通过非负矩阵分解揭示食物对农药残留的耐受模式。

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Suyu Mei
{"title":"通过非负矩阵分解揭示食物对农药残留的耐受模式。","authors":"Suyu Mei","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gaining knowledge about the maximum residue limits (MALs) of pesticides on fresh or processed foods is critical to the process of pre-harvest cultivation, post-harvest processing and storage, and the downstream safety surveillance of food commodities. In this study, we explore the available MALs of 643 pesticides on 128 foods via non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and hierarchical clustering to gain insights into the patterns of how similar pesticides exhibit similar MALs profiles on foods. Meanwhile, NMF predicts the MALs for untested foods via the implicitly-learnt patterns without conducting in vivo testing that potentially violates ethic regulations. Clustering results show that foods with closer NMF weights commonly exhibit closer residue tolerance profiles, and pesticides with closer MALs profiles exhibit higher structural similarities. These patterns help food experts to assess the MALs of pesticides concerned on untested foods, and the determination of MRLs on foods has its mechanistic basis. Using the reverse process of NMF decomposition, we provide the predicted MALs for 24.31% pesticide-food pairs, and NMF achieves 0.9 <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> on more than 75.78% foods in terms of recreating the experimental MALs values. Only 8.6% foods achieve less than 0.7 <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>. These predicted MALs are supposed to provide practical or theoretical reference to benefit the surveillance of pesticide applications and food safety control.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unravelling patterns of food tolerance to pesticide residues via non-negative matrix factorization\",\"authors\":\"Suyu Mei\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Gaining knowledge about the maximum residue limits (MALs) of pesticides on fresh or processed foods is critical to the process of pre-harvest cultivation, post-harvest processing and storage, and the downstream safety surveillance of food commodities. In this study, we explore the available MALs of 643 pesticides on 128 foods via non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and hierarchical clustering to gain insights into the patterns of how similar pesticides exhibit similar MALs profiles on foods. Meanwhile, NMF predicts the MALs for untested foods via the implicitly-learnt patterns without conducting in vivo testing that potentially violates ethic regulations. Clustering results show that foods with closer NMF weights commonly exhibit closer residue tolerance profiles, and pesticides with closer MALs profiles exhibit higher structural similarities. These patterns help food experts to assess the MALs of pesticides concerned on untested foods, and the determination of MRLs on foods has its mechanistic basis. Using the reverse process of NMF decomposition, we provide the predicted MALs for 24.31% pesticide-food pairs, and NMF achieves 0.9 <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> on more than 75.78% foods in terms of recreating the experimental MALs values. Only 8.6% foods achieve less than 0.7 <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>. These predicted MALs are supposed to provide practical or theoretical reference to benefit the surveillance of pesticide applications and food safety control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解新鲜或加工食品中农药的最大残留限量(MALs)对收获前种植、收获后加工和储存过程以及食品商品的下游安全监测至关重要。在这项研究中,我们通过非负矩阵分解(NMF)和分层聚类分析,探索了643种农药在128种食品上的可用MALs,以深入了解相似农药在食品上表现出相似MALs的模式。同时,NMF通过内隐学习模式来预测未测试食品的MALs,而不进行可能违反伦理法规的体内测试。聚类结果表明,NMF权重越近的食品通常表现出更接近的残留耐受性特征,而MALs特征越近的农药表现出更高的结构相似性。这些模式有助于食品专家评估有关农药在未经检测的食品上的最大残留限量,食品最大残留限量的测定有其机理基础。利用NMF反向分解的方法,我们对24.31%的农药-食品对提供了预测的MALs,在重现实验MALs值方面,NMF在75.78%以上的食品上达到0.9 R2。只有8.6%的食物的R2值低于0.7。这些预测结果可为农药应用监测和食品安全控制提供理论或实践参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unravelling patterns of food tolerance to pesticide residues via non-negative matrix factorization

Gaining knowledge about the maximum residue limits (MALs) of pesticides on fresh or processed foods is critical to the process of pre-harvest cultivation, post-harvest processing and storage, and the downstream safety surveillance of food commodities. In this study, we explore the available MALs of 643 pesticides on 128 foods via non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and hierarchical clustering to gain insights into the patterns of how similar pesticides exhibit similar MALs profiles on foods. Meanwhile, NMF predicts the MALs for untested foods via the implicitly-learnt patterns without conducting in vivo testing that potentially violates ethic regulations. Clustering results show that foods with closer NMF weights commonly exhibit closer residue tolerance profiles, and pesticides with closer MALs profiles exhibit higher structural similarities. These patterns help food experts to assess the MALs of pesticides concerned on untested foods, and the determination of MRLs on foods has its mechanistic basis. Using the reverse process of NMF decomposition, we provide the predicted MALs for 24.31% pesticide-food pairs, and NMF achieves 0.9 R2 on more than 75.78% foods in terms of recreating the experimental MALs values. Only 8.6% foods achieve less than 0.7 R2. These predicted MALs are supposed to provide practical or theoretical reference to benefit the surveillance of pesticide applications and food safety control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信