印度老年癌症患者在临床试验中的代表性不足。

BMJ oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000445
Vanita Noronha, Vijay Patil, Nandini Menon, Manali Kolkur, Zoya Peelay, Minit Shah, Vijayalakshmi Mathrudev, Srushti Shah, Kavita Nawale, Nita S Nair, Anant Ramaswamy, Vikas Ostwal, Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Pankaj Chaturvedi, Supriya Chopra, Vedang Murthy, Sheila N Myatra, Jigeeshu Divatia, Vikram Gota, Sudeep Gupta, Vikram Chaudhari, Sabita Jiwnani, Shailesh V Shrikhande, Richa Vaish, Devendra Chaukar, Shivakumar Thiagarajan, Sudhir Nair, Anil D'Cruz, Amey Oak, Rohini Hawaladar, Oindrila Roy Chowdhury, Shripad Banavali, Rajendra Badwe, Kumar Prabhash
{"title":"印度老年癌症患者在临床试验中的代表性不足。","authors":"Vanita Noronha, Vijay Patil, Nandini Menon, Manali Kolkur, Zoya Peelay, Minit Shah, Vijayalakshmi Mathrudev, Srushti Shah, Kavita Nawale, Nita S Nair, Anant Ramaswamy, Vikas Ostwal, Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Pankaj Chaturvedi, Supriya Chopra, Vedang Murthy, Sheila N Myatra, Jigeeshu Divatia, Vikram Gota, Sudeep Gupta, Vikram Chaudhari, Sabita Jiwnani, Shailesh V Shrikhande, Richa Vaish, Devendra Chaukar, Shivakumar Thiagarajan, Sudhir Nair, Anil D'Cruz, Amey Oak, Rohini Hawaladar, Oindrila Roy Chowdhury, Shripad Banavali, Rajendra Badwe, Kumar Prabhash","doi":"10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Older patients with cancer have traditionally been under-represented in global clinical trials. There are no data from India regarding this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis done at our institute on interventional studies conducted between 2003 and 2023 in adult patients with malignancies. We excluded studies done exclusively in the paediatric population and observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 21 894 patients enrolled in 150 interventional trials from the departments of surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, anaesthesia, and clinical pharmacology; 110 (73.3%) were investigator initiated. There were 38 trials (25.3%) in breast cancer (6141 patients, 28%), and 33 (22%) in head and neck cancer (6975 patients, 31.9%). Studies were predominantly phase III (97 trials (64.7%)). Multicentric studies comprised approximately one-third (48, 32%). The median age of enrolled patients was 51 years (IQR 43-59). There were 5132 (23.4%) participants aged ≥60 years, 2678 (12.2%) ≥65 years and 1045 (4.8%) ≥70 years. Data from the hospital registry revealed that 30% of adult registrations were ≥60 years. There was a significant increase in the proportion of older patients enrolled in clinical trials from 2003 (8%) to 2019 (22%) compared with their proportion in the hospital registry (stable at 28%-29%); p<0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a gap between the proportion of older Indian adults with cancer in the hospital registry and those enrolled in interventional clinical trials, however, this gap has shrunk over time. Various factors that limit the recruitment of this vulnerable cohort like age-specific eligibility criteria are immediately actionable to make clinical trials more inclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":72436,"journal":{"name":"BMJ oncology","volume":"3 1","pages":"e000445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Under-representation of older Indian persons with cancer in clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Vanita Noronha, Vijay Patil, Nandini Menon, Manali Kolkur, Zoya Peelay, Minit Shah, Vijayalakshmi Mathrudev, Srushti Shah, Kavita Nawale, Nita S Nair, Anant Ramaswamy, Vikas Ostwal, Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Pankaj Chaturvedi, Supriya Chopra, Vedang Murthy, Sheila N Myatra, Jigeeshu Divatia, Vikram Gota, Sudeep Gupta, Vikram Chaudhari, Sabita Jiwnani, Shailesh V Shrikhande, Richa Vaish, Devendra Chaukar, Shivakumar Thiagarajan, Sudhir Nair, Anil D'Cruz, Amey Oak, Rohini Hawaladar, Oindrila Roy Chowdhury, Shripad Banavali, Rajendra Badwe, Kumar Prabhash\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Older patients with cancer have traditionally been under-represented in global clinical trials. There are no data from India regarding this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis done at our institute on interventional studies conducted between 2003 and 2023 in adult patients with malignancies. We excluded studies done exclusively in the paediatric population and observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 21 894 patients enrolled in 150 interventional trials from the departments of surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, anaesthesia, and clinical pharmacology; 110 (73.3%) were investigator initiated. There were 38 trials (25.3%) in breast cancer (6141 patients, 28%), and 33 (22%) in head and neck cancer (6975 patients, 31.9%). Studies were predominantly phase III (97 trials (64.7%)). Multicentric studies comprised approximately one-third (48, 32%). The median age of enrolled patients was 51 years (IQR 43-59). There were 5132 (23.4%) participants aged ≥60 years, 2678 (12.2%) ≥65 years and 1045 (4.8%) ≥70 years. Data from the hospital registry revealed that 30% of adult registrations were ≥60 years. There was a significant increase in the proportion of older patients enrolled in clinical trials from 2003 (8%) to 2019 (22%) compared with their proportion in the hospital registry (stable at 28%-29%); p<0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a gap between the proportion of older Indian adults with cancer in the hospital registry and those enrolled in interventional clinical trials, however, this gap has shrunk over time. Various factors that limit the recruitment of this vulnerable cohort like age-specific eligibility criteria are immediately actionable to make clinical trials more inclusive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ oncology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"e000445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:老年癌症患者历来在全球临床试验中代表性不足。印度没有关于这个问题的数据。方法和分析:这是一项回顾性分析,在我们研究所对2003年至2023年在成年恶性肿瘤患者中进行的介入研究进行了分析。我们排除了仅在儿科人群中进行的研究和观察性研究。结果:我们纳入了来自外科、内科、放射肿瘤科、麻醉科和临床药理学的150项介入试验中的21894名患者;110例(73.3%)由调查人员发起。乳腺癌有38项(25.3%)试验(6141例,28%),头颈癌有33项(22%)试验(6975例,31.9%)。研究主要是III期(97项试验(64.7%))。多中心研究约占三分之一(48.32%)。入组患者的中位年龄为51岁(IQR 43-59)。年龄≥60岁5132例(23.4%),≥65岁2678例(12.2%),≥70岁1045例(4.8%)。来自医院登记的数据显示,30%的成人登记年龄≥60岁。从2003年(8%)到2019年(22%),与医院登记的老年患者比例(稳定在28%-29%)相比,参加临床试验的老年患者比例显著增加;结论:在医院登记的印度老年癌症患者比例与参加介入性临床试验的比例之间存在差距,然而,这一差距随着时间的推移而缩小。限制招募这一弱势群体的各种因素,如特定年龄的资格标准,可以立即采取行动,使临床试验更具包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Under-representation of older Indian persons with cancer in clinical trials.

