妊娠期糖尿病筛查时机与母婴结局之间的关系:一项关于初级保健电子和医院行政数据的回顾性队列研究。

Helena Piccinini-Vallis , Mathew Grandy , Lynn Bussey , Jillian Coolen , Sarah Sabri
{"title":"妊娠期糖尿病筛查时机与母婴结局之间的关系:一项关于初级保健电子和医院行政数据的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Helena Piccinini-Vallis ,&nbsp;Mathew Grandy ,&nbsp;Lynn Bussey ,&nbsp;Jillian Coolen ,&nbsp;Sarah Sabri","doi":"10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gestational diabetes (GDM) is associated with adverse outcomes including a large-for-gestational age (LGA) baby, which in turn is associated with downstream childhood obesity. Appropriate timing of GDM screening is important for prompt initiation and optimization of medical management, potentially mitigating the risk of those outcomes. The present study explored the association between the timing of GDM screening and macrosomia, LGA, shoulder dystocia and caesarean section.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study linked primary care prenatal data and intrapartum data from a provincial hospital administrative database. Women with singleton pregnancies who received prenatal care between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2022 and who also delivered within that timeframe were included in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>198 participants were linked between the databases. Among participants for whom GDM risk could be calculated (n = 180), 30.6 % had late GDM screening. Unadjusted logistic regression models showed that late screening for GDM was associated with higher likelihood of LGA (OR = 2.89; 95 % CI = 1.19–7.04; p = 00.019). Adjusted models showed that the best predictor of macrosomia, LGA, and shoulder dystocia was excess gestational weight gain (GWG) (OR = 3.26, CI = 1.17–9.10, p = 0.024; OR 3.00, 95 % CI 0.91–9.93, p = 00.072; and OR = 3.52, CI = 0.83–14.84, p = 00.087 respectively); the best predictor of caesarean section was pre-pregnancy BMI (OR = 2.86; CI = 1.12 = 7.27; p = 0.028).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Almost one-third of participants had screening later than recommended, and late screening for GDM was associated with a higher likelihood of LGA. Linking longitudinal prenatal primary care data to hospital administrative data creates opportunities for future studies pertaining to prenatal care, potentially resulting in improvements in the care provided to vulnerable populations experiencing disproportionate rates of pre-pregnancy obesity and excess GWG.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100977,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Pillars","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between timing of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus and maternal and fetal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study linking primary care electronic and hospital administrative data\",\"authors\":\"Helena Piccinini-Vallis ,&nbsp;Mathew Grandy ,&nbsp;Lynn Bussey ,&nbsp;Jillian Coolen ,&nbsp;Sarah Sabri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gestational diabetes (GDM) is associated with adverse outcomes including a large-for-gestational age (LGA) baby, which in turn is associated with downstream childhood obesity. Appropriate timing of GDM screening is important for prompt initiation and optimization of medical management, potentially mitigating the risk of those outcomes. The present study explored the association between the timing of GDM screening and macrosomia, LGA, shoulder dystocia and caesarean section.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study linked primary care prenatal data and intrapartum data from a provincial hospital administrative database. Women with singleton pregnancies who received prenatal care between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2022 and who also delivered within that timeframe were included in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>198 participants were linked between the databases. Among participants for whom GDM risk could be calculated (n = 180), 30.6 % had late GDM screening. Unadjusted logistic regression models showed that late screening for GDM was associated with higher likelihood of LGA (OR = 2.89; 95 % CI = 1.19–7.04; p = 00.019). Adjusted models showed that the best predictor of macrosomia, LGA, and shoulder dystocia was excess gestational weight gain (GWG) (OR = 3.26, CI = 1.17–9.10, p = 0.024; OR 3.00, 95 % CI 0.91–9.93, p = 00.072; and OR = 3.52, CI = 0.83–14.84, p = 00.087 respectively); the best predictor of caesarean section was pre-pregnancy BMI (OR = 2.86; CI = 1.12 = 7.27; p = 0.028).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Almost one-third of participants had screening later than recommended, and late screening for GDM was associated with a higher likelihood of LGA. Linking longitudinal prenatal primary care data to hospital administrative data creates opportunities for future studies pertaining to prenatal care, potentially resulting in improvements in the care provided to vulnerable populations experiencing disproportionate rates of pre-pregnancy obesity and excess GWG.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Pillars\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786742/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Pillars\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368125000038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Pillars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368125000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)与不良结局相关,包括大胎龄(LGA)婴儿,这反过来又与下游儿童肥胖相关。GDM筛查的适当时机对于及时启动和优化医疗管理非常重要,可能会降低这些结果的风险。本研究探讨了GDM筛查时机与巨大儿、LGA、肩难产和剖宫产之间的关系。方法:本回顾性队列研究将来自省级医院管理数据库的初级保健产前数据和产时数据联系起来。在2019年7月1日至2022年12月31日期间接受产前护理并在该时间段内分娩的单胎妊娠妇女被纳入研究。结果:198名参与者在数据库之间建立了联系。在可以计算GDM风险的参与者中(n = 180), 30.6%的人进行了晚期GDM筛查。未经调整的logistic回归模型显示,晚期GDM筛查与LGA的可能性较高相关(OR = 2.89;95% ci = 1.19-7.04;p = 00.019)。调整后的模型显示,巨大儿、LGA和肩难产的最佳预测因子是妊娠体重增加过多(GWG) (OR = 3.26, CI = 1.17-9.10, p = 0.024;OR 3.00, 95% CI 0.91-9.93, p = 00.072;和= 3.52,CI = 0.83 - -14.84, p = 00.087);预测剖宫产的最佳指标是孕前BMI (OR = 2.86;ci = 1.12 = 7.27;p = 0.028)。结论:几乎三分之一的参与者比推荐的筛查时间晚,GDM的筛查时间晚与LGA的可能性高相关。将纵向产前初级保健数据与医院行政数据联系起来,为未来有关产前护理的研究创造了机会,这可能会改善对孕前肥胖和妊娠期妊娠率过高的弱势群体提供的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The relationship between timing of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus and maternal and fetal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study linking primary care electronic and hospital administrative data

