流行病对学术医学研究人员的影响:一项混合方法研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-01-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2024.0091
Kimberly Bloom-Feshbach, Vasilia Vasiliou, Lance D Laird, Janet T Civian, Linda H Pololi
{"title":"流行病对学术医学研究人员的影响:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Kimberly Bloom-Feshbach, Vasilia Vasiliou, Lance D Laird, Janet T Civian, Linda H Pololi","doi":"10.1089/whr.2024.0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This mixed-method study sought to elucidate the impact of COVID-19 on the professional environments and career trajectories of midcareer research faculty in U.S. medical schools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 40 midcareer medical school faculty enrolled in the Brandeis University C-Change Mentoring and Leadership Institute, a group peer mentoring career development course being tested in a National Institutes of Health-funded randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a gender disparity in both the quantitative and qualitative data, with women faculty describing COVID-19 more negatively impacting their career trajectory. This negative impact was independent of having children in the home. Participants largely reported no change in their commitment to conducting research or interest in applying for research funding. A total of 54% of faculty reported no effect of the pandemic on their relationships with colleagues (<i>n</i> = 21) and 33% reported a negative effect (<i>n</i> = 13). A trend emerged when examining the data by degree, however, with PhD faculty about twice as likely as physicians to report a negative effect of the pandemic on their relationship with colleagues (47% <i>n</i> = 9 vs. 20% <i>n</i> = 4, respectively). The ordinal test on the 5-point scale approached statistical significance but did not meet the standard 0.05 cut-off (<i>p</i> value = 0.06; Z-value = -1.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While faculty initially reported some positive outcomes of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in their own experiences in April 2020, their experiences 1 year later reflected negative impacts of the pandemic on career trajectory, especially for women, and on relationships with colleagues, with a higher intensity signal for PhD scientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"6 1","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pandemic Impact on Research Faculty in Academic Medicine: A Mixed Method Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly Bloom-Feshbach, Vasilia Vasiliou, Lance D Laird, Janet T Civian, Linda H Pololi\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/whr.2024.0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This mixed-method study sought to elucidate the impact of COVID-19 on the professional environments and career trajectories of midcareer research faculty in U.S. medical schools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 40 midcareer medical school faculty enrolled in the Brandeis University C-Change Mentoring and Leadership Institute, a group peer mentoring career development course being tested in a National Institutes of Health-funded randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a gender disparity in both the quantitative and qualitative data, with women faculty describing COVID-19 more negatively impacting their career trajectory. This negative impact was independent of having children in the home. Participants largely reported no change in their commitment to conducting research or interest in applying for research funding. A total of 54% of faculty reported no effect of the pandemic on their relationships with colleagues (<i>n</i> = 21) and 33% reported a negative effect (<i>n</i> = 13). A trend emerged when examining the data by degree, however, with PhD faculty about twice as likely as physicians to report a negative effect of the pandemic on their relationship with colleagues (47% <i>n</i> = 9 vs. 20% <i>n</i> = 4, respectively). The ordinal test on the 5-point scale approached statistical significance but did not meet the standard 0.05 cut-off (<i>p</i> value = 0.06; Z-value = -1.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While faculty initially reported some positive outcomes of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in their own experiences in April 2020, their experiences 1 year later reflected negative impacts of the pandemic on career trajectory, especially for women, and on relationships with colleagues, with a higher intensity signal for PhD scientists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"21-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772992/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:这项混合方法研究旨在阐明 COVID-19 对美国医学院中级研究人员的职业环境和职业轨迹的影响:这项混合方法研究旨在阐明 COVID-19 对美国医学院中级研究人员的职业环境和职业发展轨迹的影响:方法:参与者为 40 名参加布兰迪斯大学 C-Change 指导与领导力学院的中年医学院教师,该学院是一个由美国国立卫生研究院资助的随机对照试验项目,目前正在对该项目进行测试:我们在定量和定性数据中观察到了性别差异,女性教职员工认为 COVID-19 对其职业发展轨迹的负面影响更大。这种负面影响与家中是否有子女无关。大部分参与者表示,他们对开展研究的承诺或申请研究基金的兴趣没有改变。共有 54% 的教职员工表示大流行病对他们与同事的关系没有影响(n = 21),33% 的教职员工表示有负面影响(n = 13)。然而,在按学位审查数据时,出现了一种趋势,即博士教师报告大流行病对其与同事关系产生负面影响的可能性是医生的两倍(分别为 47% n = 9 对 20% n = 4)。5点量表的序数检验接近统计学意义,但未达到0.05的标准临界值(P值=0.06;Z值=-1.86):虽然教师们在 2020 年 4 月的亲身经历中最初报告了 SARS-CoV-2 大流行带来的一些积极结果,但一年后他们的亲身经历反映出大流行对职业发展(尤其是女性)和同事关系的负面影响,其中博士科学家受到的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pandemic Impact on Research Faculty in Academic Medicine: A Mixed Method Study.

Introduction: This mixed-method study sought to elucidate the impact of COVID-19 on the professional environments and career trajectories of midcareer research faculty in U.S. medical schools.

Methods: Participants were 40 midcareer medical school faculty enrolled in the Brandeis University C-Change Mentoring and Leadership Institute, a group peer mentoring career development course being tested in a National Institutes of Health-funded randomized controlled trial.

Results: We observed a gender disparity in both the quantitative and qualitative data, with women faculty describing COVID-19 more negatively impacting their career trajectory. This negative impact was independent of having children in the home. Participants largely reported no change in their commitment to conducting research or interest in applying for research funding. A total of 54% of faculty reported no effect of the pandemic on their relationships with colleagues (n = 21) and 33% reported a negative effect (n = 13). A trend emerged when examining the data by degree, however, with PhD faculty about twice as likely as physicians to report a negative effect of the pandemic on their relationship with colleagues (47% n = 9 vs. 20% n = 4, respectively). The ordinal test on the 5-point scale approached statistical significance but did not meet the standard 0.05 cut-off (p value = 0.06; Z-value = -1.86).

Conclusions: While faculty initially reported some positive outcomes of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in their own experiences in April 2020, their experiences 1 year later reflected negative impacts of the pandemic on career trajectory, especially for women, and on relationships with colleagues, with a higher intensity signal for PhD scientists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信