筛选髋关节发育不良的耻骨股骨距离的年龄优化临界值。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Hans-Christen Husum, Michel B Hellfritzsch, Rikke D Maimburg, Bjarne Møller-Madsen, Mads Henriksen, Natallia Lapitskaya, Søren Kold, Ole Rahbek
{"title":"筛选髋关节发育不良的耻骨股骨距离的年龄优化临界值。","authors":"Hans-Christen Husum, Michel B Hellfritzsch, Rikke D Maimburg, Bjarne Møller-Madsen, Mads Henriksen, Natallia Lapitskaya, Søren Kold, Ole Rahbek","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0181.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To establish cut-off values for lateral pubofemoral distance (PFD) measurements for detecting hip dysplasia in early (four days) and standard care (six weeks) screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All newborns, during a one-year period (October 2021 to October 2022), were offered a PFD ultrasound (US) examination in addition to the existing screening programme for DDH. Newborns who were referred for standard care hip US, suspected for DDH, received a secondary PFD US examination in conjunction with the standard care Graf/Harcke hip US examination. Receiver operating characteristic curves and empirically optimal cut-off values were calculated with a true positive defined as a Graf type ≥ IIc hip.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2,735 newborns, of whom 758 received both early PFD hip US and standard care Graf/Harcke hip US. For early (four days) PFD screening, the optimal cut-off point was calculated to be 6.2 mm (95% CI 4.7 to 7.7) producing a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI 55% to 100%) and a specificity of 87% (86% to 89%). For PFD screening performed at standard care (six weeks) hip US, the optimal cut-off point was calculated to be 5.6 mm (95% CI 4.9 to 6.3) producing a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 100% to 100%) and a specificity of 96% (95% CI 95% to 97%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PFD US screening produces a high degree of both sensitivity and specificity for detecting DDH. Age-specific cut-off values should be used to heighten the accuracy of PFD US screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 2","pages":"119-125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-optimized cut-off values for pubofemoral distances in screening for hip dysplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Hans-Christen Husum, Michel B Hellfritzsch, Rikke D Maimburg, Bjarne Møller-Madsen, Mads Henriksen, Natallia Lapitskaya, Søren Kold, Ole Rahbek\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0181.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To establish cut-off values for lateral pubofemoral distance (PFD) measurements for detecting hip dysplasia in early (four days) and standard care (six weeks) screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All newborns, during a one-year period (October 2021 to October 2022), were offered a PFD ultrasound (US) examination in addition to the existing screening programme for DDH. Newborns who were referred for standard care hip US, suspected for DDH, received a secondary PFD US examination in conjunction with the standard care Graf/Harcke hip US examination. Receiver operating characteristic curves and empirically optimal cut-off values were calculated with a true positive defined as a Graf type ≥ IIc hip.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2,735 newborns, of whom 758 received both early PFD hip US and standard care Graf/Harcke hip US. For early (four days) PFD screening, the optimal cut-off point was calculated to be 6.2 mm (95% CI 4.7 to 7.7) producing a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI 55% to 100%) and a specificity of 87% (86% to 89%). For PFD screening performed at standard care (six weeks) hip US, the optimal cut-off point was calculated to be 5.6 mm (95% CI 4.9 to 6.3) producing a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 100% to 100%) and a specificity of 96% (95% CI 95% to 97%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PFD US screening produces a high degree of both sensitivity and specificity for detecting DDH. Age-specific cut-off values should be used to heighten the accuracy of PFD US screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"119-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0181.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0181.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为早期(4天)检测髋关节发育不良和标准治疗(6周)筛查髋关节发育不良(DDH)建立耻骨股骨外侧距离(PFD)测量的临界值。方法:在一年内(2021年10月至2022年10月),除了现有的DDH筛查计划外,还对所有新生儿进行了PFD超声(US)检查。转介标准护理髋关节超声检查的新生儿,疑似DDH,在标准护理Graf/Harcke髋关节超声检查的同时接受二次PFD超声检查。以Graf型≥IIc髋关节为真阳性,计算受试者工作特征曲线和经验最佳截断值。结果:我们纳入了2735名新生儿,其中758名接受了早期PFD髋关节超声检查和标准护理Graf/Harcke髋关节超声检查。对于早期(4天)PFD筛查,计算出最佳截断点为6.2 mm (95% CI 4.7至7.7),产生80% (95% CI 55%至100%)的敏感性和87%(86%至89%)的特异性。对于在标准护理(6周)髋关节US中进行的PFD筛查,计算出最佳截断点为5.6 mm (95% CI 4.9至6.3),产生100%的灵敏度(95% CI 100%至100%)和96%的特异性(95% CI 95%至97%)。结论:PFD US筛查对DDH的检测具有较高的敏感性和特异性。应使用年龄特异性临界值来提高PFD US筛查的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age-optimized cut-off values for pubofemoral distances in screening for hip dysplasia.

Aims: To establish cut-off values for lateral pubofemoral distance (PFD) measurements for detecting hip dysplasia in early (four days) and standard care (six weeks) screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Methods: All newborns, during a one-year period (October 2021 to October 2022), were offered a PFD ultrasound (US) examination in addition to the existing screening programme for DDH. Newborns who were referred for standard care hip US, suspected for DDH, received a secondary PFD US examination in conjunction with the standard care Graf/Harcke hip US examination. Receiver operating characteristic curves and empirically optimal cut-off values were calculated with a true positive defined as a Graf type ≥ IIc hip.

Results: We included 2,735 newborns, of whom 758 received both early PFD hip US and standard care Graf/Harcke hip US. For early (four days) PFD screening, the optimal cut-off point was calculated to be 6.2 mm (95% CI 4.7 to 7.7) producing a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI 55% to 100%) and a specificity of 87% (86% to 89%). For PFD screening performed at standard care (six weeks) hip US, the optimal cut-off point was calculated to be 5.6 mm (95% CI 4.9 to 6.3) producing a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 100% to 100%) and a specificity of 96% (95% CI 95% to 97%).

Conclusion: PFD US screening produces a high degree of both sensitivity and specificity for detecting DDH. Age-specific cut-off values should be used to heighten the accuracy of PFD US screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信