Under-representation of older Indian persons with cancer in clinical trials.

Under-representation of older Indian persons with cancer in clinical trials.

Under-representation of older Indian persons with cancer in clinical trials.

Objective: Older patients with cancer have traditionally been under-represented in global clinical trials. There are no data from India regarding this issue.

Methods and analysis: This was a retrospective analysis done at our institute on interventional studies conducted between 2003 and 2023 in adult patients with malignancies. We excluded studies done exclusively in the paediatric population and observational studies.

Results: We included 21 894 patients enrolled in 150 interventional trials from the departments of surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, anaesthesia, and clinical pharmacology; 110 (73.3%) were investigator initiated. There were 38 trials (25.3%) in breast cancer (6141 patients, 28%), and 33 (22%) in head and neck cancer (6975 patients, 31.9%). Studies were predominantly phase III (97 trials (64.7%)). Multicentric studies comprised approximately one-third (48, 32%). The median age of enrolled patients was 51 years (IQR 43-59). There were 5132 (23.4%) participants aged ≥60 years, 2678 (12.2%) ≥65 years and 1045 (4.8%) ≥70 years. Data from the hospital registry revealed that 30% of adult registrations were ≥60 years. There was a significant increase in the proportion of older patients enrolled in clinical trials from 2003 (8%) to 2019 (22%) compared with their proportion in the hospital registry (stable at 28%-29%); p<0.001.

Conclusion: There is a gap between the proportion of older Indian adults with cancer in the hospital registry and those enrolled in interventional clinical trials, however, this gap has shrunk over time. Various factors that limit the recruitment of this vulnerable cohort like age-specific eligibility criteria are immediately actionable to make clinical trials more inclusive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信