IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2024.0166
Amrita Chattopadhyay, Ya-Ting Wu, Han-Ching Chan, Yi-Ting Kang, Ying-Cheng Chiang, Chun-Ju Chiang, Wen-Chung Lee, Tzu-Pin Lu
{"title":"​","authors":"Amrita Chattopadhyay, Ya-Ting Wu, Han-Ching Chan, Yi-Ting Kang, Ying-Cheng Chiang, Chun-Ju Chiang, Wen-Chung Lee, Tzu-Pin Lu","doi":"10.1089/whr.2024.0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer is one of the top seven causes of cancer deaths. Incidence of ovarian cancer varies by ethnicity, where Asian women demonstrate lower incidence rates than non-Hispanic Blacks and Whites. Survival prediction models for ovarian cancer have been developed for Caucasians and Black populations using national databases; however, whether these models work for Asians is unclear. Therefore, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to develop survival prediction models for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer from a Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) who underwent de-bulking and chemotherapy, with the aim to identify variables that can predict prognosis accurately. Patients diagnosed with OC from TCR were included.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two prognostic models (M1 and M2) were developed: M1 utilized clinical variables only, M2 additionally included cancer-specific variables with the aim to improve the accuracy. All methods were repeated independently for patients with only serous ovarian cancer. All findings for model M1 were validated among Black, White, and Asian populations from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 10-fold internal cross-validations. Due to absence of cancer-specific site variables in SEER, model M2 was only internally validated. Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis was performed and a stepwise strategy with Akaike-information criterion was used to select appropriate variables as predictors to develop both M1 and M2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The c-index values of both models were >0.7 in both TCR and SEER populations for epithelial ovarian cancer. Calibration analysis demonstrated good prediction performance with the proportional difference between predicted and observed survival to be <5%. The performance was similar for the subset of patients with serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Notably, no significant racial differences were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prognostic models proposed in this study can potentially be used for identifying patients, especially from Taiwan, at higher risk of ovarian cancer mortality early on, leading to improved prognosis, through shared decision-making between physicians and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"6 1","pages":"90-101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Survival Outcomes for Patients with Ovarian Cancer Using National Cancer Registry Data from Taiwan: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Amrita Chattopadhyay, Ya-Ting Wu, Han-Ching Chan, Yi-Ting Kang, Ying-Cheng Chiang, Chun-Ju Chiang, Wen-Chung Lee, Tzu-Pin Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/whr.2024.0166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer is one of the top seven causes of cancer deaths. Incidence of ovarian cancer varies by ethnicity, where Asian women demonstrate lower incidence rates than non-Hispanic Blacks and Whites. Survival prediction models for ovarian cancer have been developed for Caucasians and Black populations using national databases; however, whether these models work for Asians is unclear. Therefore, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to develop survival prediction models for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer from a Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) who underwent de-bulking and chemotherapy, with the aim to identify variables that can predict prognosis accurately. Patients diagnosed with OC from TCR were included.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two prognostic models (M1 and M2) were developed: M1 utilized clinical variables only, M2 additionally included cancer-specific variables with the aim to improve the accuracy. All methods were repeated independently for patients with only serous ovarian cancer. All findings for model M1 were validated among Black, White, and Asian populations from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 10-fold internal cross-validations. Due to absence of cancer-specific site variables in SEER, model M2 was only internally validated. Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis was performed and a stepwise strategy with Akaike-information criterion was used to select appropriate variables as predictors to develop both M1 and M2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The c-index values of both models were >0.7 in both TCR and SEER populations for epithelial ovarian cancer. Calibration analysis demonstrated good prediction performance with the proportional difference between predicted and observed survival to be <5%. The performance was similar for the subset of patients with serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Notably, no significant racial differences were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prognostic models proposed in this study can potentially be used for identifying patients, especially from Taiwan, at higher risk of ovarian cancer mortality early on, leading to improved prognosis, through shared decision-making between physicians and patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"90-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卵巢癌是癌症死亡的七大原因之一。卵巢癌的发病率因种族而异,亚洲妇女的发病率低于非西班牙裔黑人和白人。利用国家数据库为白种人和黑人开发了卵巢癌生存预测模型;然而,这些模式是否适用于亚洲人还不清楚。因此,本研究以台湾癌症登记处(TCR)上皮性卵巢癌患者为研究对象,进行回顾性队列研究,建立生存预测模型,以确定能够准确预测预后的变量。从TCR中诊断为OC的患者被纳入研究。方法:建立两种预后模型(M1和M2): M1仅使用临床变量,M2增加肿瘤特异性变量以提高准确性。仅浆液性卵巢癌患者独立重复所有方法。M1模型的所有研究结果在黑人、白人和亚洲人群中得到验证,这些人群来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库和10次内部交叉验证。由于SEER中缺乏癌症特异性位点变量,M2模型仅在内部验证。采用cox -比例风险回归分析,采用赤池信息准则的逐步预测策略,选择合适的变量作为M1和M2的预测因子。结果:在TCR和SEER人群中,两种模型对上皮性卵巢癌的c-index值均为bb0 0.7。结论:本研究提出的预后模型可通过医患共同决策,早期识别卵巢癌高危患者,尤其是台湾地区的卵巢癌高危患者,从而改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Survival Outcomes for Patients with Ovarian Cancer Using National Cancer Registry Data from Taiwan: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Ovarian cancer is one of the top seven causes of cancer deaths. Incidence of ovarian cancer varies by ethnicity, where Asian women demonstrate lower incidence rates than non-Hispanic Blacks and Whites. Survival prediction models for ovarian cancer have been developed for Caucasians and Black populations using national databases; however, whether these models work for Asians is unclear. Therefore, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to develop survival prediction models for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer from a Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) who underwent de-bulking and chemotherapy, with the aim to identify variables that can predict prognosis accurately. Patients diagnosed with OC from TCR were included.

Method: Two prognostic models (M1 and M2) were developed: M1 utilized clinical variables only, M2 additionally included cancer-specific variables with the aim to improve the accuracy. All methods were repeated independently for patients with only serous ovarian cancer. All findings for model M1 were validated among Black, White, and Asian populations from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 10-fold internal cross-validations. Due to absence of cancer-specific site variables in SEER, model M2 was only internally validated. Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis was performed and a stepwise strategy with Akaike-information criterion was used to select appropriate variables as predictors to develop both M1 and M2.

Results: The c-index values of both models were >0.7 in both TCR and SEER populations for epithelial ovarian cancer. Calibration analysis demonstrated good prediction performance with the proportional difference between predicted and observed survival to be <5%. The performance was similar for the subset of patients with serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Notably, no significant racial differences were observed.

Conclusion: The prognostic models proposed in this study can potentially be used for identifying patients, especially from Taiwan, at higher risk of ovarian cancer mortality early on, leading to improved prognosis, through shared decision-making between physicians and patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信