护士在谵妄患者管理中的优先顺序模式:q -方法学研究的结果。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1002/nur.22449
Luisa Sist, Matteo Pezzolati, Nikita Valentina Ugenti, Silvia Cedioli, Rossella Messina, Stefania Chiappinotto, Paola Rucci, Alvisa Palese
{"title":"护士在谵妄患者管理中的优先顺序模式:q -方法学研究的结果。","authors":"Luisa Sist, Matteo Pezzolati, Nikita Valentina Ugenti, Silvia Cedioli, Rossella Messina, Stefania Chiappinotto, Paola Rucci, Alvisa Palese","doi":"10.1002/nur.22449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nurses are required to decide on priorities; however, how they prioritize the interventions toward patients with delirium is still unclear. Therefore, expanding the knowledge on (a) how nurses prioritize interventions to manage episodes of delirium and (b) the underlying prioritization patterns were the aims of this study. The Q-methodology was applied in 2021. A systematic review to identify the recommended interventions for patients with delirium was performed, and a nominal group technique was used to select those interventions that are applicable in daily practice (35 out of 96 identified). Then, using a specific scenario, 56 clinical nurses working in hospital medical (n = 31), geriatric (n = 15), and postacute (n = 10) units were asked to order the 35 interventions (from -4 the lowest to +4 the highest priority) using a Q-sort table. Averages (confidence interval at 95%) were calculated at the group level, and a by-person factor analysis was applied to discover underlying patterns of prioritization at the overall and at the individual levels. At the group level, \"Ensuring a safe environment (e.g., reducing bed height)\" was ranked as the highest priority (2.29 out of four); at the individual level, three prioritization patterns accounting for a total variance of 50.21% have emerged: \"Individual needs-oriented\" (33.82% variance explained; 41 nurses); \"Prevention-oriented\" (8.47%; five nurses); and \"Cognitive-oriented\" (7.92%; six nurses). At the group level, nurses prioritize safety while caring for patients with delirium; however, at the individual level, they follow three different patterns of prioritization oriented toward diverse aspects, suggesting uncertainty in the actions to be taken-with potential implications for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"257-270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritization Patterns of Nurses in the Management of a Patient With Delirium: Results of a Q-Methodology Study.\",\"authors\":\"Luisa Sist, Matteo Pezzolati, Nikita Valentina Ugenti, Silvia Cedioli, Rossella Messina, Stefania Chiappinotto, Paola Rucci, Alvisa Palese\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nur.22449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nurses are required to decide on priorities; however, how they prioritize the interventions toward patients with delirium is still unclear. Therefore, expanding the knowledge on (a) how nurses prioritize interventions to manage episodes of delirium and (b) the underlying prioritization patterns were the aims of this study. The Q-methodology was applied in 2021. A systematic review to identify the recommended interventions for patients with delirium was performed, and a nominal group technique was used to select those interventions that are applicable in daily practice (35 out of 96 identified). Then, using a specific scenario, 56 clinical nurses working in hospital medical (n = 31), geriatric (n = 15), and postacute (n = 10) units were asked to order the 35 interventions (from -4 the lowest to +4 the highest priority) using a Q-sort table. Averages (confidence interval at 95%) were calculated at the group level, and a by-person factor analysis was applied to discover underlying patterns of prioritization at the overall and at the individual levels. At the group level, \\\"Ensuring a safe environment (e.g., reducing bed height)\\\" was ranked as the highest priority (2.29 out of four); at the individual level, three prioritization patterns accounting for a total variance of 50.21% have emerged: \\\"Individual needs-oriented\\\" (33.82% variance explained; 41 nurses); \\\"Prevention-oriented\\\" (8.47%; five nurses); and \\\"Cognitive-oriented\\\" (7.92%; six nurses). At the group level, nurses prioritize safety while caring for patients with delirium; however, at the individual level, they follow three different patterns of prioritization oriented toward diverse aspects, suggesting uncertainty in the actions to be taken-with potential implications for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"257-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22449\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护士被要求决定优先事项;然而,他们如何优先考虑对谵妄患者的干预仍不清楚。因此,扩大知识(a)护士如何优先干预管理谵妄发作和(b)潜在的优先模式是本研究的目的。q -方法学于2021年应用。对谵妄患者进行了系统评价,以确定推荐的干预措施,并采用名义组技术选择那些适用于日常实践的干预措施(96个确定的干预措施中有35个)。然后,使用一个特定的场景,要求56名在医院医疗(n = 31)、老年(n = 15)和急性后(n = 10)单位工作的临床护士使用q排序表对35种干预措施(从最低优先级-4到最高优先级+4)进行排序。在组水平上计算平均值(置信区间为95%),并应用个人因素分析来发现总体和个人水平上优先级的潜在模式。在小组层面,“确保安全的环境(例如,减少床的高度)”被列为最高优先级(2.29分);在个体层面上,出现了三种优先排序模式,占总方差的50.21%:“以个体需求为导向”(33.82%的方差得到解释;41岁的护士);“摘要”(8.47%;五个护士);“认知导向”(7.92%);六个护士)。在群体层面,护士在照顾谵妄患者时优先考虑安全;然而,在个人层面上,他们遵循面向不同方面的三种不同的优先顺序模式,这表明要采取的行动存在不确定性——对患者有潜在的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prioritization Patterns of Nurses in the Management of a Patient With Delirium: Results of a Q-Methodology Study.

Prioritization Patterns of Nurses in the Management of a Patient With Delirium: Results of a Q-Methodology Study.

Prioritization Patterns of Nurses in the Management of a Patient With Delirium: Results of a Q-Methodology Study.

Prioritization Patterns of Nurses in the Management of a Patient With Delirium: Results of a Q-Methodology Study.

Nurses are required to decide on priorities; however, how they prioritize the interventions toward patients with delirium is still unclear. Therefore, expanding the knowledge on (a) how nurses prioritize interventions to manage episodes of delirium and (b) the underlying prioritization patterns were the aims of this study. The Q-methodology was applied in 2021. A systematic review to identify the recommended interventions for patients with delirium was performed, and a nominal group technique was used to select those interventions that are applicable in daily practice (35 out of 96 identified). Then, using a specific scenario, 56 clinical nurses working in hospital medical (n = 31), geriatric (n = 15), and postacute (n = 10) units were asked to order the 35 interventions (from -4 the lowest to +4 the highest priority) using a Q-sort table. Averages (confidence interval at 95%) were calculated at the group level, and a by-person factor analysis was applied to discover underlying patterns of prioritization at the overall and at the individual levels. At the group level, "Ensuring a safe environment (e.g., reducing bed height)" was ranked as the highest priority (2.29 out of four); at the individual level, three prioritization patterns accounting for a total variance of 50.21% have emerged: "Individual needs-oriented" (33.82% variance explained; 41 nurses); "Prevention-oriented" (8.47%; five nurses); and "Cognitive-oriented" (7.92%; six nurses). At the group level, nurses prioritize safety while caring for patients with delirium; however, at the individual level, they follow three different patterns of prioritization oriented toward diverse aspects, suggesting uncertainty in the actions to be taken-with potential implications for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信