开发和验证一个全球触发工具,用于评估儿科住院病房药物不良事件的频率、危害水平和可预防性。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amit Gutkind, Amos Toren, Raz Somech, Yael Bezalel, Ronen Loebstein, Yair Edden, Bernice Oberman, Eyal Zimlichman
{"title":"开发和验证一个全球触发工具,用于评估儿科住院病房药物不良事件的频率、危害水平和可预防性。","authors":"Amit Gutkind, Amos Toren, Raz Somech, Yael Bezalel, Ronen Loebstein, Yair Edden, Bernice Oberman, Eyal Zimlichman","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medications are a major cause of harm to patients in hospitals, and several studies have found that they cause approximately 20% of injuries that occur in medical institutions. It was found that the rate of adverse drug events (ADEs) in pediatric hospitalizations ranges from 11 to 40 events per 100 hospitalizations and 1% of cases caused death.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a comparative and retrospective study. The overarching objective is to adapt the Pediatric Trigger Tool (PTT) of the \"Child Health Corporation of America\" to pediatric wards in Israel, with the intention of using it to assess the rate of adverse events that occur during medication given in pediatric wards. The study characterized ADEs and examined the ability of the PTT to identify ADEs in relation to those that were voluntarily reported by the staff.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study included internal and surgical pediatric wards at an academic pediatric medical center. The PTT was validated on medical record data from 700 hospitalizations between the years 2015 and 2017. The study also determined, among other things: the stage of drug administration at which the events occurred, the percentage of all events that could have been prevented, the degrees of damage the ADE caused and more.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Positive Predictive Value of the customized tool stands at 16.91%. The study found 108 ADEs in 78 hospitalizations. The ADE rate per 100 hospitalizations was 15.4, the ADE rate per 1000 drug doses was 3.9, and the ADE rate per 1000 hospitalization days was 22.8, of which 18.5% were preventable. The category of drugs that led to the highest number of ADEs was painkillers. Those ADEs led to a large number of adverse clinical effects: constipation, hypokalemia, vomiting, and rash. The most common reason for coming to the hospital was suspicion or treatment of a hematologic disease, followed by hospitalization due to a burn. The customized tool found 10.8 times more ADEs than those reported voluntarily-subjectively by the clinical staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that, properly adapted, the PTT tool can be used to detect ADEs in internal and surgical pediatric wards.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and validating a Global Trigger Tool for assessing frequency, level of harm, and preventability of adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients units.\",\"authors\":\"Amit Gutkind, Amos Toren, Raz Somech, Yael Bezalel, Ronen Loebstein, Yair Edden, Bernice Oberman, Eyal Zimlichman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medications are a major cause of harm to patients in hospitals, and several studies have found that they cause approximately 20% of injuries that occur in medical institutions. It was found that the rate of adverse drug events (ADEs) in pediatric hospitalizations ranges from 11 to 40 events per 100 hospitalizations and 1% of cases caused death.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a comparative and retrospective study. The overarching objective is to adapt the Pediatric Trigger Tool (PTT) of the \\\"Child Health Corporation of America\\\" to pediatric wards in Israel, with the intention of using it to assess the rate of adverse events that occur during medication given in pediatric wards. The study characterized ADEs and examined the ability of the PTT to identify ADEs in relation to those that were voluntarily reported by the staff.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study included internal and surgical pediatric wards at an academic pediatric medical center. The PTT was validated on medical record data from 700 hospitalizations between the years 2015 and 2017. The study also determined, among other things: the stage of drug administration at which the events occurred, the percentage of all events that could have been prevented, the degrees of damage the ADE caused and more.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Positive Predictive Value of the customized tool stands at 16.91%. The study found 108 ADEs in 78 hospitalizations. The ADE rate per 100 hospitalizations was 15.4, the ADE rate per 1000 drug doses was 3.9, and the ADE rate per 1000 hospitalization days was 22.8, of which 18.5% were preventable. The category of drugs that led to the highest number of ADEs was painkillers. Those ADEs led to a large number of adverse clinical effects: constipation, hypokalemia, vomiting, and rash. The most common reason for coming to the hospital was suspicion or treatment of a hematologic disease, followed by hospitalization due to a burn. The customized tool found 10.8 times more ADEs than those reported voluntarily-subjectively by the clinical staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that, properly adapted, the PTT tool can be used to detect ADEs in internal and surgical pediatric wards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Quality in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Quality in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物是医院患者伤害的主要原因,一些研究发现,在医疗机构发生的伤害中,药物造成的伤害约占20%。研究发现,儿科住院的药物不良事件(ADEs)发生率为每100例住院11至40例,其中1%的病例导致死亡。目的:这是一项比较和回顾性研究。总体目标是将“美国儿童健康公司”的儿科触发工具(PTT)应用于以色列的儿科病房,目的是用它来评估儿科病房用药期间发生的不良事件的发生率。该研究描述了ade的特征,并检查了PTT识别ade与工作人员自愿报告的ade的能力。方法:本研究包括某学术儿科医学中心的内科和外科儿科病房。PTT是根据2015年至2017年间700例住院治疗的病历数据进行验证的。除其他事项外,该研究还确定了:事件发生的给药阶段,所有事件可以预防的百分比,ADE造成的损害程度等等。结果:定制工具的阳性预测值(PPV)为16.91%。该研究在78例住院治疗中发现108例ade。每100次住院的ADE率为15.4,每1000剂药物的ADE率为3.9,每1000个住院日的ADE率为22.8,其中18.5%是可预防的。导致ade发生率最高的药物类别是止痛药。这些不良事件导致了大量的临床不良反应:便秘、低钾血症、呕吐和皮疹。到医院就诊的最常见原因是怀疑或治疗血液病,其次是因烧伤住院。定制工具发现的ade是临床工作人员自愿主观报告的10.8倍。结论:本研究发现,适当调整后,PTT工具可用于检测儿科内科和外科病房的ade。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing and validating a Global Trigger Tool for assessing frequency, level of harm, and preventability of adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients units.

