前交叉韧带重建后恢复运动-预后因素和预后模型:系统回顾。

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Inge E.P.M. van Haren , Maarten P. van der Worp , Rogier van Rijn , Janine H. Stubbe , Robert E.H. van Cingel , André L.M. Verbeek , Philip J. van der Wees , J. Bart Staal
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建后恢复运动-预后因素和预后模型:系统回顾。","authors":"Inge E.P.M. van Haren ,&nbsp;Maarten P. van der Worp ,&nbsp;Rogier van Rijn ,&nbsp;Janine H. Stubbe ,&nbsp;Robert E.H. van Cingel ,&nbsp;André L.M. Verbeek ,&nbsp;Philip J. van der Wees ,&nbsp;J. Bart Staal","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A variety of criteria are used to make return to sport decisions after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review summarized and evaluated prognostic factors and clinical prognostic models for returning to sports after ACL reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Independent pairs of reviewers assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias and certainty of evidence. A systematic literature search was conducted in key electronic databases. Inclusion criteria: studies published in English, longitudinal cohort or case-control design, reporting outcomes on return to sport or Tegner Activity Score (TAS), participants aged ≥16 years undergoing primary ACL reconstruction, and defined as athletes/sport players or having a pre-injury TAS ≥5. Only associations between predictors and outcomes that were analyzed in ≥3 studies and had consistent results in the same direction in ≥75 % of the studies were considered and reported. Risk of bias was evaluated using the QUIPS or PROBAST tools, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>37 studies (5 low, 6 moderate, and 26 high risk of bias) on prognostic factors and 1 study on prognostic models (low risk of bias), representing 6278 participants, were included. Six prognostic factors were identified and rated as very low certainty evidence: fewer concomitant meniscal injuries, shorter time between injury and surgery, higher jump test scores, better physical functioning, higher muscle strength, and greater psychological readiness to return to sport. Two prognostic models with AUC 0.77–0.78 and 70 % accuracy for predicting return to sport were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a very low certainty of evidence that returning to sport is associated with both physical, psychological and demographic prognostic factors. More methodologically sound research on prognostic factors and prognostic models for return to sport in athletes after ACL reconstruction is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"68 3","pages":"Article 101921"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - prognostic factors and prognostic models: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Inge E.P.M. van Haren ,&nbsp;Maarten P. van der Worp ,&nbsp;Rogier van Rijn ,&nbsp;Janine H. Stubbe ,&nbsp;Robert E.H. van Cingel ,&nbsp;André L.M. Verbeek ,&nbsp;Philip J. van der Wees ,&nbsp;J. Bart Staal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A variety of criteria are used to make return to sport decisions after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review summarized and evaluated prognostic factors and clinical prognostic models for returning to sports after ACL reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Independent pairs of reviewers assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias and certainty of evidence. A systematic literature search was conducted in key electronic databases. Inclusion criteria: studies published in English, longitudinal cohort or case-control design, reporting outcomes on return to sport or Tegner Activity Score (TAS), participants aged ≥16 years undergoing primary ACL reconstruction, and defined as athletes/sport players or having a pre-injury TAS ≥5. Only associations between predictors and outcomes that were analyzed in ≥3 studies and had consistent results in the same direction in ≥75 % of the studies were considered and reported. Risk of bias was evaluated using the QUIPS or PROBAST tools, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>37 studies (5 low, 6 moderate, and 26 high risk of bias) on prognostic factors and 1 study on prognostic models (low risk of bias), representing 6278 participants, were included. Six prognostic factors were identified and rated as very low certainty evidence: fewer concomitant meniscal injuries, shorter time between injury and surgery, higher jump test scores, better physical functioning, higher muscle strength, and greater psychological readiness to return to sport. Two prognostic models with AUC 0.77–0.78 and 70 % accuracy for predicting return to sport were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a very low certainty of evidence that returning to sport is associated with both physical, psychological and demographic prognostic factors. More methodologically sound research on prognostic factors and prognostic models for return to sport in athletes after ACL reconstruction is needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065724001040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065724001040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后,有多种标准用于决定是否恢复运动。目的:本系统综述总结和评估前交叉韧带重建后恢复运动的预后因素和临床预后模型。方法:由独立的评论者对入选资格进行评估,提取数据,评估偏倚风险和证据的确定性。在重点电子数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。纳入标准:以英文发表的研究,纵向队列或病例对照设计,报告恢复运动或Tegner活动评分(TAS)的结果,参与者年龄≥16岁,接受初级ACL重建,定义为运动员/运动运动员或损伤前TAS≥5。只有在≥3项研究中分析的预测因子和结果之间的关联,并且在≥75%的研究中具有相同方向的一致结果才被考虑和报告。使用QUIPS或PROBAST工具评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE框架评估证据的确定性。结果:纳入了37项关于预后因素的研究(5项低偏倚、6项中等偏倚和26项高风险偏倚)和1项关于预后模型的研究(低偏倚风险),共6278名受试者。确定了六个预后因素,并将其评为非常低确定性证据:较少的伴有半月板损伤,更短的损伤和手术之间的时间,更高的跳跃测试分数,更好的身体功能,更高的肌肉力量和更大的心理准备重返运动。确定了AUC分别为0.77-0.78和70%准确度的两种预测重返运动的预测模型。结论:回归运动与身体、心理和人口预测因素相关的证据确定性非常低。需要对ACL重建后运动员恢复运动的预后因素和预后模型进行更多方法学上合理的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - prognostic factors and prognostic models: A systematic review

Background

A variety of criteria are used to make return to sport decisions after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Objectives

This systematic review summarized and evaluated prognostic factors and clinical prognostic models for returning to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Independent pairs of reviewers assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias and certainty of evidence. A systematic literature search was conducted in key electronic databases. Inclusion criteria: studies published in English, longitudinal cohort or case-control design, reporting outcomes on return to sport or Tegner Activity Score (TAS), participants aged ≥16 years undergoing primary ACL reconstruction, and defined as athletes/sport players or having a pre-injury TAS ≥5. Only associations between predictors and outcomes that were analyzed in ≥3 studies and had consistent results in the same direction in ≥75 % of the studies were considered and reported. Risk of bias was evaluated using the QUIPS or PROBAST tools, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework.

Results

37 studies (5 low, 6 moderate, and 26 high risk of bias) on prognostic factors and 1 study on prognostic models (low risk of bias), representing 6278 participants, were included. Six prognostic factors were identified and rated as very low certainty evidence: fewer concomitant meniscal injuries, shorter time between injury and surgery, higher jump test scores, better physical functioning, higher muscle strength, and greater psychological readiness to return to sport. Two prognostic models with AUC 0.77–0.78 and 70 % accuracy for predicting return to sport were identified.

Conclusion

There is a very low certainty of evidence that returning to sport is associated with both physical, psychological and demographic prognostic factors. More methodologically sound research on prognostic factors and prognostic models for return to sport in athletes after ACL reconstruction is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信