血管生成因子单独或联合超声多普勒标准对伴或不伴先兆子痫的晚发型小胎儿的危险分级

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1002/uog.29181
L Youssef, F Crispi, S Paolucci, J Miranda, S Lobmaier, F Crovetto, F Figueras, E Gratacos
{"title":"血管生成因子单独或联合超声多普勒标准对伴或不伴先兆子痫的晚发型小胎儿的危险分级","authors":"L Youssef, F Crispi, S Paolucci, J Miranda, S Lobmaier, F Crovetto, F Figueras, E Gratacos","doi":"10.1002/uog.29181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the prognostic value of maternal angiogenic factors in late-onset small fetuses, alone or in combination with the ultrasound and Doppler parameters currently used for the classification of low-risk small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses or high-risk fetal growth restriction (FGR), overall and according to the presence or absence of pre-eclampsia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study of women with a singleton pregnancy with a diagnosis of late-onset fetal smallness (defined as birth weight < 10<sup>th</sup> centile) and a gestational age of ≥ 34 weeks at delivery. Ultrasound assessment of estimated fetal weight (EFW) and Doppler assessment of uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) were performed every 1-2 weeks. Biochemical analysis of the angiogenic factors placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) in maternal peripheral venous blood samples was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay within 1-2 weeks after diagnosis of SGA or FGR. The primary outcome was adverse perinatal outcome, defined as a composite of emergency Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status, metabolic acidosis (umbilical artery pH < 7.0), neonatal unit admission and/or perinatal death. The predictive value of EFW < 3<sup>rd</sup> centile, Doppler parameters (UtA-PI > 95<sup>th</sup> centile and CPR < 5<sup>th</sup> centile) and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95<sup>th</sup> centile, alone or in combination, was assessed using logistic regression analysis in the overall population and stratified by presence or absence of pre-eclampsia developing at any time before delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 602 included cases, 91 (15.1%) developed pre-eclampsia and 511 (84.9%) did not. In the overall study population, all parameters were associated independently with adverse perinatal outcome: EFW < 3<sup>rd</sup> centile (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.58 (95% CI, 1.67-4.00)), UtA-PI > 95<sup>th</sup> centile (aOR, 1.92 (95% CI, 1.25-2.94)), CPR < 5<sup>th</sup> centile (aOR, 2.35 (95% CI, 1.46-3.78)) and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95<sup>th</sup> centile (aOR, 1.71 (95% CI, 1.09-2.69)). Only sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95<sup>th</sup> centile was associated independently with adverse perinatal outcome in cases with pre-eclampsia, whereas in those without pre-eclampsia, only EFW < 3<sup>rd</sup> centile and CPR < 5<sup>th</sup> centile were associated independently with adverse perinatal outcome. In the overall population, the detection rate (DR) and false-positive rate for adverse perinatal outcome were, respectively: 39.8% (95% CI, 31.7-47.9%) and 16.9% (95% CI, 10.7-23.1%) for sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95<sup>th</sup> centile alone; 86.8% (95% CI, 83.4-90.2%) and 61.9% (95% CI, 57.1-66.7%) for a combined model of EFW < 3<sup>rd</sup> centile, UtA-PI > 95<sup>th</sup> centile and CPR < 5<sup>th</sup> centile; 81.3% (95% CI, 77.3-85.3%) and 52.3% (95% CI, 47.1-57.5%) for a combined model of EFW < 3<sup>rd</sup> centile and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95<sup>th</sup> centile; and 88.5% (95% CI, 85.4-91.6%) and 64.5% (95% CI, 59.8-69.2%) for a combined model including all the abovementioned observed parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>sFlt-1/PlGF ratio alone had a low predictive value for adverse perinatal outcome, but when combined with EFW, its predictive performance was similar to that of EFW combined with Doppler parameters. Combining sFlt-1/PlGF ratio with EFW and Doppler criteria achieved the highest DR for adverse perinatal outcome, and additionally, might help to identify imminent pre-eclampsia in pregnancies complicated by fetal smallness. These findings support the use of angiogenic factors as an additional criterion to those currently used for identifying high-risk FGR among late-onset small fetuses, but do not support their use as a standalone biomarker. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"317-324"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angiogenic factors alone or in combination with ultrasound Doppler criteria for risk classification among late-onset small fetuses with or without pre-eclampsia.