The relationship between timing of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus and maternal and fetal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study linking primary care electronic and hospital administrative data

Background

Gestational diabetes (GDM) is associated with adverse outcomes including a large-for-gestational age (LGA) baby, which in turn is associated with downstream childhood obesity. Appropriate timing of GDM screening is important for prompt initiation and optimization of medical management, potentially mitigating the risk of those outcomes. The present study explored the association between the timing of GDM screening and macrosomia, LGA, shoulder dystocia and caesarean section.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study linked primary care prenatal data and intrapartum data from a provincial hospital administrative database. Women with singleton pregnancies who received prenatal care between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2022 and who also delivered within that timeframe were included in the study.

Results

198 participants were linked between the databases. Among participants for whom GDM risk could be calculated (n = 180), 30.6 % had late GDM screening. Unadjusted logistic regression models showed that late screening for GDM was associated with higher likelihood of LGA (OR = 2.89; 95 % CI = 1.19–7.04; p = 00.019). Adjusted models showed that the best predictor of macrosomia, LGA, and shoulder dystocia was excess gestational weight gain (GWG) (OR = 3.26, CI = 1.17–9.10, p = 0.024; OR 3.00, 95 % CI 0.91–9.93, p = 00.072; and OR = 3.52, CI = 0.83–14.84, p = 00.087 respectively); the best predictor of caesarean section was pre-pregnancy BMI (OR = 2.86; CI = 1.12 = 7.27; p = 0.028).

Conclusions

Almost one-third of participants had screening later than recommended, and late screening for GDM was associated with a higher likelihood of LGA. Linking longitudinal prenatal primary care data to hospital administrative data creates opportunities for future studies pertaining to prenatal care, potentially resulting in improvements in the care provided to vulnerable populations experiencing disproportionate rates of pre-pregnancy obesity and excess GWG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信