澳大利亚维多利亚州北部农村联合医疗服务的使用情况。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Andrew J. Hamilton, Ryan McGrath, Lisa Bourke, Kristen M. Glenister, David Simmons
{"title":"澳大利亚维多利亚州北部农村联合医疗服务的使用情况。","authors":"Andrew J. Hamilton,&nbsp;Ryan McGrath,&nbsp;Lisa Bourke,&nbsp;Kristen M. Glenister,&nbsp;David Simmons","doi":"10.1111/ajr.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Little is known about the socio-demographic factors associated with the use of allied health services in rural Australia. The objective of this study was to determine which factors were associated with the use of various modes of allied health in a region of Northern Victoria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a secondary analysis of the Crossroads-II population health study. Generalised linear mixed models were constructed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Households were selected at random through address local government area lists. Data were collected by door-to-door surveying.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Settings</h3>\n \n <p>The northern part of the Goulburn Valley, Victoria, including one large rural conurbation (MM 3) and three medium rural towns (MM 4).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Over 15 years of age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Use of allied health services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The odds of using audiology (1.047 [1.035, 1.059]), optometry (1.034 [1.027, 1.042]) and podiatry (1.052 [1.039, 1.066]) increased with age, and psychology decreased (0.985 [0.974, 0.997]). Females had lower odds than males for audiology (0.708 [0.553, 0.907]) and greater odds for optometry (1.712 [1.421, 2.064]) and pharmacy advice (1.593 [1.317, 1.927]). Greater odds were observed forbeing Australian-born and pharmacy advice (1.581 [1.149, 2.175]), English spoken at home and physiotherapy (2.415 [1.279, 4.560]), a bachelor's degree and psychology (1.579 [1.011, 2.466]) and pharmacy advice (1.296 [1.002, 1.675]), not working and psychology (3.518 [1.999, 6.191]) and social work (4.202 [2.110, 8.367]). Those unable to work had greater odds of using six of the eight services investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Socio-demographic associations with allied health use vary across disciplines. For this population in rural Victoria, socio-demographic associations were observed for all of the allied health modalities studied. Such relationships need to be studied in other rural and allied health contexts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Allied Health Services in Rural Northern Victoria, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Hamilton,&nbsp;Ryan McGrath,&nbsp;Lisa Bourke,&nbsp;Kristen M. Glenister,&nbsp;David Simmons\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajr.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Little is known about the socio-demographic factors associated with the use of allied health services in rural Australia. The objective of this study was to determine which factors were associated with the use of various modes of allied health in a region of Northern Victoria.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is a secondary analysis of the Crossroads-II population health study. Generalised linear mixed models were constructed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Households were selected at random through address local government area lists. Data were collected by door-to-door surveying.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Settings</h3>\\n \\n <p>The northern part of the Goulburn Valley, Victoria, including one large rural conurbation (MM 3) and three medium rural towns (MM 4).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Over 15 years of age.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Use of allied health services.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The odds of using audiology (1.047 [1.035, 1.059]), optometry (1.034 [1.027, 1.042]) and podiatry (1.052 [1.039, 1.066]) increased with age, and psychology decreased (0.985 [0.974, 0.997]). Females had lower odds than males for audiology (0.708 [0.553, 0.907]) and greater odds for optometry (1.712 [1.421, 2.064]) and pharmacy advice (1.593 [1.317, 1.927]). Greater odds were observed forbeing Australian-born and pharmacy advice (1.581 [1.149, 2.175]), English spoken at home and physiotherapy (2.415 [1.279, 4.560]), a bachelor's degree and psychology (1.579 [1.011, 2.466]) and pharmacy advice (1.296 [1.002, 1.675]), not working and psychology (3.518 [1.999, 6.191]) and social work (4.202 [2.110, 8.367]). Those unable to work had greater odds of using six of the eight services investigated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Socio-demographic associations with allied health use vary across disciplines. For this population in rural Victoria, socio-demographic associations were observed for all of the allied health modalities studied. Such relationships need to be studied in other rural and allied health contexts.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在澳大利亚农村,人们对与使用联合医疗服务相关的社会人口因素知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定哪些因素与维多利亚州北部地区使用各种联合健康模式有关。方法:这是对Crossroads-II人口健康研究的二次分析。建立了广义线性混合模型。设计:通过地址、地方政府区域名单随机抽取住户。数据是通过挨家挨户调查收集的。地点:维多利亚州古尔本山谷北部,包括一个大型农村城市(MM 3)和三个中等农村城镇(MM 4)。参与者:15岁以上。主要结果衡量指标:联合医疗服务的使用情况。结果:患者使用听力学(1.047[1.035,1.059])、验光(1.034[1.027,1.042])、足部(1.052[1.039,1.066])的几率随年龄增长而增加,使用心理(0.985[0.974,0.997])的几率随年龄增长而降低。女性在听力学方面的患病率低于男性(0.708[0.553,0.907]),而在验光方面的患病率高于男性(1.712[1.421,2.064])和药房咨询方面的患病率高于男性(1.593[1.317,1.927])。在澳大利亚出生和药学咨询(1.581[1.149,2.175])、在家说英语和物理治疗(2.415[1.279,4.560])、学士学位和心理学(1.579[1.011,2.466])和药学咨询(1.296[1.002,1.675])、不工作和心理学(3.518[1.999,6.191])和社会工作(4.202[2.110,8.367])的几率更大。那些无法工作的人更有可能使用被调查的八项服务中的六项。结论:不同学科与联合医疗使用的社会人口学关联各不相同。对于维多利亚州农村的这一人口,观察到社会人口统计学与所研究的所有相关健康模式之间的关联。需要在其他农村和相关卫生环境中研究这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Allied Health Services in Rural Northern Victoria, Australia

Objective

Little is known about the socio-demographic factors associated with the use of allied health services in rural Australia. The objective of this study was to determine which factors were associated with the use of various modes of allied health in a region of Northern Victoria.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of the Crossroads-II population health study. Generalised linear mixed models were constructed.

Design

Households were selected at random through address local government area lists. Data were collected by door-to-door surveying.

Settings

The northern part of the Goulburn Valley, Victoria, including one large rural conurbation (MM 3) and three medium rural towns (MM 4).

Participants

Over 15 years of age.

Main Outcome Measures

Use of allied health services.

Results

The odds of using audiology (1.047 [1.035, 1.059]), optometry (1.034 [1.027, 1.042]) and podiatry (1.052 [1.039, 1.066]) increased with age, and psychology decreased (0.985 [0.974, 0.997]). Females had lower odds than males for audiology (0.708 [0.553, 0.907]) and greater odds for optometry (1.712 [1.421, 2.064]) and pharmacy advice (1.593 [1.317, 1.927]). Greater odds were observed forbeing Australian-born and pharmacy advice (1.581 [1.149, 2.175]), English spoken at home and physiotherapy (2.415 [1.279, 4.560]), a bachelor's degree and psychology (1.579 [1.011, 2.466]) and pharmacy advice (1.296 [1.002, 1.675]), not working and psychology (3.518 [1.999, 6.191]) and social work (4.202 [2.110, 8.367]). Those unable to work had greater odds of using six of the eight services investigated.

Conclusion

Socio-demographic associations with allied health use vary across disciplines. For this population in rural Victoria, socio-demographic associations were observed for all of the allied health modalities studied. Such relationships need to be studied in other rural and allied health contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信