IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Laith Alhuneafat, Fares Ghanem, Ahmad Jabri, Abdallah Naser, Muhammed Ibraiz Bilal, Mohannad Al Akeel, Andrea Elliott, Tamas Alexy, Mohammad Alqarqaz, Pedro Villablanca, Mir Babar Basir
{"title":"Temporary mechanical circulatory support utilization and outcomes in cardiogenic shock phenotypes: A comparative analysis of heart failure and acute myocardial infarction.","authors":"Laith Alhuneafat, Fares Ghanem, Ahmad Jabri, Abdallah Naser, Muhammed Ibraiz Bilal, Mohannad Al Akeel, Andrea Elliott, Tamas Alexy, Mohammad Alqarqaz, Pedro Villablanca, Mir Babar Basir","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is marked by substantial morbidity and mortality. The two major CS etiologies include heart failure (HF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The utilization trends of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and their clinical outcomes are not well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compares the rates of MCS utilization, factors associated with utilization, and clinical outcomes in patients who present with HF-CS and AMI-CS, using 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 329,280 patients, comprising 204,660 cases of AMI-CS and 124,620 of HF-CS. MCS utilization increased over the study period with variable degree among devices, and CS-phenotype. AMI-CS had higher intraaortic balloon pump (32.4 % vs. 8.9 %), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (2.8 % vs. 2.4 %), and percutaneous ventricular assist device use (14.5 % vs. 8.1 %) compared to HF-CS (p < 0.01). Factors linked to lower MCS use were female sex, age over 60 years, Black race, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive lung disease, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, previous stroke, or myocardial infarction. After adjusting for various factors, patients with HF-CS vs. AMI-CS had significantly fewer adverse outcomes, including inpatient death, stroke, tracheostomy, mechanical ventilation, and blood transfusion. However, HF-CS had higher odds of acute renal failure requiring dialysis. AMI-CS was associated with shorter hospital stays (8.8 vs. 15.0 days, p < 0.001), lower charges ($251,580 vs. $294,792, p < 0.001), and were less likely to discharge home.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the evolving trends in MCS utilization over time, CS patients still face high morbidity and mortality rates. The underlying shock etiology has a substantial impact on outcomes, with AMI cases demonstrating worse complications. This highlights the need for a standardized approach that also takes into consideration etiology, patient-specific factors, care availability, and equitable access.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.01.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:心源性休克(CS)的发病率和死亡率都很高。心源性休克的两大病因包括心力衰竭(HF)和急性心肌梗死(AMI)。机械循环支持(MCS)的使用趋势及其临床结果尚未得到很好的描述:本研究使用 2016-2020 年全国住院病人抽样数据,比较了高血压-CS 和急性心肌梗死-CS 患者的机械循环支持使用率、使用相关因素和临床结果:研究共纳入 329280 名患者,其中包括 204660 例 AMI-CS 和 124620 例 HF-CS。在研究期间,MCS 的使用率有所增加,但不同设备和 CS 表型的使用率各不相同。与 HF-CS 相比,AMI-CS 使用主动脉内球囊泵(32.4% 对 8.9%)、体外膜肺氧合(2.8% 对 2.4%)和经皮心室辅助装置(14.5% 对 8.1%)的比例更高(p 结论:AMI-CS 和 HF-CS 的 MCS 使用率均高于 AMI-CS:尽管随着时间的推移,MCS 的使用呈现出不断变化的趋势,但 CS 患者仍面临着较高的发病率和死亡率。潜在的休克病因对预后有很大影响,急性心肌梗死病例的并发症更严重。这凸显了标准化方法的必要性,同时也要考虑到病因、患者特异性因素、护理可用性和公平获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporary mechanical circulatory support utilization and outcomes in cardiogenic shock phenotypes: A comparative analysis of heart failure and acute myocardial infarction.

Introduction: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is marked by substantial morbidity and mortality. The two major CS etiologies include heart failure (HF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The utilization trends of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and their clinical outcomes are not well described.

Methods: This study compares the rates of MCS utilization, factors associated with utilization, and clinical outcomes in patients who present with HF-CS and AMI-CS, using 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample data.

Results: The study included 329,280 patients, comprising 204,660 cases of AMI-CS and 124,620 of HF-CS. MCS utilization increased over the study period with variable degree among devices, and CS-phenotype. AMI-CS had higher intraaortic balloon pump (32.4 % vs. 8.9 %), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (2.8 % vs. 2.4 %), and percutaneous ventricular assist device use (14.5 % vs. 8.1 %) compared to HF-CS (p < 0.01). Factors linked to lower MCS use were female sex, age over 60 years, Black race, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive lung disease, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, previous stroke, or myocardial infarction. After adjusting for various factors, patients with HF-CS vs. AMI-CS had significantly fewer adverse outcomes, including inpatient death, stroke, tracheostomy, mechanical ventilation, and blood transfusion. However, HF-CS had higher odds of acute renal failure requiring dialysis. AMI-CS was associated with shorter hospital stays (8.8 vs. 15.0 days, p < 0.001), lower charges ($251,580 vs. $294,792, p < 0.001), and were less likely to discharge home.

Conclusion: Despite the evolving trends in MCS utilization over time, CS patients still face high morbidity and mortality rates. The underlying shock etiology has a substantial impact on outcomes, with AMI cases demonstrating worse complications. This highlights the need for a standardized approach that also takes into consideration etiology, patient-specific factors, care availability, and equitable access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信