\",\"authors\":\"L Youssef, F Crispi, S Paolucci, J Miranda, S Lobmaier, F Crovetto, F Figueras, E Gratacos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/uog.29181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the prognostic value of maternal angiogenic factors in late-onset small fetuses, alone or in combination with the ultrasound and Doppler parameters currently used for the classification of low-risk small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses or high-risk fetal growth restriction (FGR), overall and according to the presence or absence of pre-eclampsia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study of women with a singleton pregnancy with a diagnosis of late-onset fetal smallness (defined as birth weight < 10<sup>th</sup> centile) and a gestational age of ≥ 34 weeks at delivery. Ultrasound assessment of estimated fetal weight (EFW) and Doppler assessment of uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) were performed every 1-2 weeks. Biochemical analysis of the angiogenic factors placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) in maternal peripheral venous blood samples was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay within 1-2 weeks after diagnosis of SGA or FGR. The primary outcome was adverse perinatal outcome, defined as a composite of emergency Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status, metabolic acidosis (umbilical artery pH < 7.0), neonatal unit admission and/or perinatal death. The predictive value of EFW < 3<sup>rd</sup> centile, Doppler parameters (UtA-PI > 95<sup>th</sup> centile and CPR < 5<sup>th</sup> centile) and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95<sup>th</sup> centile, alone or in combination, was assessed using logistic regression analysis in the overall population and stratified by presence or absence of pre-eclampsia developing at any time before delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 602 included cases, 91 (15.1%) developed pre-eclampsia and 511 (84.9%) did not. In the overall study population, all parameters were associated independently with adverse perinatal outcome: EFW < 3<sup>rd</sup> centile (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.58 (95% CI, 1.67-4.00)), UtA-PI > 95<sup>th</sup> centile (aOR, 1.92 (95% CI, 1.25-2.94)), CPR < 5<sup>th</sup> centile (aOR, 2.35 (95% CI, 1.46-3.78)) and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95<sup>th</sup> centile (aOR, 1.71 (95% CI, 1.09-2.69)). Only sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95<sup>th</sup> centile was associated independently with adverse perinatal outcome in cases with pre-eclampsia, whereas in those without pre-eclampsia, only EFW < 3<sup>rd</sup> centile and CPR < 5<sup>th</sup> centile were associated independently with adverse perinatal outcome. In the overall population, the detection rate (DR) and false-positive rate for adverse perinatal outcome were, respectively: 39.8% (95% CI, 31.7-47.9%) and 16.9% (95% CI, 10.7-23.1%) for sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95<sup>th</sup> centile alone; 86.8% (95% CI, 83.4-90.2%) and 61.9% (95% CI, 57.1-66.7%) for a combined model of EFW < 3<sup>rd</sup> centile, UtA-PI > 95<sup>th</sup> centile and CPR < 5<sup>th</sup> centile; 81.3% (95% CI, 77.3-85.3%) and 52.3% (95% CI, 47.1-57.5%) for a combined model of EFW < 3<sup>rd</sup> centile and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95<sup>th</sup> centile; and 88.5% (95% CI, 85.4-91.6%) and 64.5% (95% CI, 59.8-69.2%) for a combined model including all the abovementioned observed parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>sFlt-1/PlGF ratio alone had a low predictive value for adverse perinatal outcome, but when combined with EFW, its predictive performance was similar to that of EFW combined with Doppler parameters. Combining sFlt-1/PlGF ratio with EFW and Doppler criteria achieved the highest DR for adverse perinatal outcome, and additionally, might help to identify imminent pre-eclampsia in pregnancies complicated by fetal smallness. These findings support the use of angiogenic factors as an additional criterion to those currently used for identifying high-risk FGR among late-onset small fetuses, but do not support their use as a standalone biomarker. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"317-324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29181\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29181","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨母体血管生成因子在迟发性小胎中的预后价值,单独或联合目前用于低危小胎龄(SGA)胎或高危胎生受限(FGR)胎的超声和多普勒参数,总体上并根据是否存在先兆子痫。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为诊断为晚发型胎儿小(定义为出生体重百分位)且分娩时胎龄≥34周的单胎妊娠妇女。超声评估胎儿体重(EFW),多普勒评估子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI)和脑胎盘比(CPR)每1-2周。在诊断为SGA或FGR后1-2周内,采用酶联免疫吸附法对母体外周静脉血中血管生成因子胎盘生长因子(PlGF)和可溶性纤维样酪氨酸激酶-1 (sFlt-1)进行生化分析。主要结局是不良的围产期结局,定义为因胎儿状态不稳定而紧急剖宫产、代谢性酸中毒(脐动脉pH为1百分位,多普勒参数(UtA-PI为1百分位,95百分位,CPR为1百分位)和sFlt-1/PlGF比值(95百分位,单独或联合)的组合,在总体人群中使用logistic回归分析进行评估,并根据分娩前任何时间是否发生先兆子痫进行分层。结果:602例患者中,91例(15.1%)出现先兆子痫,511例(84.9%)未出现先兆子痫。