职场护士偏见(WPtN):量表开发与验证。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Advances in Nursing Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000533
Miranda P Kaye, Cheryl Dellasega, D Adriana Andreae
{"title":"职场护士偏见(WPtN):量表开发与验证。","authors":"Miranda P Kaye, Cheryl Dellasega, D Adriana Andreae","doi":"10.1097/ANS.0000000000000533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring and understanding experiences of workplace prejudice faced by underrepresented nurses comprise a first step toward workplace equality and enhanced morale and retention. With no existing instruments to measure prejudice directed toward nurses, the primary goal of the current study was to report the results and validation of the newly developed Workplace Prejudice toward Nurses (WPtN) scale. Participants (1692 nurses, 65% whom identified as an underrepresented racial or ethnic group) completed an online survey assessing WPtN. Participants reported on the types and frequency of WPtN they experienced, who directed the prejudice toward them, and the impact it caused on their job satisfaction and retention. Results supported the fit of a 1-factor model assessing general workplace prejudice, and 4-factor model comprising WPtN directed from different groups (ie, patients, their family members, coworkers, and administrators). More than one-third (34%) of participants reported experiencing WPtN. Those reporting WPtN indicated this prejudice was directed toward them from patients (45%), family members (41%), coworkers (42%), and administrators (14%). Experiencing WPtN negatively impacted job satisfaction and retention. Together, findings indicate that the WPtN scale is a reliable measure of WPtN of underrepresented backgrounds. The development of this tool is an important step to combating prejudiced behavior and attitudes, which can often be covert and difficult to validate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50857,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nursing Science","volume":"48 1","pages":"64-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace Prejudice Toward Nurses (WPtN): Scale Development and Validation.\",\"authors\":\"Miranda P Kaye, Cheryl Dellasega, D Adriana Andreae\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANS.0000000000000533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measuring and understanding experiences of workplace prejudice faced by underrepresented nurses comprise a first step toward workplace equality and enhanced morale and retention. With no existing instruments to measure prejudice directed toward nurses, the primary goal of the current study was to report the results and validation of the newly developed Workplace Prejudice toward Nurses (WPtN) scale. Participants (1692 nurses, 65% whom identified as an underrepresented racial or ethnic group) completed an online survey assessing WPtN. Participants reported on the types and frequency of WPtN they experienced, who directed the prejudice toward them, and the impact it caused on their job satisfaction and retention. Results supported the fit of a 1-factor model assessing general workplace prejudice, and 4-factor model comprising WPtN directed from different groups (ie, patients, their family members, coworkers, and administrators). More than one-third (34%) of participants reported experiencing WPtN. Those reporting WPtN indicated this prejudice was directed toward them from patients (45%), family members (41%), coworkers (42%), and administrators (14%). Experiencing WPtN negatively impacted job satisfaction and retention. Together, findings indicate that the WPtN scale is a reliable measure of WPtN of underrepresented backgrounds. The development of this tool is an important step to combating prejudiced behavior and attitudes, which can often be covert and difficult to validate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Nursing Science\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"64-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Nursing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000533\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

衡量和了解代表性不足的护士所面临的工作场所偏见经历,是实现工作场所平等和提高士气和留住员工的第一步。由于没有现成的工具来测量针对护士的偏见,本研究的主要目的是报告新开发的工作场所对护士的偏见(WPtN)量表的结果和验证。参与者(1692名护士,65%被确定为代表性不足的种族或族裔群体)完成了评估WPtN的在线调查。参与者报告了他们所经历的WPtN的类型和频率,谁对他们造成了偏见,以及它对他们的工作满意度和保留率造成的影响。结果支持评估一般职场偏见的1因素模型的拟合性,以及包含不同群体(即患者、其家属、同事和管理人员)的WPtN的4因素模型的拟合性。超过三分之一(34%)的参与者报告经历过WPtN。那些报告WPtN的人表示,这种偏见直接来自患者(45%)、家庭成员(41%)、同事(42%)和管理人员(14%)。经历WPtN会对工作满意度和留任产生负面影响。总之,研究结果表明,WPtN量表是一个可靠的衡量代表性不足背景的WPtN。这一工具的开发是打击偏见行为和态度的重要一步,偏见行为和态度往往是隐蔽的,难以证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workplace Prejudice Toward Nurses (WPtN): Scale Development and Validation.

Measuring and understanding experiences of workplace prejudice faced by underrepresented nurses comprise a first step toward workplace equality and enhanced morale and retention. With no existing instruments to measure prejudice directed toward nurses, the primary goal of the current study was to report the results and validation of the newly developed Workplace Prejudice toward Nurses (WPtN) scale. Participants (1692 nurses, 65% whom identified as an underrepresented racial or ethnic group) completed an online survey assessing WPtN. Participants reported on the types and frequency of WPtN they experienced, who directed the prejudice toward them, and the impact it caused on their job satisfaction and retention. Results supported the fit of a 1-factor model assessing general workplace prejudice, and 4-factor model comprising WPtN directed from different groups (ie, patients, their family members, coworkers, and administrators). More than one-third (34%) of participants reported experiencing WPtN. Those reporting WPtN indicated this prejudice was directed toward them from patients (45%), family members (41%), coworkers (42%), and administrators (14%). Experiencing WPtN negatively impacted job satisfaction and retention. Together, findings indicate that the WPtN scale is a reliable measure of WPtN of underrepresented backgrounds. The development of this tool is an important step to combating prejudiced behavior and attitudes, which can often be covert and difficult to validate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
93
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Consistently ranked as one of the most-read and most assigned journals by faculties of graduate programs in nursing, Advances in Nursing Science (ANS) is intellectually challenging, innovative and progressive, and features articles from a wide range of scholarly traditions. The journal particularly encourages works that speak to the need for global sustainability and that take an intersectional approach, recognizing class, color, sexual and gender identity, and other dimensions of human experience related to health. Articles in ANS are peer-reviewed and chosen for their pioneering perspectives and for their significance in contributing the evolution of the discipline of nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信