利用孕产妇败血症患者旅程来绘制马拉维高质量孕产妇保健的障碍并确定其优先次序:多学科利益攸关方协商讲习班。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Health Action Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2025.2451467
Yamikani Chimwaza, Dalisto Ndaferankhande, Leonard Mndala, Chifundo Ndamala, Emily Lifa, Mercy Machilika, Esther Mwagomba, Bernard Dossie, Meliya Kwelepeta, Bertha Maseko, David Lissauer, Maria Lisa Odland
{"title":"利用孕产妇败血症患者旅程来绘制马拉维高质量孕产妇保健的障碍并确定其优先次序:多学科利益攸关方协商讲习班。","authors":"Yamikani Chimwaza, Dalisto Ndaferankhande, Leonard Mndala, Chifundo Ndamala, Emily Lifa, Mercy Machilika, Esther Mwagomba, Bernard Dossie, Meliya Kwelepeta, Bertha Maseko, David Lissauer, Maria Lisa Odland","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2025.2451467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malawi has made progress in improving access to maternity care services, shifting the focus to quality of care as an essential determinant of maternal health outcomes. However, no effective mechanisms exist to use patients' experiences of care at health facilities to inform and improve the quality of maternal healthcare.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use maternal sepsis patient journeys in a workshop with maternal health stakeholders to identify and prioritise barriers in care and recommend interventions to improve maternal healthcare quality in Malawi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February 2024, in Blantyre, Malawi, using a modified nominal group technique, 28 stakeholders reviewed the patient journeys of three women hospitalised at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, who had sepsis after childbirth. Patient journeys narrate events experienced within a healthcare system in the patient's words. In a multiframework approach (Four Delays, Respectful Maternity Care, and WHO Quality of Care), stakeholders identified and prioritised barriers to care and recommended interventions to improve the quality of maternal healthcare. Content analysis of the workshop data linked barriers with stakeholders' suggested interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen barriers identified included various delays in receiving care, mistreatment by healthcare providers, and suboptimal quality of care. Stakeholders found patient journeys valuable and insightful for identifying gaps in the quality of care and promoting sepsis awareness among healthcare workers and the public.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient journeys are a novel tool for capturing the experience of care in Malawi. They have the potential to guide strategic improvements in maternal healthcare quality and ultimately reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"18 1","pages":"2451467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using maternal sepsis patient journeys to map and prioritise barriers to quality maternal healthcare in Malawi: a multidisciplinary stakeholder consultation workshop.\",\"authors\":\"Yamikani Chimwaza, Dalisto Ndaferankhande, Leonard Mndala, Chifundo Ndamala, Emily Lifa, Mercy Machilika, Esther Mwagomba, Bernard Dossie, Meliya Kwelepeta, Bertha Maseko, David Lissauer, Maria Lisa Odland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16549716.2025.2451467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malawi has made progress in improving access to maternity care services, shifting the focus to quality of care as an essential determinant of maternal health outcomes. However, no effective mechanisms exist to use patients' experiences of care at health facilities to inform and improve the quality of maternal healthcare.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use maternal sepsis patient journeys in a workshop with maternal health stakeholders to identify and prioritise barriers in care and recommend interventions to improve maternal healthcare quality in Malawi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February 2024, in Blantyre, Malawi, using a modified nominal group technique, 28 stakeholders reviewed the patient journeys of three women hospitalised at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, who had sepsis after childbirth. Patient journeys narrate events experienced within a healthcare system in the patient's words. In a multiframework approach (Four Delays, Respectful Maternity Care, and WHO Quality of Care), stakeholders identified and prioritised barriers to care and recommended interventions to improve the quality of maternal healthcare. Content analysis of the workshop data linked barriers with stakeholders' suggested interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen barriers identified included various delays in receiving care, mistreatment by healthcare providers, and suboptimal quality of care. Stakeholders found patient journeys valuable and insightful for identifying gaps in the quality of care and promoting sepsis awareness among healthcare workers and the public.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient journeys are a novel tool for capturing the experience of care in Malawi. They have the potential to guide strategic improvements in maternal healthcare quality and ultimately reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Action\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2451467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792116/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2451467\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2451467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:马拉维在改善获得产妇保健服务的机会方面取得了进展,将重点转向作为产妇保健结果的基本决定因素的护理质量。然而,目前还没有有效的机制来利用病人在卫生机构的护理经验,为产妇保健提供信息并提高其质量。目的:利用孕产妇败血症患者旅程与孕产妇保健利益攸关方在研讨会上确定和优先考虑护理障碍,并建议干预措施,以提高马拉维的孕产妇保健质量。方法:2024年2月,在马拉维的布兰太尔,使用改良的名义团体技术,28名利益相关者审查了伊丽莎白女王中心医院住院的三名分娩后患有败血症的妇女的患者旅程。病人旅程用病人的话叙述在医疗保健系统中经历的事件。在多框架方法(四种延迟、尊重产妇护理和世卫组织护理质量)中,利益攸关方确定了护理障碍并确定了重点,并建议了改善产妇保健质量的干预措施。讲习班数据的内容分析将障碍与利益攸关方建议的干预措施联系起来。结果:确定的19个障碍包括接受护理的各种延误、医疗保健提供者的不当对待和护理质量欠佳。利益相关者发现,患者旅程对于确定护理质量差距和提高医护人员和公众对败血症的认识是有价值和有见地的。结论:患者旅程是一种捕捉马拉维护理经验的新工具。它们有可能指导战略性改善产妇保健质量,并最终降低产妇发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using maternal sepsis patient journeys to map and prioritise barriers to quality maternal healthcare in Malawi: a multidisciplinary stakeholder consultation workshop.

Background: Malawi has made progress in improving access to maternity care services, shifting the focus to quality of care as an essential determinant of maternal health outcomes. However, no effective mechanisms exist to use patients' experiences of care at health facilities to inform and improve the quality of maternal healthcare.

Objective: To use maternal sepsis patient journeys in a workshop with maternal health stakeholders to identify and prioritise barriers in care and recommend interventions to improve maternal healthcare quality in Malawi.

Methods: In February 2024, in Blantyre, Malawi, using a modified nominal group technique, 28 stakeholders reviewed the patient journeys of three women hospitalised at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, who had sepsis after childbirth. Patient journeys narrate events experienced within a healthcare system in the patient's words. In a multiframework approach (Four Delays, Respectful Maternity Care, and WHO Quality of Care), stakeholders identified and prioritised barriers to care and recommended interventions to improve the quality of maternal healthcare. Content analysis of the workshop data linked barriers with stakeholders' suggested interventions.

Results: Nineteen barriers identified included various delays in receiving care, mistreatment by healthcare providers, and suboptimal quality of care. Stakeholders found patient journeys valuable and insightful for identifying gaps in the quality of care and promoting sepsis awareness among healthcare workers and the public.

Conclusions: Patient journeys are a novel tool for capturing the experience of care in Malawi. They have the potential to guide strategic improvements in maternal healthcare quality and ultimately reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信