Jean-Luc K Kabangu, Danny L Fowler, John Dugan, Amanda Hernandez, Delaney Graham, Takara Newsome-Cuby, Momodou G Bah, Sonia V Eden
{"title":"评估美国神经外科住院医师计划网站上的多样性、公平性和包容性信息。","authors":"Jean-Luc K Kabangu, Danny L Fowler, John Dugan, Amanda Hernandez, Delaney Graham, Takara Newsome-Cuby, Momodou G Bah, Sonia V Eden","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.JNS241585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) information on neurosurgery residency program websites and examine the association between program size, ranking, and DEI information presence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional review of 115 US neurosurgery residency program websites was conducted from January 1 to March 2, 2024. Websites were evaluated based on six DEI criteria: 1) diversity commitment in mission/leadership statements, 2) separate diversity mission statement, 3) rotations/fellowships for underrepresented minority students, 4) diversity initiatives, 5) diversity page/section, and 6) appointed diversity leadership positions. Associations between program size, ranking, and DEI information were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 115 programs, only 35 (30.43%) met at least one DEI criterion. Specifically, 18.26% had a separate diversity mission statement and 15.65% included a DEI statement in mission/leadership messages. Programs with more than 13 residents were significantly more likely to meet at least one DEI criterion (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.16-7.56; p = 0.022) and to include a DEI statement in mission/leadership messages (OR 5.38, 95% CI 1.71-24.72; p = 0.018). Top 25-ranked programs by U.S. News & World Report were more likely to have diversity initiatives (OR 6.23, 95% CI 1.78-23.97; p = 0.007). Programs meeting any DEI criterion had a higher percentage of female (29.67% vs 22.55%, p = 0.013) and Black (7.85% vs 4.49%, p = 0.019) residents. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of White residents (p = 0.206) across programs, and programs with a mention of DEI in the mission statement had a lower percentage of Asian residents (24.08% vs 33.29%, p = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most US neurosurgery residency programs lack DEI information on their websites. Larger programs and those with higher rankings are more likely to include DEI content, particularly standalone statements. Programs meeting DEI criteria tend to have a higher representation of female and Black residents. These findings highlight the need for greater transparency and commitment to DEI in neurosurgery residency programs, ensuring prospective applicants have access to comprehensive DEI information.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of diversity, equity, and inclusion information on US neurosurgery residency program websites.\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Luc K Kabangu, Danny L Fowler, John Dugan, Amanda Hernandez, Delaney Graham, Takara Newsome-Cuby, Momodou G Bah, Sonia V Eden\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.9.JNS241585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) information on neurosurgery residency program websites and examine the association between program size, ranking, and DEI information presence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional review of 115 US neurosurgery residency program websites was conducted from January 1 to March 2, 2024. Websites were evaluated based on six DEI criteria: 1) diversity commitment in mission/leadership statements, 2) separate diversity mission statement, 3) rotations/fellowships for underrepresented minority students, 4) diversity initiatives, 5) diversity page/section, and 6) appointed diversity leadership positions. Associations between program size, ranking, and DEI information were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 115 programs, only 35 (30.43%) met at least one DEI criterion. Specifically, 18.26% had a separate diversity mission statement and 15.65% included a DEI statement in mission/leadership messages. Programs with more than 13 residents were significantly more likely to meet at least one DEI criterion (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.16-7.56; p = 0.022) and to include a DEI statement in mission/leadership messages (OR 5.38, 95% CI 1.71-24.72; p = 0.018). Top 25-ranked programs by U.S. News & World Report were more likely to have diversity initiatives (OR 6.23, 95% CI 1.78-23.97; p = 0.007). Programs meeting any DEI criterion had a higher percentage of female (29.67% vs 22.55%, p = 0.013) and Black (7.85% vs 4.49%, p = 0.019) residents. