在术前前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描阴性的前列腺癌患者中,nomogram鉴别盆腔淋巴结清扫候者的外部验证。

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco Barletta, Simone Scuderi, Pietro Scilipoti, Pawel Rajwa, Nicolai A Huebner, Juan Gomez Rivas, Laura Ibanez, Timo F W Soeterik, Lorenzo Bianchi, Agostino Mattei, Claudia Kesch, Christopher Darr, Hongqian Guo, Junlong Zhuang, Fabio Zattoni, Wolfgang P Fendler, Giancarlo Marra, Armando Stabile, Daniele Robesti, Daniele Amparore, Steven Joniau, Riccardo Schiavina, Jesus Moreno Sierra, Francesco Porpiglia, Maria Picchio, Arturo Chiti, Alexandre Mottrie, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Shahrokh F Shariat, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti
{"title":"在术前前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描阴性的前列腺癌患者中,nomogram鉴别盆腔淋巴结清扫候者的外部验证。","authors":"Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco Barletta, Simone Scuderi, Pietro Scilipoti, Pawel Rajwa, Nicolai A Huebner, Juan Gomez Rivas, Laura Ibanez, Timo F W Soeterik, Lorenzo Bianchi, Agostino Mattei, Claudia Kesch, Christopher Darr, Hongqian Guo, Junlong Zhuang, Fabio Zattoni, Wolfgang P Fendler, Giancarlo Marra, Armando Stabile, Daniele Robesti, Daniele Amparore, Steven Joniau, Riccardo Schiavina, Jesus Moreno Sierra, Francesco Porpiglia, Maria Picchio, Arturo Chiti, Alexandre Mottrie, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Shahrokh F Shariat, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is recommended in selected radical prostatectomy (RP) prostate cancer (PCa) patients for staging purposes. We aim to externally validate available tools to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) in men with negative preoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (miN0).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 282 intermediate- to high-risk PCa patients with miN0 disease undergoing RP and ePLND at ten centers between 2016 and 2023 were identified. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC); Amsterdam-Brisbane-Sydney; and Briganti 2017, 2019, and 2023 tools predicting LNI were validated externally using calibration plots, C-indexes, and decision-curve analyses to assess calibration, discrimination, and net benefit.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Overall, 36 (13%) patients had LNI. The C-indexes of the MSKCC, Briganti 2017, Briganti 2019, Amsterdam-Brisbane-Sydney, and Briganti 2023 nomograms were 64%, 69%, 72%, 64%, and 77%, respectively. The Briganti 2023 nomogram exhibited higher net benefit than the other available nomograms, and the use of a 5% cutoff would have spared 47% ePLND procedures (vs 14% and 4.3% for the Briganti 2019 and Amsterdam-Brisbane-Sydney nomograms, respectively) at the cost of missing only five (3.8%) LNI cases. Heterogeneity in patient selection and imaging protocols represents the main limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The Briganti 2023 nomogram outperformed other available tools in predicting LNI in men with miN0 PCa. The use of this tool resulted in a considerable number of unnecessary ePLND procedures spared and optimization of ePLND recommendations in a contemporary clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Validation of Nomograms for the Identification of Pelvic Nodal Dissection Candidates Among Prostate Cancer Patients with Negative Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco Barletta, Simone Scuderi, Pietro Scilipoti, Pawel Rajwa, Nicolai A Huebner, Juan Gomez Rivas, Laura Ibanez, Timo F W Soeterik, Lorenzo Bianchi, Agostino Mattei, Claudia Kesch, Christopher Darr, Hongqian Guo, Junlong Zhuang, Fabio Zattoni, Wolfgang P Fendler, Giancarlo Marra, Armando Stabile, Daniele Robesti, Daniele Amparore, Steven Joniau, Riccardo Schiavina, Jesus Moreno Sierra, Francesco Porpiglia, Maria Picchio, Arturo Chiti, Alexandre Mottrie, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Shahrokh F Shariat, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is recommended in selected radical prostatectomy (RP) prostate cancer (PCa) patients for staging purposes. We aim to externally validate available tools to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) in men with negative preoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (miN0).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 282 intermediate- to high-risk PCa patients with miN0 disease undergoing RP and ePLND at ten centers between 2016 and 2023 were identified. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC); Amsterdam-Brisbane-Sydney; and Briganti 2017, 2019, and 2023 tools predicting LNI were validated externally using calibration plots, C-indexes, and decision-curve analyses to assess calibration, discrimination, and net benefit.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Overall, 36 (13%) patients had LNI. The C-indexes of the MSKCC, Briganti 2017, Briganti 2019, Amsterdam-Brisbane-Sydney, and Briganti 2023 nomograms were 64%, 69%, 72%, 64%, and 77%, respectively. The Briganti 2023 nomogram exhibited higher net benefit than the other available nomograms, and the use of a 5% cutoff would have spared 47% ePLND procedures (vs 14% and 4.3% for the Briganti 2019 and Amsterdam-Brisbane-Sydney nomograms, respectively) at the cost of missing only five (3.8%) LNI cases. Heterogeneity in patient selection and imaging protocols represents the main limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The Briganti 2023 nomogram outperformed other available tools in predicting LNI in men with miN0 PCa. The use of this tool resulted in a considerable number of unnecessary ePLND procedures spared and optimization of ePLND recommendations in a contemporary clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.01.004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.01.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:在选择性根治性前列腺切除术(RP)前列腺癌(PCa)患者中,推荐采用扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)进行分期。我们的目标是从外部验证可用的工具来预测术前前列腺特异性膜抗原阴性的男性淋巴结侵袭(LNI)。方法:总体而言,2016年至2023年间,在10个中心确定了282例中高风险的miN0型PCa患者接受RP和ePLND。纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC);Amsterdam-Brisbane-Sydney;和Briganti 2017、2019和2023预测LNI的工具使用校准图、c指数和决策曲线分析进行外部验证,以评估校准、判别和净效益。主要发现和局限性:总体而言,36例(13%)患者患有LNI。MSKCC、Briganti 2017、Briganti 2019、阿姆斯特丹-布里斯班-悉尼和Briganti 2023的c指数分别为64%、69%、72%、64%和77%。与其他可用的nomogram相比,Briganti 2023 nomogram表现出更高的净效益,并且使用5%的截止值将节省47%的ePLND程序(Briganti 2019和阿姆斯特丹-布里斯班-悉尼nomogram分别为14%和4.3%),其代价是仅遗漏5例(3.8%)LNI病例。患者选择和成像方案的异质性是主要的局限性。结论和临床意义:Briganti 2023 nomogram在预测miN0型PCa患者LNI方面优于其他可用工具。该工具的使用使大量不必要的ePLND手术得以避免,并在当代临床环境中优化了ePLND建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External Validation of Nomograms for the Identification of Pelvic Nodal Dissection Candidates Among Prostate Cancer Patients with Negative Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography.

