Karen Diepstra, Daniel Westreich, Agatha Bula, Clara Lemani, John Chapola, Jennifer Winston, Katie Mollan, Jill Hagey, Sam Phiri, Jane Chiwoko, Lameck Chinula, Mina C Hosseinipour, Mackenzie Cottrell, Audrey Pettifor, Mollie E Wood, Jennifer H Tang
{"title":"异烟肼预防结核病对艾滋病毒感染者妊娠风险的影响,抗逆转录病毒治疗和以孕激素为基础的激素避孕。","authors":"Karen Diepstra, Daniel Westreich, Agatha Bula, Clara Lemani, John Chapola, Jennifer Winston, Katie Mollan, Jill Hagey, Sam Phiri, Jane Chiwoko, Lameck Chinula, Mina C Hosseinipour, Mackenzie Cottrell, Audrey Pettifor, Mollie E Wood, Jennifer H Tang","doi":"10.1002/pds.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Concomitant use of antiretroviral therapy (ART), hormonal contraception, and isonicotinic acid hydrazide (isoniazid) for tuberculosis prevention is common among women of reproductive age who are living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. We estimated the effect of isoniazid on 6-month pregnancy risk among Malawian women living with HIV in the Family Planning and Antiretroviral Therapy (FP-ART) prospective cohort study, overall and among subgroups defined by ART regimen type and hormonal contraceptive method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analytic sample included visits contributed by participants who were currently using either efavirenz- or dolutegravir-based ART and either depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or levonorgestrel (LNG) implant contraception at the time of the visit. The exposure was self-reported, current isoniazid use (yes/no). The binary outcome measure, 6-month pregnancy, was defined as an estimated conception date 1-183 days after the study visit date. We used a marginal structural linear risk regression model with inverse probability of treatment weights, multiple imputation by chained equations, and bootstrapping to estimate risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 4709 study visits occurring between September 2017 and June 2021. The weighted 6-month pregnancy risk among isoniazid use visits was 3.0% compared with 2.3% among non-use visits (RD 0.7%, 95% CI: -0.7%, 2.1%), and the results were qualitatively similar for all subgroup estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find a clinically significant effect of isoniazid use on 6-month pregnancy incidence among women concomitantly using ART and either DMPA or LNG implant contraception.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 2","pages":"e70105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Isoniazid for Tuberculosis Prevention on Pregnancy Risk Among Women Living With HIV on Antiretroviral Treatment and Progestin-Based Hormonal Contraception.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Diepstra, Daniel Westreich, Agatha Bula, Clara Lemani, John Chapola, Jennifer Winston, Katie Mollan, Jill Hagey, Sam Phiri, Jane Chiwoko, Lameck Chinula, Mina C Hosseinipour, Mackenzie Cottrell, Audrey Pettifor, Mollie E Wood, Jennifer H Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Concomitant use of antiretroviral therapy (ART), hormonal contraception, and isonicotinic acid hydrazide (isoniazid) for tuberculosis prevention is common among women of reproductive age who are living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. We estimated the effect of isoniazid on 6-month pregnancy risk among Malawian women living with HIV in the Family Planning and Antiretroviral Therapy (FP-ART) prospective cohort study, overall and among subgroups defined by ART regimen type and hormonal contraceptive method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analytic sample included visits contributed by participants who were currently using either efavirenz- or dolutegravir-based ART and either depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or levonorgestrel (LNG) implant contraception at the time of the visit. The exposure was self-reported, current isoniazid use (yes/no). The binary outcome measure, 6-month pregnancy, was defined as an estimated conception date 1-183 days after the study visit date. We used a marginal structural linear risk regression model with inverse probability of treatment weights, multiple imputation by chained equations, and bootstrapping to estimate risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 4709 study visits occurring between September 2017 and June 2021. The weighted 6-month pregnancy risk among isoniazid use visits was 3.0% compared with 2.3% among non-use visits (RD 0.7%, 95% CI: -0.7%, 2.1%), and the results were qualitatively similar for all subgroup estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find a clinically significant effect of isoniazid use on 6-month pregnancy incidence among women concomitantly using ART and either DMPA or LNG implant contraception.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"e70105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70105\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Isoniazid for Tuberculosis Prevention on Pregnancy Risk Among Women Living With HIV on Antiretroviral Treatment and Progestin-Based Hormonal Contraception.
Purpose: Concomitant use of antiretroviral therapy (ART), hormonal contraception, and isonicotinic acid hydrazide (isoniazid) for tuberculosis prevention is common among women of reproductive age who are living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. We estimated the effect of isoniazid on 6-month pregnancy risk among Malawian women living with HIV in the Family Planning and Antiretroviral Therapy (FP-ART) prospective cohort study, overall and among subgroups defined by ART regimen type and hormonal contraceptive method.
Methods: The analytic sample included visits contributed by participants who were currently using either efavirenz- or dolutegravir-based ART and either depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or levonorgestrel (LNG) implant contraception at the time of the visit. The exposure was self-reported, current isoniazid use (yes/no). The binary outcome measure, 6-month pregnancy, was defined as an estimated conception date 1-183 days after the study visit date. We used a marginal structural linear risk regression model with inverse probability of treatment weights, multiple imputation by chained equations, and bootstrapping to estimate risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: The analytic sample included 4709 study visits occurring between September 2017 and June 2021. The weighted 6-month pregnancy risk among isoniazid use visits was 3.0% compared with 2.3% among non-use visits (RD 0.7%, 95% CI: -0.7%, 2.1%), and the results were qualitatively similar for all subgroup estimates.
Conclusions: We did not find a clinically significant effect of isoniazid use on 6-month pregnancy incidence among women concomitantly using ART and either DMPA or LNG implant contraception.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.