系统性硬化症患者结晶二氧化硅工作暴露矩阵(JEM)效度。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
M Touchard, A Bourgeois, B Thoreau, M Fadel, B Zavarsky, E Diot, A Lescoat, G Le Roux, A Descatha
{"title":"系统性硬化症患者结晶二氧化硅工作暴露矩阵(JEM)效度。","authors":"M Touchard, A Bourgeois, B Thoreau, M Fadel, B Zavarsky, E Diot, A Lescoat, G Le Roux, A Descatha","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the connective tissue disease with the highest individual mortality. Crystalline silica is known to be an occupational risk factor for SSc. To assess past crystalline silica exposure, we aimed to study the validity of a job exposure matrix (JEM) to assess occupational exposure to crystalline silica compared to specific occupational interviews in two populations of SSc patients.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To demonstrate the reliability of JEM for the assessment of occupational exposure to hazards such as silica, in severe rare disorders like SSc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from two university hospital centres underwent standardized assessment of occupational silica exposure and collected job histories through face-to-face interviews. A JEM from the French program Matgéné was used to assess silica exposure and compared to the standardized interview results. Standard metrics were computed for evaluate the accuracy of JEM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>67 participants from Rennes, and 119 from Tours were included, with respectively 10.5% and 18.0% of patients with silica exposure based on the results of the interview. The JEM with 50% probability cut-off had a good performance when compared with the classic assessment method. A cumulative exposure index from JEM over 250 had an area under the curve between 0.76 and 0.79 and also a very high positive likelihood ratio (17.14 and 10.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite limitations inherent to JEMs and associated validation methods, the JEM used in this setting provided accurate results to assess occupational exposure to crystalline silica for clinical purposes such as in SSc patients, especially to detect positive cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":54696,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Medicine-Oxford","volume":" ","pages":"65-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Job-exposure matrix (JEM) validity on crystalline silica among systemic sclerosis patients.\",\"authors\":\"M Touchard, A Bourgeois, B Thoreau, M Fadel, B Zavarsky, E Diot, A Lescoat, G Le Roux, A Descatha\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqae133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the connective tissue disease with the highest individual mortality. Crystalline silica is known to be an occupational risk factor for SSc. To assess past crystalline silica exposure, we aimed to study the validity of a job exposure matrix (JEM) to assess occupational exposure to crystalline silica compared to specific occupational interviews in two populations of SSc patients.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To demonstrate the reliability of JEM for the assessment of occupational exposure to hazards such as silica, in severe rare disorders like SSc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from two university hospital centres underwent standardized assessment of occupational silica exposure and collected job histories through face-to-face interviews. A JEM from the French program Matgéné was used to assess silica exposure and compared to the standardized interview results. Standard metrics were computed for evaluate the accuracy of JEM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>67 participants from Rennes, and 119 from Tours were included, with respectively 10.5% and 18.0% of patients with silica exposure based on the results of the interview. The JEM with 50% probability cut-off had a good performance when compared with the classic assessment method. A cumulative exposure index from JEM over 250 had an area under the curve between 0.76 and 0.79 and also a very high positive likelihood ratio (17.14 and 10.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite limitations inherent to JEMs and associated validation methods, the JEM used in this setting provided accurate results to assess occupational exposure to crystalline silica for clinical purposes such as in SSc patients, especially to detect positive cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational Medicine-Oxford\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"65-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational Medicine-Oxford\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Medicine-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:系统性硬化症(SSc)是个体死亡率最高的结缔组织疾病。众所周知,结晶二氧化硅是SSc的职业风险因素。为了评估过去的结晶二氧化硅暴露,我们旨在研究工作暴露矩阵(JEM)的有效性,以评估两个SSc患者群体中结晶二氧化硅的职业暴露,并将其与特定职业访谈进行比较。目的:证明JEM在严重罕见疾病(如SSc)中评估职业暴露于危害(如二氧化硅)的可靠性。方法:来自两所大学医院中心的患者进行了职业二氧化硅暴露的标准化评估,并通过面对面访谈收集了工作经历。来自法国项目matg的JEM被用来评估二氧化硅暴露,并与标准化访谈结果进行比较。计算了评价JEM准确性的标准指标。结果:包括来自雷恩的67名参与者和来自图尔的119名参与者,根据访谈结果,分别有10.5%和18.0%的患者暴露于二氧化硅。与经典评价方法相比,具有50%截断概率的JEM具有较好的评价效果。250以上的JEM累积暴露指数曲线下面积在0.76 ~ 0.79之间,阳性似然比非常高(17.14 ~ 10.29)。结论:尽管JEM和相关验证方法存在固有的局限性,但在这种情况下使用的JEM提供了准确的结果,以评估临床目的(如SSc患者)对结晶二氧化硅的职业暴露,特别是检测阳性病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Job-exposure matrix (JEM) validity on crystalline silica among systemic sclerosis patients.

Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the connective tissue disease with the highest individual mortality. Crystalline silica is known to be an occupational risk factor for SSc. To assess past crystalline silica exposure, we aimed to study the validity of a job exposure matrix (JEM) to assess occupational exposure to crystalline silica compared to specific occupational interviews in two populations of SSc patients.

Aims: To demonstrate the reliability of JEM for the assessment of occupational exposure to hazards such as silica, in severe rare disorders like SSc.

Methods: Patients from two university hospital centres underwent standardized assessment of occupational silica exposure and collected job histories through face-to-face interviews. A JEM from the French program Matgéné was used to assess silica exposure and compared to the standardized interview results. Standard metrics were computed for evaluate the accuracy of JEM.

Results: 67 participants from Rennes, and 119 from Tours were included, with respectively 10.5% and 18.0% of patients with silica exposure based on the results of the interview. The JEM with 50% probability cut-off had a good performance when compared with the classic assessment method. A cumulative exposure index from JEM over 250 had an area under the curve between 0.76 and 0.79 and also a very high positive likelihood ratio (17.14 and 10.29).

Conclusions: Despite limitations inherent to JEMs and associated validation methods, the JEM used in this setting provided accurate results to assess occupational exposure to crystalline silica for clinical purposes such as in SSc patients, especially to detect positive cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Occupational Medicine-Oxford
Occupational Medicine-Oxford 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.90%
发文量
120
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Occupational Medicine is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides vital information for the promotion of workplace health and safety. The key strategic aims of the journal are to improve the practice of occupational health professionals through continuing education and to raise the profile of occupational health with key stakeholders including policy makers and representatives of employers and employees. Topics covered include work-related injury and illness, accident and illness prevention, health promotion, occupational disease, health education, the establishment and implementation of health and safety standards, monitoring of the work environment, and the management of recognized hazards. Contributions are welcomed from practising occupational health professionals and research workers in related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信