在整个研究人群中,所有参数都与不良围产期结局独立相关:EFW rd百分位(校正优势比(aOR), 2.58 (95% CI, 1.67-4.00)), UtA-PI > 95百分位(aOR, 1.92 (95% CI, 1.25-2.94)), CPR第1百分位(aOR, 2.35 (95% CI, 1.46-3.78))和sFlt-1/PlGF比值> 95百分位(aOR, 1.71 (95% CI, 1.09-2.69))。在子痫前期患者中,只有sFlt-1/PlGF比值bbbb95百分位与不良围产期结局独立相关,而在无子痫前期患者中,只有EFW百分位和CPR百分位与不良围产期结局独立相关。在总体人群中,不良围产期结局的检出率(DR)和假阳性率分别为:仅第95百分位的sFlt-1/PlGF比值为39.8% (95% CI, 31.7-47.9%)和16.9% (95% CI, 10.7-23.1%);EFW rd百分位、UtA-PI bbb95百分位和CPR第th百分位的组合模型为86.8% (95% CI, 83.4-90.2%)和61.9% (95% CI, 57.1-66.7%);EFW rd百分位和sFlt-1/PlGF比值bbb95百分位的组合模型分别为81.3% (95% CI, 77.3-85.3%)和52.3% (95% CI, 47.1-57.5%);包括上述所有观测参数的组合模型为88.5% (95% CI, 85.4-91.6%)和64.5% (95% CI, 59.8-69.2%)。结论:单用sFlt-1/PlGF比值对围产期不良结局的预测价值较低,但联合EFW时,其预测效果与EFW联合多普勒参数相似。将sFlt-1/PlGF比值与EFW和多普勒标准相结合,对不良围产期结局的DR最高,此外,可能有助于识别胎儿小的妊娠中即将发生的先兆子痫。这些发现支持将血管生成因子作为目前用于识别晚发型小胎儿高危FGR的附加标准,但不支持将其作为独立的生物标志物。©2025国际妇产科超声学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Angiogenic factors alone or in combination with ultrasound Doppler criteria for risk classification among late-onset small fetuses with or without pre-eclampsia.

Objective: To investigate the prognostic value of maternal angiogenic factors in late-onset small fetuses, alone or in combination with the ultrasound and Doppler parameters currently used for the classification of low-risk small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses or high-risk fetal growth restriction (FGR), overall and according to the presence or absence of pre-eclampsia.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of women with a singleton pregnancy with a diagnosis of late-onset fetal smallness (defined as birth weight < 10th centile) and a gestational age of ≥ 34 weeks at delivery. Ultrasound assessment of estimated fetal weight (EFW) and Doppler assessment of uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) were performed every 1-2 weeks. Biochemical analysis of the angiogenic factors placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) in maternal peripheral venous blood samples was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay within 1-2 weeks after diagnosis of SGA or FGR. The primary outcome was adverse perinatal outcome, defined as a composite of emergency Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status, metabolic acidosis (umbilical artery pH < 7.0), neonatal unit admission and/or perinatal death. The predictive value of EFW < 3rd centile, Doppler parameters (UtA-PI > 95th centile and CPR < 5th centile) and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95th centile, alone or in combination, was assessed using logistic regression analysis in the overall population and stratified by presence or absence of pre-eclampsia developing at any time before delivery.

Results: Among the 602 included cases, 91 (15.1%) developed pre-eclampsia and 511 (84.9%) did not. In the overall study population, all parameters were associated independently with adverse perinatal outcome: EFW < 3rd centile (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.58 (95% CI, 1.67-4.00)), UtA-PI > 95th centile (aOR, 1.92 (95% CI, 1.25-2.94)), CPR < 5th centile (aOR, 2.35 (95% CI, 1.46-3.78)) and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95th centile (aOR, 1.71 (95% CI, 1.09-2.69)). Only sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95th centile was associated independently with adverse perinatal outcome in cases with pre-eclampsia, whereas in those without pre-eclampsia, only EFW < 3rd centile and CPR < 5th centile were associated independently with adverse perinatal outcome. In the overall population, the detection rate (DR) and false-positive rate for adverse perinatal outcome were, respectively: 39.8% (95% CI, 31.7-47.9%) and 16.9% (95% CI, 10.7-23.1%) for sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95th centile alone; 86.8% (95% CI, 83.4-90.2%) and 61.9% (95% CI, 57.1-66.7%) for a combined model of EFW < 3rd centile, UtA-PI > 95th centile and CPR < 5th centile; 81.3% (95% CI, 77.3-85.3%) and 52.3% (95% CI, 47.1-57.5%) for a combined model of EFW < 3rd centile and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 95th centile; and 88.5% (95% CI, 85.4-91.6%) and 64.5% (95% CI, 59.8-69.2%) for a combined model including all the abovementioned observed parameters.

Conclusions: sFlt-1/PlGF ratio alone had a low predictive value for adverse perinatal outcome, but when combined with EFW, its predictive performance was similar to that of EFW combined with Doppler parameters. Combining sFlt-1/PlGF ratio with EFW and Doppler criteria achieved the highest DR for adverse perinatal outcome, and additionally, might help to identify imminent pre-eclampsia in pregnancies complicated by fetal smallness. These findings support the use of angiogenic factors as an additional criterion to those currently used for identifying high-risk FGR among late-onset small fetuses, but do not support their use as a standalone biomarker. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.10%
发文量
891
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信