手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)在急性憩室炎结肠切除术中替代非计划腹腔镜开放手术(LCOS)。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Satyam K Ghodasara, Jana K Elsawwah, Stephanie S Hyon, Joseph S Flanagan, Patricia B Stopper, Rolando H Rolandelli, Zoltan H Nemeth
{"title":"手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)在急性憩室炎结肠切除术中替代非计划腹腔镜开放手术(LCOS)。","authors":"Satyam K Ghodasara, Jana K Elsawwah, Stephanie S Hyon, Joseph S Flanagan, Patricia B Stopper, Rolando H Rolandelli, Zoltan H Nemeth","doi":"10.1177/15533506251317288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In difficult colorectal cases, surgeons may opt for a hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALS) colectomy or attempt a laparoscopic surgery that may require an unplanned conversion to open (LCOS). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of these 2 types of surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Colectomies for acute diverticulitis with a HALS or LCOS surgery were selected from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2022 Targeted Colectomy Database. After confirming a difference in propensity scores between the cohorts, they were matched using propensity score matching (PSM) based on preoperative factors. RStudio was utilized for filtering and performing the PSM, while Minitab was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 804 HALS colectomies and 284 LCOS colectomies. After PSM, both cohorts contained 284 patients. Absolute standardized mean errors for all matched factors were less than 0.1, confirming well-balanced cohorts. Following PSM, preoperative and perioperative factors were similar between both colectomy groups. Postoperatively, HALS surgeries had a shorter average length of stay (7.67 ± 0.38 vs 10.57 ± 0.41, <i>P</i> < 0.001) as well as lower rates of ileus (13.73% vs 22.54%, <i>P</i> = 0.007) and superficial surgical site infection (2.11% vs 5.28%, <i>P</i> = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national database study comparing HALS and LCOS colectomies. After accounting for confounding variables, our PSM analysis showed the benefits of HALS colectomies for acute diverticulitis. Future studies may use single-center data containing risk adjustment profiles to create an even more uniform comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251317288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (HALS) as an Alternative to Unplanned Laparoscopic Conversion to Open Surgery (LCOS) in Colectomies for Acute Diverticulitis.\",\"authors\":\"Satyam K Ghodasara, Jana K Elsawwah, Stephanie S Hyon, Joseph S Flanagan, Patricia B Stopper, Rolando H Rolandelli, Zoltan H Nemeth\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506251317288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In difficult colorectal cases, surgeons may opt for a hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALS) colectomy or attempt a laparoscopic surgery that may require an unplanned conversion to open (LCOS). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of these 2 types of surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Colectomies for acute diverticulitis with a HALS or LCOS surgery were selected from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2022 Targeted Colectomy Database. After confirming a difference in propensity scores between the cohorts, they were matched using propensity score matching (PSM) based on preoperative factors. RStudio was utilized for filtering and performing the PSM, while Minitab was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 804 HALS colectomies and 284 LCOS colectomies. After PSM, both cohorts contained 284 patients. Absolute standardized mean errors for all matched factors were less than 0.1, confirming well-balanced cohorts. Following PSM, preoperative and perioperative factors were similar between both colectomy groups. Postoperatively, HALS surgeries had a shorter average length of stay (7.67 ± 0.38 vs 10.57 ± 0.41, <i>P</i> < 0.001) as well as lower rates of ileus (13.73% vs 22.54%, <i>P</i> = 0.007) and superficial surgical site infection (2.11% vs 5.28%, <i>P</i> = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national database study comparing HALS and LCOS colectomies. After accounting for confounding variables, our PSM analysis showed the benefits of HALS colectomies for acute diverticulitis. Future studies may use single-center data containing risk adjustment profiles to create an even more uniform comparison.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15533506251317288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251317288\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251317288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在困难的结直肠病例中,外科医生可能会选择手辅助腹腔镜(HALS)结肠切除术或尝试可能需要非计划转换的腹腔镜手术(LCOS)。我们的目的是比较这两种手术的临床结果。方法:从美国外科医师学会(ACS)国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP) 2022年靶向结肠切除术数据库中选择急性憩室炎结肠切除术合并HALS或LCOS手术。在确认队列之间倾向评分的差异后,根据术前因素使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行匹配。使用RStudio筛选和执行PSM,使用Minitab进行统计分析。结果:共发现HALS结肠804例,LCOS结肠284例。在PSM后,两个队列均包含284例患者。所有匹配因素的绝对标准化平均误差小于0.1,证实了队列的良好平衡。PSM后,两组结肠切除术患者术前及围手术期因素相似。术后平均住院时间较短(7.67±0.38 vs 10.57±0.41,P < 0.001),肠梗阻发生率较低(13.73% vs 22.54%, P = 0.007),手术部位浅表感染发生率较低(2.11% vs 5.28%, P = 0.045)。结论:据我们所知,这是第一个比较HALS和LCOS的国家数据库研究。在考虑了混杂变量后,我们的PSM分析显示了HALS结肠对急性憩室炎的益处。未来的研究可能会使用包含风险调整概况的单中心数据来创建更统一的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (HALS) as an Alternative to Unplanned Laparoscopic Conversion to Open Surgery (LCOS) in Colectomies for Acute Diverticulitis.

Background: In difficult colorectal cases, surgeons may opt for a hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALS) colectomy or attempt a laparoscopic surgery that may require an unplanned conversion to open (LCOS). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of these 2 types of surgeries.

Methods: Colectomies for acute diverticulitis with a HALS or LCOS surgery were selected from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2022 Targeted Colectomy Database. After confirming a difference in propensity scores between the cohorts, they were matched using propensity score matching (PSM) based on preoperative factors. RStudio was utilized for filtering and performing the PSM, while Minitab was used for statistical analysis.

Results: We identified 804 HALS colectomies and 284 LCOS colectomies. After PSM, both cohorts contained 284 patients. Absolute standardized mean errors for all matched factors were less than 0.1, confirming well-balanced cohorts. Following PSM, preoperative and perioperative factors were similar between both colectomy groups. Postoperatively, HALS surgeries had a shorter average length of stay (7.67 ± 0.38 vs 10.57 ± 0.41, P < 0.001) as well as lower rates of ileus (13.73% vs 22.54%, P = 0.007) and superficial surgical site infection (2.11% vs 5.28%, P = 0.045).

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national database study comparing HALS and LCOS colectomies. After accounting for confounding variables, our PSM analysis showed the benefits of HALS colectomies for acute diverticulitis. Future studies may use single-center data containing risk adjustment profiles to create an even more uniform comparison.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信