PubMed Central文章全文中试验注册编号的分布:将试验与出版物链接和索引试验出版物类型的含义。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08741-w
Arthur M Holt, Ang Michael Troy, Neil R Smalheiser
{"title":"PubMed Central文章全文中试验注册编号的分布:将试验与出版物链接和索引试验出版物类型的含义。","authors":"Arthur M Holt, Ang Michael Troy, Neil R Smalheiser","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08741-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Linking registered clinical trials with their published results continues to be a challenge. A variety of natural language processing (NLP)-based and machine learning-based models have been developed to assist users in identifying these connections. To date, however, no system has attempted to detect mentions of registry numbers within the full-text of articles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles from the PubMed Central full-text Open Access dataset were scanned for mentions of ClinicalTrials.gov and international clinical trial registry identifiers. We analyzed the distribution of trial registry numbers within sections of the articles and characterized their publication type indexing and other metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Registry numbers mentioned in article metadata (e.g., the abstract) or in the Methods section of full-text are highly predictive of clinical trial articles. When a clinical trial article mentioned ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers (NCT) only in the Methods section, in every case examined, it was reporting clinical outcomes from that registered trial, and thus can reliably be used to link that trial to that publication. Conversely, registry numbers mentioned in Tables arise almost entirely from reviews (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Registry numbers mentioned in other full-text sections have relatively little predictive value for linking trials to their publications. Clinical trial articles that mention CONSORT or SPIRIT guidelines have a higher rate of mentioning registry numbers in article metadata, and hence are more easily linked to their underlying trials, than articles overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The appearance and location of trial registry numbers within the full-text of biomedical articles provide valuable features for connecting clinical trials to their publications. They also potentially provide information to assist automated tools in assigning publication types to articles.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distribution of trial registry numbers within full-text of PubMed Central articles: implications for linking trials to publications and indexing trial publication types.\",\"authors\":\"Arthur M Holt, Ang Michael Troy, Neil R Smalheiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-08741-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Linking registered clinical trials with their published results continues to be a challenge. A variety of natural language processing (NLP)-based and machine learning-based models have been developed to assist users in identifying these connections. To date, however, no system has attempted to detect mentions of registry numbers within the full-text of articles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles from the PubMed Central full-text Open Access dataset were scanned for mentions of ClinicalTrials.gov and international clinical trial registry identifiers. We analyzed the distribution of trial registry numbers within sections of the articles and characterized their publication type indexing and other metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Registry numbers mentioned in article metadata (e.g., the abstract) or in the Methods section of full-text are highly predictive of clinical trial articles. When a clinical trial article mentioned ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers (NCT) only in the Methods section, in every case examined, it was reporting clinical outcomes from that registered trial, and thus can reliably be used to link that trial to that publication. Conversely, registry numbers mentioned in Tables arise almost entirely from reviews (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Registry numbers mentioned in other full-text sections have relatively little predictive value for linking trials to their publications. Clinical trial articles that mention CONSORT or SPIRIT guidelines have a higher rate of mentioning registry numbers in article metadata, and hence are more easily linked to their underlying trials, than articles overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The appearance and location of trial registry numbers within the full-text of biomedical articles provide valuable features for connecting clinical trials to their publications. They also potentially provide information to assist automated tools in assigning publication types to articles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783733/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08741-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08741-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:将注册的临床试验与其发表的结果联系起来仍然是一个挑战。已经开发了各种基于自然语言处理(NLP)和基于机器学习的模型来帮助用户识别这些连接。然而,到目前为止,还没有任何系统试图检测文章全文中提到的注册表号。方法:扫描PubMed Central全文开放获取数据集中的文章,查找ClinicalTrials.gov和国际临床试验注册标识符。我们分析了文章部分的试验注册编号分布,并描述了它们的出版类型、索引和其他指标。结果:文章元数据(例如摘要)或全文方法部分中提到的注册编号对临床试验文章具有高度预测性。当一篇临床试验文章只在方法部分提到ClinicalTrials.gov识别码(NCT)时,在每一个被检查的病例中,它都报告了该注册试验的临床结果,因此可以可靠地将该试验与该出版物联系起来。相反,表中提到的注册表号几乎完全来自于回顾(包括系统回顾和元分析)。在其他全文部分中提到的注册编号对于将试验与其出版物联系起来的预测价值相对较小。提到CONSORT或SPIRIT指南的临床试验文章在文章元数据中提到注册编号的比例更高,因此比所有文章更容易与它们的基础试验联系起来。结论:生物医学文章全文中试验注册编号的出现和位置为将临床试验与其出版物联系起来提供了有价值的特征。它们还可能提供信息,以帮助自动工具为文章分配发布类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distribution of trial registry numbers within full-text of PubMed Central articles: implications for linking trials to publications and indexing trial publication types.

Background: Linking registered clinical trials with their published results continues to be a challenge. A variety of natural language processing (NLP)-based and machine learning-based models have been developed to assist users in identifying these connections. To date, however, no system has attempted to detect mentions of registry numbers within the full-text of articles.

Methods: Articles from the PubMed Central full-text Open Access dataset were scanned for mentions of ClinicalTrials.gov and international clinical trial registry identifiers. We analyzed the distribution of trial registry numbers within sections of the articles and characterized their publication type indexing and other metrics.

Results: Registry numbers mentioned in article metadata (e.g., the abstract) or in the Methods section of full-text are highly predictive of clinical trial articles. When a clinical trial article mentioned ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers (NCT) only in the Methods section, in every case examined, it was reporting clinical outcomes from that registered trial, and thus can reliably be used to link that trial to that publication. Conversely, registry numbers mentioned in Tables arise almost entirely from reviews (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Registry numbers mentioned in other full-text sections have relatively little predictive value for linking trials to their publications. Clinical trial articles that mention CONSORT or SPIRIT guidelines have a higher rate of mentioning registry numbers in article metadata, and hence are more easily linked to their underlying trials, than articles overall.

Conclusions: The appearance and location of trial registry numbers within the full-text of biomedical articles provide valuable features for connecting clinical trials to their publications. They also potentially provide information to assist automated tools in assigning publication types to articles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信