维生素B6膳食补充剂剂量最大化的调节作用对神经病变报告模式的影响。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Florence van Hunsel, Joep Scholl, Misha Vrolijk, Corine Ekhart
{"title":"维生素B6膳食补充剂剂量最大化的调节作用对神经病变报告模式的影响。","authors":"Florence van Hunsel, Joep Scholl, Misha Vrolijk, Corine Ekhart","doi":"10.1002/pds.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vitamin B6 deficiency is linked to neurological disorders. However, supplementation with high doses of vitamin B6 has also been linked to neuropathy as an adverse drug reaction. Review of cases from the Dutch Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) and other data led to a regulatory action to lower the maximum daily dose (DD) of vitamin B6 in supplements to 21 mg/day from October 1, 2018.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate if there was an effect of the regulatory action in 2018 on maximum daily dosage for vitamin B6 on the reporting pattern of neuropathy to the SRS in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated trends in the number of reports received until December 31, 2023, DD mentioned in the reports, and the correlation between DD and plasma vitamin B6 levels. A change point analysis was used to get insight into the pattern of reports over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twenty-four reports were included. After the regulatory action for dose maximization from October 2018, only one report mentions a dosage which is much higher than the recommended 21 mg DD. Only 15% of the variability in plasma levels mentioned in reports can be explained by the DD. Twelve statistical change points were noted, especially around some peaks in the reporting pattern for instance in 2018. However, from the second half of 2019, the number of reports on vitamin B6 and neuropathy per time period is lower and no change points were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our study has limitations, we clearly see an effect of regulatory action on the doses of vitamin B6 used in neuropathy reports. However, some cases describing neuropathy related to vitamin B6 supplementation with lower doses are still reported after the regulatory action in 2018. Therefore, the association between low-dose vitamin B6 products and neuropathy should be studied further.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 2","pages":"e70108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11779544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Regulatory Action on Dose Maximalization for Vitamin B6 Dietary Supplements on the Reporting Pattern for Neuropathy.\",\"authors\":\"Florence van Hunsel, Joep Scholl, Misha Vrolijk, Corine Ekhart\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vitamin B6 deficiency is linked to neurological disorders. However, supplementation with high doses of vitamin B6 has also been linked to neuropathy as an adverse drug reaction. Review of cases from the Dutch Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) and other data led to a regulatory action to lower the maximum daily dose (DD) of vitamin B6 in supplements to 21 mg/day from October 1, 2018.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate if there was an effect of the regulatory action in 2018 on maximum daily dosage for vitamin B6 on the reporting pattern of neuropathy to the SRS in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated trends in the number of reports received until December 31, 2023, DD mentioned in the reports, and the correlation between DD and plasma vitamin B6 levels. A change point analysis was used to get insight into the pattern of reports over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twenty-four reports were included. After the regulatory action for dose maximization from October 2018, only one report mentions a dosage which is much higher than the recommended 21 mg DD. Only 15% of the variability in plasma levels mentioned in reports can be explained by the DD. Twelve statistical change points were noted, especially around some peaks in the reporting pattern for instance in 2018. However, from the second half of 2019, the number of reports on vitamin B6 and neuropathy per time period is lower and no change points were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our study has limitations, we clearly see an effect of regulatory action on the doses of vitamin B6 used in neuropathy reports. However, some cases describing neuropathy related to vitamin B6 supplementation with lower doses are still reported after the regulatory action in 2018. Therefore, the association between low-dose vitamin B6 products and neuropathy should be studied further.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"e70108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11779544/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:维生素B6缺乏与神经系统疾病有关。然而,补充高剂量维生素B6也与神经病变有关,作为一种不良药物反应。对荷兰自发报告系统(SRS)病例和其他数据的审查导致监管行动,从2018年10月1日起将补充剂中维生素B6的最大日剂量(DD)降低至21毫克/天。目的:本研究的目的是调查2018年关于维生素B6最大日剂量的监管行动是否对荷兰SRS的神经病变报告模式有影响。方法:调查截至2023年12月31日收到的报告数量趋势、报告中提到的DD以及DD与血浆维生素B6水平的相关性。变更点分析用于深入了解报告随时间变化的模式。结果:共纳入224份报告。在2018年10月剂量最大化监管行动之后,只有一份报告提到的剂量远高于推荐的21mg DD。报告中提到的血浆水平变异性中只有15%可以用DD来解释。我们注意到12个统计变化点,特别是在报告模式的一些峰值周围,例如2018年。然而,从2019年下半年开始,每个时间段关于维生素B6和神经病变的报告数量减少,没有发现变化点。结论:尽管我们的研究有局限性,但我们清楚地看到了调节作用对神经病变报告中使用的维生素B6剂量的影响。然而,在2018年的监管行动之后,仍有一些病例描述了与低剂量维生素B6补充相关的神经病变。因此,应进一步研究低剂量维生素B6产品与神经病变之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Regulatory Action on Dose Maximalization for Vitamin B6 Dietary Supplements on the Reporting Pattern for Neuropathy.

Background: Vitamin B6 deficiency is linked to neurological disorders. However, supplementation with high doses of vitamin B6 has also been linked to neuropathy as an adverse drug reaction. Review of cases from the Dutch Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) and other data led to a regulatory action to lower the maximum daily dose (DD) of vitamin B6 in supplements to 21 mg/day from October 1, 2018.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate if there was an effect of the regulatory action in 2018 on maximum daily dosage for vitamin B6 on the reporting pattern of neuropathy to the SRS in the Netherlands.

Methods: We investigated trends in the number of reports received until December 31, 2023, DD mentioned in the reports, and the correlation between DD and plasma vitamin B6 levels. A change point analysis was used to get insight into the pattern of reports over time.

Results: Two hundred and twenty-four reports were included. After the regulatory action for dose maximization from October 2018, only one report mentions a dosage which is much higher than the recommended 21 mg DD. Only 15% of the variability in plasma levels mentioned in reports can be explained by the DD. Twelve statistical change points were noted, especially around some peaks in the reporting pattern for instance in 2018. However, from the second half of 2019, the number of reports on vitamin B6 and neuropathy per time period is lower and no change points were detected.

Conclusions: Although our study has limitations, we clearly see an effect of regulatory action on the doses of vitamin B6 used in neuropathy reports. However, some cases describing neuropathy related to vitamin B6 supplementation with lower doses are still reported after the regulatory action in 2018. Therefore, the association between low-dose vitamin B6 products and neuropathy should be studied further.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信