产前无创无细胞DNA筛查后性别预测与胎儿性别的差异

IF 3.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of the Endocrine Society Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1210/jendso/bvaf007
Selma F Witchel, Aleksandar Rajkovic, Svetlana A Yatsenko
{"title":"产前无创无细胞DNA筛查后性别预测与胎儿性别的差异","authors":"Selma F Witchel, Aleksandar Rajkovic, Svetlana A Yatsenko","doi":"10.1210/jendso/bvaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the last 10 years the field of prenatal diagnosis has been significantly reshaped followed by the implementation of noninvasive prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing methodologies in clinical practice. Based on a superior performance and higher sensitivity and specificity than the former practice of biochemical markers screening, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommend noninvasive prenatal cfDNA screening for trisomy 21, 18, 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidy to all pregnant people. While cfDNA screening is helpful in risk assessment for the most common autosomal trisomies, cfDNA also provides information about fetal sex chromosomes. Prediction of fetal sex is highly desired by the parents and also useful to healthcare providers for management of pregnancies that are at-risk for X-linked conditions. In fact, utilization of cfDNA screening has resulted in a significant number of referrals to evaluate discordant results for cfDNA sex prediction and appearance of fetal genitalia by prenatal ultrasound scan or at birth raising concerns about the fetus/infant atypical sex development known as a difference in sex development (DSD). In this mini-review, we outline principles and limitations of cfDNA technology, summarize recent findings related to cfDNA test performance in prediction of sex chromosome abnormalities and DSD conditions, define the technical and biological causes of discrepant results, provide recommendations to consolidate efforts by prenatal and clinical management teams in challenging situations, and discuss ethical considerations associated with fetal sex prediction and prenatal DSD diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17334,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","volume":"9 2","pages":"bvaf007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancies Between Sex Prediction and Fetal Sex After Prenatal Noninvasive Cell-Free DNA Screening.\",\"authors\":\"Selma F Witchel, Aleksandar Rajkovic, Svetlana A Yatsenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/jendso/bvaf007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the last 10 years the field of prenatal diagnosis has been significantly reshaped followed by the implementation of noninvasive prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing methodologies in clinical practice. Based on a superior performance and higher sensitivity and specificity than the former practice of biochemical markers screening, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommend noninvasive prenatal cfDNA screening for trisomy 21, 18, 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidy to all pregnant people. While cfDNA screening is helpful in risk assessment for the most common autosomal trisomies, cfDNA also provides information about fetal sex chromosomes. Prediction of fetal sex is highly desired by the parents and also useful to healthcare providers for management of pregnancies that are at-risk for X-linked conditions. In fact, utilization of cfDNA screening has resulted in a significant number of referrals to evaluate discordant results for cfDNA sex prediction and appearance of fetal genitalia by prenatal ultrasound scan or at birth raising concerns about the fetus/infant atypical sex development known as a difference in sex development (DSD). In this mini-review, we outline principles and limitations of cfDNA technology, summarize recent findings related to cfDNA test performance in prediction of sex chromosome abnormalities and DSD conditions, define the technical and biological causes of discrepant results, provide recommendations to consolidate efforts by prenatal and clinical management teams in challenging situations, and discuss ethical considerations associated with fetal sex prediction and prenatal DSD diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Endocrine Society\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"bvaf007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775114/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Endocrine Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的10年里,产前诊断领域已经显著重塑,随后在临床实践中实施了非侵入性产前无细胞DNA (cfDNA)检测方法。美国妇产科医师学会和美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会推荐对所有孕妇进行无创产前cfDNA筛查,以更好的性能和更高的灵敏度和特异性,而不是以往的生化标记筛查。虽然cfDNA筛查有助于对最常见的常染色体三体进行风险评估,但cfDNA也提供了胎儿性染色体的信息。胎儿性别的预测是父母非常需要的,对医疗保健提供者来说,对有x连锁疾病风险的妊娠管理也很有用。事实上,cfDNA筛查的使用导致了大量的转诊,以评估cfDNA性别预测和产前超声扫描胎儿生殖器外观的不一致结果,或在出生时引起对胎儿/婴儿非典型性别发育的担忧,即性别发育差异(DSD)。在这篇简短的综述中,我们概述了cfDNA技术的原理和局限性,总结了cfDNA检测在预测性染色体异常和DSD疾病方面的最新发现,定义了结果差异的技术和生物学原因,为产前和临床管理团队在具有挑战性的情况下加强工作提供了建议,并讨论了与胎儿性别预测和产前DSD诊断相关的伦理考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrepancies Between Sex Prediction and Fetal Sex After Prenatal Noninvasive Cell-Free DNA Screening.

In the last 10 years the field of prenatal diagnosis has been significantly reshaped followed by the implementation of noninvasive prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing methodologies in clinical practice. Based on a superior performance and higher sensitivity and specificity than the former practice of biochemical markers screening, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommend noninvasive prenatal cfDNA screening for trisomy 21, 18, 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidy to all pregnant people. While cfDNA screening is helpful in risk assessment for the most common autosomal trisomies, cfDNA also provides information about fetal sex chromosomes. Prediction of fetal sex is highly desired by the parents and also useful to healthcare providers for management of pregnancies that are at-risk for X-linked conditions. In fact, utilization of cfDNA screening has resulted in a significant number of referrals to evaluate discordant results for cfDNA sex prediction and appearance of fetal genitalia by prenatal ultrasound scan or at birth raising concerns about the fetus/infant atypical sex development known as a difference in sex development (DSD). In this mini-review, we outline principles and limitations of cfDNA technology, summarize recent findings related to cfDNA test performance in prediction of sex chromosome abnormalities and DSD conditions, define the technical and biological causes of discrepant results, provide recommendations to consolidate efforts by prenatal and clinical management teams in challenging situations, and discuss ethical considerations associated with fetal sex prediction and prenatal DSD diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Journal of the Endocrine Society Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信