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of White residents (p = 0.206) across programs, and programs with a mention of DEI in the mission statement had a lower percentage of Asian residents (24.08% vs 33.29%, p = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most US neurosurgery residency programs lack DEI information on their websites. Larger programs and those with higher rankings are more likely to include DEI content, particularly standalone statements. Programs meeting DEI criteria tend to have a higher representation of female and Black residents. These findings highlight the need for greater transparency and commitment to DEI in neurosurgery residency programs, ensuring prospective applicants have access to comprehensive DEI information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.JNS241585\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.JNS241585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是确定多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)信息在神经外科住院医师项目网站上的流行程度,并检查项目规模、排名和DEI信息存在之间的关系。方法:对2024年1月1日至3月2日期间115个美国神经外科住院医师项目网站进行横断面分析。网站的评估基于六个DEI标准:1)使命/领导声明中的多样性承诺,2)单独的多样性使命声明,3)为未被充分代表的少数民族学生提供轮转/奖学金,4)多样性倡议,5)多样性页面/部分,6)任命的多样性领导职位。分析了项目规模、排名和DEI信息之间的关系。结果:115个项目中,只有35个(30.43%)至少符合一项DEI标准。具体而言,18.26%的人有单独的多元化使命宣言,15.65%的人在使命/领导信息中包含DEI声明。超过13名住院医师的项目更有可能满足至少一项DEI标准(OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.16-7.56;p = 0.022),并在使命/领导信息中包含DEI声明(OR 5.38, 95% CI 1.71-24.72;P = 0.018)。《美国新闻与世界报道》排名前25位的节目更有可能采取多元化举措(OR 6.23, 95% CI 1.78-23.97;P = 0.007)。满足任何DEI标准的项目中,女性居民(29.67% vs 22.55%, p = 0.013)和黑人居民(7.85% vs 4.49%, p = 0.019)的比例较高。在不同的项目中,白人居民的比例没有统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.206),而在任务声明中提到DEI的项目中,亚裔居民的比例较低(24.08% vs 33.29%, p = 0.042)。结论:大多数美国神经外科住院医师项目在其网站上缺乏DEI信息。规模较大的课程和排名较高的课程更有可能包含DEI内容,尤其是独立语句。符合DEI标准的项目往往有更高的女性和黑人居民代表。这些发现强调了在神经外科住院医师项目中需要更大的透明度和对DEI的承诺,以确保潜在的申请人能够获得全面的DEI信息。
Evaluation of diversity, equity, and inclusion information on US neurosurgery residency program websites.
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) information on neurosurgery residency program websites and examine the association between program size, ranking, and DEI information presence.
Methods: A cross-sectional review of 115 US neurosurgery residency program websites was conducted from January 1 to March 2, 2024. Websites were evaluated based on six DEI criteria: 1) diversity commitment in mission/leadership statements, 2) separate diversity mission statement, 3) rotations/fellowships for underrepresented minority students, 4) diversity initiatives, 5) diversity page/section, and 6) appointed diversity leadership positions. Associations between program size, ranking, and DEI information were analyzed.
Results: Among the 115 programs, only 35 (30.43%) met at least one DEI criterion. Specifically, 18.26% had a separate diversity mission statement and 15.65% included a DEI statement in mission/leadership messages. Programs with more than 13 residents were significantly more likely to meet at least one DEI criterion (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.16-7.56; p = 0.022) and to include a DEI statement in mission/leadership messages (OR 5.38, 95% CI 1.71-24.72; p = 0.018). Top 25-ranked programs by U.S. News & World Report were more likely to have diversity initiatives (OR 6.23, 95% CI 1.78-23.97; p = 0.007). Programs meeting any DEI criterion had a higher percentage of female (29.67% vs 22.55%, p = 0.013) and Black (7.85% vs 4.49%, p = 0.019) residents. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of White residents (p = 0.206) across programs, and programs with a mention of DEI in the mission statement had a lower percentage of Asian residents (24.08% vs 33.29%, p = 0.042).
Conclusions: Most US neurosurgery residency programs lack DEI information on their websites. Larger programs and those with higher rankings are more likely to include DEI content, particularly standalone statements. Programs meeting DEI criteria tend to have a higher representation of female and Black residents. These findings highlight the need for greater transparency and commitment to DEI in neurosurgery residency programs, ensuring prospective applicants have access to comprehensive DEI information.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.