Background and objective: Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is recommended in selected radical prostatectomy (RP) prostate cancer (PCa) patients for staging purposes. We aim to externally validate available tools to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) in men with negative preoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (miN0).

Methods: Overall, 282 intermediate- to high-risk PCa patients with miN0 disease undergoing RP and ePLND at ten centers between 2016 and 2023 were identified. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC); Amsterdam-Brisbane-Sydney; and Briganti 2017, 2019, and 2023 tools predicting LNI were validated externally using calibration plots, C-indexes, and decision-curve analyses to assess calibration, discrimination, and net benefit.

Key findings and limitations: Overall, 36 (13%) patients had LNI. The C-indexes of the MSKCC, Briganti 2017, Briganti 2019, Amsterdam-Brisbane-Sydney, and Briganti 2023 nomograms were 64%, 69%, 72%, 64%, and 77%, respectively. The Briganti 2023 nomogram exhibited higher net benefit than the other available nomograms, and the use of a 5% cutoff would have spared 47% ePLND procedures (vs 14% and 4.3% for the Briganti 2019 and Amsterdam-Brisbane-Sydney nomograms, respectively) at the cost of missing only five (3.8%) LNI cases. Heterogeneity in patient selection and imaging protocols represents the main limitations.

Conclusions and clinical implications: The Briganti 2023 nomogram outperformed other available tools in predicting LNI in men with miN0 PCa. The use of this tool resulted in a considerable number of unnecessary ePLND procedures spared and optimization of ePLND recommendations in a contemporary clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信