Background: Medications are a major cause of harm to patients in hospitals, and several studies have found that they cause approximately 20% of injuries that occur in medical institutions. It was found that the rate of adverse drug events (ADEs) in pediatric hospitalizations ranges from 11 to 40 events per 100 hospitalizations and 1% of cases caused death.

Objectives: This is a comparative and retrospective study. The overarching objective is to adapt the Pediatric Trigger Tool (PTT) of the "Child Health Corporation of America" to pediatric wards in Israel, with the intention of using it to assess the rate of adverse events that occur during medication given in pediatric wards. The study characterized ADEs and examined the ability of the PTT to identify ADEs in relation to those that were voluntarily reported by the staff.

Method: This study included internal and surgical pediatric wards at an academic pediatric medical center. The PTT was validated on medical record data from 700 hospitalizations between the years 2015 and 2017. The study also determined, among other things: the stage of drug administration at which the events occurred, the percentage of all events that could have been prevented, the degrees of damage the ADE caused and more.

Results: The Positive Predictive Value of the customized tool stands at 16.91%. The study found 108 ADEs in 78 hospitalizations. The ADE rate per 100 hospitalizations was 15.4, the ADE rate per 1000 drug doses was 3.9, and the ADE rate per 1000 hospitalization days was 22.8, of which 18.5% were preventable. The category of drugs that led to the highest number of ADEs was painkillers. Those ADEs led to a large number of adverse clinical effects: constipation, hypokalemia, vomiting, and rash. The most common reason for coming to the hospital was suspicion or treatment of a hematologic disease, followed by hospitalization due to a burn. The customized tool found 10.8 times more ADEs than those reported voluntarily-subjectively by the clinical staff.

Conclusions: The study found that, properly adapted, the PTT tool can be used to detect ADEs in internal and surgical pediatric wards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信