Davut D Uzun, Johannes Schäfer, Sascha Klemm, Christoph Lichtenstern, Markus A Weigand, Christopher Neuhaus
{"title":"[User behavior during functional testing of the ventilator: analysis of the use of the QUICKcheck and detection of misconnected ventilation tubes].","authors":"Davut D Uzun, Johannes Schäfer, Sascha Klemm, Christoph Lichtenstern, Markus A Weigand, Christopher Neuhaus","doi":"10.1007/s00101-024-01496-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and research question: </strong>While patient safety during general anesthesia has improved in recent years, incidents still occur in anesthesia, particularly in the area of airway management and ventilation. In addition to a mandatory daily system test before using a ventilator, a QUICK check is recommended by the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) before connecting a patient; however, misconnections of breathing tubes are still possible and not necessarily detected by the device self-test. The aim of the present study was to analyze user behavior at modern anesthesia workstations regarding the verification and functionality of the QUICK check.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A monocentric prospective recording of user behavior in handling the QUICKcheck was carried out as part of a medical simulation training course as well as a prospective, multicenter, explorative, anonymous survey of anesthesiology staff in various German hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 30 participating physicians 93.3% (n = 28) carried out a QUICK check immediately before connecting the simulation patient to the ventilator. Only 1 (96.6%) of the physicians did not recognize the incorrect connection of the ventilation tubes during their QUICK check. Of the participating physicians, 80% did not use the separate bag valve mask despite persistent ventilation problems on the ventilator. The online survey was answered by n = 187 participants, 64.7% of the participants stated that they always carry out the QUICK check, 31.5% sometimes and 3.7% never. The presence of a separate bag valve mask is always checked by 66.3% of respondents, by 29.8% sometimes and by 3.8% never. Of the physicians, 32% believed that the integrated self-test always recognizes a misconnection of the ventilation tubes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study reveals a heterogeneous picture of the application and understanding of the QUICK check as recommended by the DGAI. The lack of understanding of a standardized implementation of the check can be seen as further evidence of the importance of interdisciplinary training with a focus on human factors, communication and cooperation as opposed to a mere procedural implementation of established tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01496-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究问题:尽管近年来全身麻醉期间的患者安全状况有所改善,但麻醉事故仍时有发生,尤其是在气道管理和通气方面。除了每天使用呼吸机前必须进行系统测试外,德国麻醉学和重症监护医学会(DGAI)还建议在连接病人前进行 QUICK 检查;然而,呼吸管道的错误连接仍有可能发生,而且不一定能通过设备自检检测出来。本研究旨在分析现代麻醉工作站用户对 QUICK 检查的验证和功能的使用行为:作为医疗模拟培训课程的一部分,对用户操作 QUICK 检查的行为进行了单中心前瞻性记录,并对德国多家医院的麻醉科工作人员进行了前瞻性、多中心、探索性和匿名调查:在 30 名参与调查的医生中,93.3%(28 人)在为模拟病人连接呼吸机前立即进行了 QUICK 检查。只有 1 名医生(96.6%)在进行 QUICK 检查时没有识别出通气管的错误连接。在参与调查的医生中,有 80% 的医生在呼吸机出现持续通气问题时仍未使用单独的袋阀面罩。参与在线调查的人数为 187 人,其中 64.7% 的人表示他们经常进行 QUICK 检查,31.5% 的人表示有时进行,3.7% 的人表示从不进行。66.3%的受访者经常检查是否有独立的袋阀面罩,29.8%的受访者有时检查,3.8%的受访者从不检查。在医生中,32% 的人认为综合自检始终能识别通气管连接错误:本研究显示,对 DGAI 推荐的 QUICK 检查的应用和理解存在差异。对检查的标准化实施缺乏了解,这进一步证明了跨学科培训的重要性,培训的重点是人为因素、沟通与合作,而不仅仅是既定工具的程序实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[User behavior during functional testing of the ventilator: analysis of the use of the QUICKcheck and detection of misconnected ventilation tubes].

Background and research question: While patient safety during general anesthesia has improved in recent years, incidents still occur in anesthesia, particularly in the area of airway management and ventilation. In addition to a mandatory daily system test before using a ventilator, a QUICK check is recommended by the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) before connecting a patient; however, misconnections of breathing tubes are still possible and not necessarily detected by the device self-test. The aim of the present study was to analyze user behavior at modern anesthesia workstations regarding the verification and functionality of the QUICK check.

Material and methods: A monocentric prospective recording of user behavior in handling the QUICKcheck was carried out as part of a medical simulation training course as well as a prospective, multicenter, explorative, anonymous survey of anesthesiology staff in various German hospitals.

Results: Out of 30 participating physicians 93.3% (n = 28) carried out a QUICK check immediately before connecting the simulation patient to the ventilator. Only 1 (96.6%) of the physicians did not recognize the incorrect connection of the ventilation tubes during their QUICK check. Of the participating physicians, 80% did not use the separate bag valve mask despite persistent ventilation problems on the ventilator. The online survey was answered by n = 187 participants, 64.7% of the participants stated that they always carry out the QUICK check, 31.5% sometimes and 3.7% never. The presence of a separate bag valve mask is always checked by 66.3% of respondents, by 29.8% sometimes and by 3.8% never. Of the physicians, 32% believed that the integrated self-test always recognizes a misconnection of the ventilation tubes.

Conclusion: The present study reveals a heterogeneous picture of the application and understanding of the QUICK check as recommended by the DGAI. The lack of understanding of a standardized implementation of the check can be seen as further evidence of the importance of interdisciplinary training with a focus on human factors, communication and cooperation as opposed to a mere procedural implementation of established tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信