医学生远程教学同伴辅导肌肉骨骼超声训练——TELMUS研究。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ricarda Neubauer, Florian Recker, Claus-Juergen Bauer, Simon Petzinna, Pantelis Karakostas, Charlotte Behning, Valentin Sebastian Schäfer
{"title":"医学生远程教学同伴辅导肌肉骨骼超声训练——TELMUS研究。","authors":"Ricarda Neubauer, Florian Recker, Claus-Juergen Bauer, Simon Petzinna, Pantelis Karakostas, Charlotte Behning, Valentin Sebastian Schäfer","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keae709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite growing interest in musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS), training opportunities are often limited due to staff shortages and disbalances of expertise between rural and urban areas. Teledidactic approaches have the potential to expand access to training opportunities. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of teledidactic peer-tutored MSUS training to a conventional approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A teledidactic course was held by a student tutor following a validated MSUS curriculum. An on-campus MSUS training taught by physician lecturers served as a control. Students were randomly assigned to one of both study groups. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) were conducted before and after the training to objectively measure the learning outcome of the participants. Handheld ultrasound devices (ButterflyIQ®) and iPads (Apple Inc., eighth generation) were provided to the students for the MSUS course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty medical students participated in the study. Prior to the course, baseline OSCE scores were recorded as 13.03/63 (SD ± 4.20) for the on-campus cohort and 13.00/63 (SD ± 6.04) for the teledidactic group. In the post-training OSCE evaluation, the on-campus cohort attained an average score of 56.80/63 (SD ± 4.22), while the TELMUS group averagely achieved 58.53/63 points (SD ± 3.52). While all students' skills increased over time, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts either before or after the course.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peer-tutored, teledidactic MSUS training showed to be non-inferior to the conventional approach and is a promising approach to reduce local and global disparities in educational opportunities regarding MSUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"3344-3351"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teledidactic peer-tutored musculoskeletal ultrasound training for medical students-the TELMUS study.\",\"authors\":\"Ricarda Neubauer, Florian Recker, Claus-Juergen Bauer, Simon Petzinna, Pantelis Karakostas, Charlotte Behning, Valentin Sebastian Schäfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rheumatology/keae709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite growing interest in musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS), training opportunities are often limited due to staff shortages and disbalances of expertise between rural and urban areas. Teledidactic approaches have the potential to expand access to training opportunities. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of teledidactic peer-tutored MSUS training to a conventional approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A teledidactic course was held by a student tutor following a validated MSUS curriculum. An on-campus MSUS training taught by physician lecturers served as a control. Students were randomly assigned to one of both study groups. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) were conducted before and after the training to objectively measure the learning outcome of the participants. Handheld ultrasound devices (ButterflyIQ®) and iPads (Apple Inc., eighth generation) were provided to the students for the MSUS course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty medical students participated in the study. Prior to the course, baseline OSCE scores were recorded as 13.03/63 (SD ± 4.20) for the on-campus cohort and 13.00/63 (SD ± 6.04) for the teledidactic group. In the post-training OSCE evaluation, the on-campus cohort attained an average score of 56.80/63 (SD ± 4.22), while the TELMUS group averagely achieved 58.53/63 points (SD ± 3.52). While all students' skills increased over time, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts either before or after the course.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peer-tutored, teledidactic MSUS training showed to be non-inferior to the conventional approach and is a promising approach to reduce local and global disparities in educational opportunities regarding MSUS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3344-3351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae709\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:尽管人们对肌肉骨骼超声(MSUS)越来越感兴趣,但由于工作人员短缺和城乡地区专业知识的不平衡,培训机会往往有限。远程教学方法有可能扩大获得培训机会的机会。本研究旨在比较远程教学的同伴辅导MSUS培训与传统方法的有效性。方法:远程教学课程由一名学生导师按照经过验证的MSUS课程进行。由医师讲师授课的校园MSUS培训作为对照。学生们被随机分配到两个学习小组中的一个。在培训前后进行客观结构化临床检查(OSCE),客观地衡量参与者的学习效果。MSUS课程为学生提供了手持超声设备(butterfliq®)和ipad (Apple Inc.,第8代)。结果:30名医学生参与本研究。课程开始前,在校组的OSCE基线分数为13.03/63 (SD±4.20),远程教学组的OSCE基线分数为13.00/63 (SD±6.04)。在培训后的OSCE评估中,校内组的平均得分为56.80/63 (SD±4.22),而TELMUS组的平均得分为58.53/63 (SD±3.52)。虽然所有学生的技能都随着时间的推移而提高,但在课程前后,两组学生之间没有显著差异。结论:同侪辅导、远程教学的MSUS培训表现出不逊于传统方法,是一种有希望的方法,可以减少当地和全球在MSUS教育机会方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teledidactic peer-tutored musculoskeletal ultrasound training for medical students-the TELMUS study.

Objectives: Despite growing interest in musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS), training opportunities are often limited due to staff shortages and disbalances of expertise between rural and urban areas. Teledidactic approaches have the potential to expand access to training opportunities. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of teledidactic peer-tutored MSUS training to a conventional approach.

Methods: A teledidactic course was held by a student tutor following a validated MSUS curriculum. An on-campus MSUS training taught by physician lecturers served as a control. Students were randomly assigned to one of both study groups. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) were conducted before and after the training to objectively measure the learning outcome of the participants. Handheld ultrasound devices (ButterflyIQ®) and iPads (Apple Inc., eighth generation) were provided to the students for the MSUS course.

Results: Thirty medical students participated in the study. Prior to the course, baseline OSCE scores were recorded as 13.03/63 (SD ± 4.20) for the on-campus cohort and 13.00/63 (SD ± 6.04) for the teledidactic group. In the post-training OSCE evaluation, the on-campus cohort attained an average score of 56.80/63 (SD ± 4.22), while the TELMUS group averagely achieved 58.53/63 points (SD ± 3.52). While all students' skills increased over time, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts either before or after the course.

Conclusion: Peer-tutored, teledidactic MSUS training showed to be non-inferior to the conventional approach and is a promising approach to reduce local and global disparities in educational opportunities regarding MSUS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信