测量残疾儿童兄弟姐妹的适应情况:不同翻译、不同年龄组和不同信息提供者的心理测量特性。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Linda K M Veerman, Stian Orm, Krister W Fjermestad, Torun M Vatne, Yngvild B Haukeland, Paula S Sterkenburg, Agnes M Willemen
{"title":"测量残疾儿童兄弟姐妹的适应情况:不同翻译、不同年龄组和不同信息提供者的心理测量特性。","authors":"Linda K M Veerman, Stian Orm, Krister W Fjermestad, Torun M Vatne, Yngvild B Haukeland, Paula S Sterkenburg, Agnes M Willemen","doi":"10.1080/20473869.2024.2411511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Negative Adjustment Scale (NAS) is used to measure adjustment to having a sibling with a disability. However, several adaptations to the scale have been made, and implementation varies across studies and countries. This study examined the psychometric properties across different versions and provides directions for future use and development of the NAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample comprised 400 siblings aged 6-16 years old from Norway, the Netherlands and Belgium. Measurement invariance was assessed across age groups (8-11 vs. 12-16 years) and translations (Norwegian vs. Dutch), using a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. The psychometric properties of the parent version were assessed among 102 parents from the Dutch sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistency of the NAS was acceptable to good in all versions. A single factor model held across age groups and translations, although higher order invariance was not supported. The child and parent report versions of the NAS did not significantly correlate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NAS generally has sufficient psychometric properties. However, these vary across age groups, translations, and informants, causing the NAS to be less appropriate for comparisons between groups. Further adaptation of the NAS or developing a new scale for siblings of children with disabilities, is advised.</p>","PeriodicalId":45338,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Developmental Disabilities","volume":"71 1","pages":"4-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring adjustment of siblings of children with disabilities: psychometric properties across translations, age groups and informants.\",\"authors\":\"Linda K M Veerman, Stian Orm, Krister W Fjermestad, Torun M Vatne, Yngvild B Haukeland, Paula S Sterkenburg, Agnes M Willemen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20473869.2024.2411511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Negative Adjustment Scale (NAS) is used to measure adjustment to having a sibling with a disability. However, several adaptations to the scale have been made, and implementation varies across studies and countries. This study examined the psychometric properties across different versions and provides directions for future use and development of the NAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample comprised 400 siblings aged 6-16 years old from Norway, the Netherlands and Belgium. Measurement invariance was assessed across age groups (8-11 vs. 12-16 years) and translations (Norwegian vs. Dutch), using a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. The psychometric properties of the parent version were assessed among 102 parents from the Dutch sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistency of the NAS was acceptable to good in all versions. A single factor model held across age groups and translations, although higher order invariance was not supported. The child and parent report versions of the NAS did not significantly correlate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NAS generally has sufficient psychometric properties. However, these vary across age groups, translations, and informants, causing the NAS to be less appropriate for comparisons between groups. Further adaptation of the NAS or developing a new scale for siblings of children with disabilities, is advised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"4-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2024.2411511\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2024.2411511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用负性适应量表(NAS)来衡量对有残疾兄弟姐妹的适应程度。然而,对该比额表进行了一些调整,不同研究和国家的执行情况各不相同。本研究考察了不同版本的NAS的心理测量特性,并为未来NAS的使用和发展提供了方向。方法:样本包括来自挪威、荷兰和比利时的400名6-16岁的兄弟姐妹。采用多组验证性因子分析,评估了不同年龄组(8-11岁vs. 12-16岁)和不同语种(挪威语vs.荷兰语)的测量不变性。父母版本的心理测量特性在来自荷兰样本的102名父母中进行了评估。结果:各版本NAS的内部一致性均为可接受至良好。单因素模型适用于不同年龄组和译本,但不支持高阶不变性。孩子和父母报告的NAS版本没有显著相关。结论:NAS总体上具有足够的心理测量性质。然而,这些指标因年龄组、翻译和信息提供者而异,导致NAS不太适合用于组间比较。建议进一步调整NAS或为残疾儿童的兄弟姐妹制定新的量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring adjustment of siblings of children with disabilities: psychometric properties across translations, age groups and informants.

Objectives: The Negative Adjustment Scale (NAS) is used to measure adjustment to having a sibling with a disability. However, several adaptations to the scale have been made, and implementation varies across studies and countries. This study examined the psychometric properties across different versions and provides directions for future use and development of the NAS.

Methods: The sample comprised 400 siblings aged 6-16 years old from Norway, the Netherlands and Belgium. Measurement invariance was assessed across age groups (8-11 vs. 12-16 years) and translations (Norwegian vs. Dutch), using a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. The psychometric properties of the parent version were assessed among 102 parents from the Dutch sample.

Results: The internal consistency of the NAS was acceptable to good in all versions. A single factor model held across age groups and translations, although higher order invariance was not supported. The child and parent report versions of the NAS did not significantly correlate.

Conclusions: The NAS generally has sufficient psychometric properties. However, these vary across age groups, translations, and informants, causing the NAS to be less appropriate for comparisons between groups. Further adaptation of the NAS or developing a new scale for siblings of children with disabilities, is advised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The IJDD publishes scientific articles on work dealing with different approaches to the habilitation problems of people with an intellectual disability. The Journal covers the entire spectrum of intellectual disabilities, and is concerned with definitions, IQ, genetic predisposition, evaluation of abilities, learning interventions, challenging behaviour, medication, attitudes to death and bereavement, sexuality, legal aspects, WHO, NICE and other governmental guidelines, care in the community, advocacy, stress and coping strategies for families and carers - though this is not an exhaustive list. The unifying theme is that all of these aspects should be of practical help for those with intellectual disabilities or those caring for persons with intellectual disabilities. Emphasis is placed on the practical implications of the work of educationists, instructors, nurses, occupational and other therapists, psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers, whether taking place in a hospital setting or in community care. The Journal accepts contributions from anywhere in the world but they must be written in acceptable and fluent English, avoiding technical jargon as far as possible in view of the wide readership. The IJDD puts much emphasis on the practical application of scientific findings, and prospective contributors should keep in mind that acceptance of a manuscript for publication will depend to a great extent on its direct relevance to habilitation work. Readers of the IJDD expect that articles should give them some scientific help and insight in their practical work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信