IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zorana Matić, Yeinn Oh, Amanda Grindle, Jennifer R DuBose, Lisa Lim
{"title":"Keeping Healthcare Workers Safe During a Pandemic: Evaluating Doffing Area Design for Safer Removal of Personal Protective Equipment.","authors":"Zorana Matić, Yeinn Oh, Amanda Grindle, Jennifer R DuBose, Lisa Lim","doi":"10.1177/19375867241311273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study proposes a user-centered methodology to quantify the design affordances of doffing spaces, focusing on the safety and efficiency of healthcare workers (HCWs).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Doffing personal protective equipment (PPE) poses a significant challenge for healthcare workers (HCWs) due to the high risk of self-contamination. The physical design of the doffing area plays an important role in ensuring safety during this process. However, there currently are no established spatial metrics for assessing the design of doffing spaces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four doffing areas in two Biocontainment Units (BCUs) were evaluated using Functional Scenario (FS) analysis method. FSs, representing the spatial needs of key users (HCW and Trained Observer-TO) were developed based on observations, literature, and discussions with staff. For each FS, we defined quantifiable metrics for visualizing the user's needs and evaluating doffing area design performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We defined 11 FSs (seven for HCWs and four for TOs) and 19 associated spatial metrics. FSs for the HCW focused on the prevention of self- and cross-contamination, as well as facilitating visibility, efficiency, and situational and process awareness. The FSs for the TO center on preventing self-contamination, promoting visibility and process awareness, and safe waste management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FS approach allowed for the quantification of doffing area affordances and evaluation of how they impact HCW performance, emphasizing design aspects that enhance safety and efficiency. The presented metrics and study findings are expected to inform the future design of spaces where doffing occurs and provide new guidance for improved doffing safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19375867241311273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867241311273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究提出了一种以用户为中心的方法来量化脱衣空间的设计能力:本研究提出了一种以用户为中心的方法来量化脱衣空间的设计能力,重点关注医护人员(HCWs)的安全和效率:背景:由于自我污染的高风险,脱下个人防护设备(PPE)对医护人员(HCWs)来说是一项重大挑战。脱卸区域的物理设计在确保这一过程的安全方面发挥着重要作用。然而,目前还没有既定的空间指标来评估脱衣区的设计:方法:采用功能场景(FS)分析方法,对两个生物安全单元(BCU)中的四个卸妆区进行了评估。根据观察结果、文献资料以及与工作人员的讨论,制定了代表主要用户(高危作业人员和受训观察人员--TO)空间需求的 FS。我们为每个 FS 定义了可量化的指标,用于直观反映用户需求和评估停机坪区域的设计性能:我们定义了 11 个 FS(7 个适用于高危作业人员,4 个适用于脱卸人员)和 19 个相关的空间指标。针对高危作业人员的 FSs 侧重于防止自我污染和交叉污染,以及提高能见度、效率、态势和流程意识。而针对 TO 的 FS 则侧重于防止自我污染、提高能见度和流程意识以及废物安全管理:FS 方法允许对脱落区的承受能力进行量化,并对其如何影响高危工作性能进行评估,同时强调提高安全性和效率的设计方面。所提出的衡量标准和研究结果有望为落脚空间的未来设计提供参考,并为改善落脚安全提供新的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Keeping Healthcare Workers Safe During a Pandemic: Evaluating Doffing Area Design for Safer Removal of Personal Protective Equipment.

Objective: This study proposes a user-centered methodology to quantify the design affordances of doffing spaces, focusing on the safety and efficiency of healthcare workers (HCWs).

Background: Doffing personal protective equipment (PPE) poses a significant challenge for healthcare workers (HCWs) due to the high risk of self-contamination. The physical design of the doffing area plays an important role in ensuring safety during this process. However, there currently are no established spatial metrics for assessing the design of doffing spaces.

Methods: Four doffing areas in two Biocontainment Units (BCUs) were evaluated using Functional Scenario (FS) analysis method. FSs, representing the spatial needs of key users (HCW and Trained Observer-TO) were developed based on observations, literature, and discussions with staff. For each FS, we defined quantifiable metrics for visualizing the user's needs and evaluating doffing area design performance.

Results: We defined 11 FSs (seven for HCWs and four for TOs) and 19 associated spatial metrics. FSs for the HCW focused on the prevention of self- and cross-contamination, as well as facilitating visibility, efficiency, and situational and process awareness. The FSs for the TO center on preventing self-contamination, promoting visibility and process awareness, and safe waste management.

Conclusions: The FS approach allowed for the quantification of doffing area affordances and evaluation of how they impact HCW performance, emphasizing design aspects that enhance safety and efficiency. The presented metrics and study findings are expected to inform the future design of spaces where doffing occurs and provide new guidance for improved doffing safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信