environmental and economic benefits. However, untreated RCA exhibits lower strength and durability due to adhered mortar and impurities. This review delves into novel and advanced RCA treatment methods and production techniques that enhance RCA's properties. These methods achieve up to 42 % improvement in compressive strength and a 27 % reduction in water absorption. Researchers have found that impact crushers produce higher-quality aggregates compared to jaw or cone crushers. Treatments like acid washing and carbonation enhance particle density and reduce water absorption by 17.5 %. Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) produced from treated RCA can reach 87 % of the compressive strength of natural aggregate concrete (NAC), with certain combined treatments achieving results close to NAC. Inconsistencies in RCA properties due to various treatments emphasise the need for standardised production and testing guidelines. This review underscores RCA's role in promoting sustainable construction and its potential to significantly mitigate CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, encouraging further research to refine these methods for long-term environmental gains.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources, conservation & recycling advances\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Article 200241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources, conservation & recycling advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378924000403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378924000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市基础设施的快速发展导致建筑和拆除垃圾(C&;DW)的大幅增加,造成了垃圾填埋场溢出和自然资源枯竭等环境问题。再生混凝土骨料(RCA)是天然骨料(NA)的可持续替代品,有助于减少垃圾填埋场的使用和能源消耗高达85%,降低二氧化碳排放量90%,具有显著的环境和经济效益。然而,未经处理的RCA表现出较低的强度和耐久性,因为粘连砂浆和杂质。本文综述了提高RCA性能的新型和先进的RCA处理方法和生产技术。这些方法可使抗压强度提高42%,吸水率降低27%。研究人员发现,与颚式或圆锥式破碎机相比,冲击式破碎机生产的骨料质量更高。酸洗和碳化等处理提高了颗粒密度,减少了17.5%的吸水率。经处理的再生骨料混凝土(RAC)抗压强度可达到天然骨料混凝土(NAC)抗压强度的87%,某些组合处理可达到接近NAC的效果。由于各种处理方法导致的RCA性能的不一致性强调了标准化生产和测试指南的必要性。本综述强调了RCA在促进可持续建筑方面的作用及其显著减少二氧化碳排放的潜力,鼓励进一步研究以改进这些方法以获得长期的环境收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cutting-edge techniques and environmental insights in recycled concrete aggregate production: A comprehensive review
The rapid growth of urban infrastructure has led to a substantial rise in construction and demolition waste (C&DW), causing environmental issues like overflowing landfills and depletion of natural resources. Recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) offer a sustainable alternative to natural aggregates (NA), helping reduce landfill use and energy consumption by up to 85 % and lowering CO2 emissions by 90 %, providing significant environmental and economic benefits. However, untreated RCA exhibits lower strength and durability due to adhered mortar and impurities. This review delves into novel and advanced RCA treatment methods and production techniques that enhance RCA's properties. These methods achieve up to 42 % improvement in compressive strength and a 27 % reduction in water absorption. Researchers have found that impact crushers produce higher-quality aggregates compared to jaw or cone crushers. Treatments like acid washing and carbonation enhance particle density and reduce water absorption by 17.5 %. Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) produced from treated RCA can reach 87 % of the compressive strength of natural aggregate concrete (NAC), with certain combined treatments achieving results close to NAC. Inconsistencies in RCA properties due to various treatments emphasise the need for standardised production and testing guidelines. This review underscores RCA's role in promoting sustainable construction and its potential to significantly mitigate CO2 emissions, encouraging further research to refine these methods for long-term environmental gains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources, conservation & recycling advances
Resources, conservation & recycling advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信