自然语言处理识别血液透析患者症状记录不足

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000694
Yang Dai, Huei Hsun Wen, Joanna Yang, Neepa Gupta, Connie Rhee, Carol R Horowitz, Dinushika Mohottige, Girish N Nadkarni, Steven Coca, Lili Chan
{"title":"自然语言处理识别血液透析患者症状记录不足","authors":"Yang Dai, Huei Hsun Wen, Joanna Yang, Neepa Gupta, Connie Rhee, Carol R Horowitz, Dinushika Mohottige, Girish N Nadkarni, Steven Coca, Lili Chan","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients on hemodialysis (HD) have a high burden of emotional and physical symptoms. These symptoms are often under-recognized. NLP can be used to identify patient symptoms from the EHR. However, whether symptom documentation matches patient reported burden is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective study of patients seen at an ambulatory nephrology practice from September 2020 to April 2021. We collected symptom surveys from patients, nurses, and physicians. We then developed a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to identify symptoms from the patients' electronic health records (EHR) and validated the performance of this algorithm using manual chart review and patient surveys as a reference standard. Using patient surveys as the reference standard, we compared symptom identification by 1) physicians, 2) nurses, 3) physicians or nurses, and 4) NLP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 97 patients into our study, 63% were female, 49% were Non-Hispanic Black, and 41% were Hispanic. The most common symptoms reported by patients were fatigue (61%), cramping (59%), dry skin (53%), muscle soreness (43%), and itching (41%). Physicians and nurses significantly under-recognized patients' symptoms (sensitivity 0.51 (95% CI 0.40-0.61) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.52-0.72) respectively). Nurses were better at identifying symptoms when patients reported more severe symptoms. There was no difference in results by patients' sex or ethnicity. NLP had a sensitivity of 0.92, specificity of 0.95, PPV of 0.75, and NPV of 0.99 with manual EHR review as the reference standard, and a sensitivity of 0.58 (95% CI 0.47-0.68), specificity of 0.73 (95% CI 0.48-0.89), PPV of 0.92 (95% CI 0.82-0.97), and NPV of 0.24 (95% CI 0.14-0.38) compared with patient surveys.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While patients on HD report high prevalence of symptoms, symptoms are under-recognized and under-documented. NLP was accurate at identifying symptoms when they were documented. Larger studies in representative populations are needed to assess the generalizability of the results of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural Language Processing Identifies Under-Documentation of Symptoms in Patients on Hemodialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Dai, Huei Hsun Wen, Joanna Yang, Neepa Gupta, Connie Rhee, Carol R Horowitz, Dinushika Mohottige, Girish N Nadkarni, Steven Coca, Lili Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.34067/KID.0000000694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients on hemodialysis (HD) have a high burden of emotional and physical symptoms. These symptoms are often under-recognized. NLP can be used to identify patient symptoms from the EHR. However, whether symptom documentation matches patient reported burden is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective study of patients seen at an ambulatory nephrology practice from September 2020 to April 2021. We collected symptom surveys from patients, nurses, and physicians. We then developed a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to identify symptoms from the patients' electronic health records (EHR) and validated the performance of this algorithm using manual chart review and patient surveys as a reference standard. Using patient surveys as the reference standard, we compared symptom identification by 1) physicians, 2) nurses, 3) physicians or nurses, and 4) NLP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 97 patients into our study, 63% were female, 49% were Non-Hispanic Black, and 41% were Hispanic. The most common symptoms reported by patients were fatigue (61%), cramping (59%), dry skin (53%), muscle soreness (43%), and itching (41%). Physicians and nurses significantly under-recognized patients' symptoms (sensitivity 0.51 (95% CI 0.40-0.61) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.52-0.72) respectively). Nurses were better at identifying symptoms when patients reported more severe symptoms. There was no difference in results by patients' sex or ethnicity. NLP had a sensitivity of 0.92, specificity of 0.95, PPV of 0.75, and NPV of 0.99 with manual EHR review as the reference standard, and a sensitivity of 0.58 (95% CI 0.47-0.68), specificity of 0.73 (95% CI 0.48-0.89), PPV of 0.92 (95% CI 0.82-0.97), and NPV of 0.24 (95% CI 0.14-0.38) compared with patient surveys.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While patients on HD report high prevalence of symptoms, symptoms are under-recognized and under-documented. NLP was accurate at identifying symptoms when they were documented. Larger studies in representative populations are needed to assess the generalizability of the results of the study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney360\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000694\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血液透析(HD)患者有很高的情绪和身体症状负担。这些症状往往没有得到充分认识。NLP可用于从电子病历中识别患者症状。然而,症状记录是否与患者报告的负担相符尚不清楚。方法:我们对2020年9月至2021年4月在门诊肾脏病科就诊的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。我们收集了患者、护士和医生的症状调查。然后,我们开发了一种自然语言处理(NLP)算法来从患者的电子健康记录(EHR)中识别症状,并使用手动图表审查和患者调查作为参考标准验证了该算法的性能。我们以患者调查作为参考标准,比较了1)医生、2)护士、3)医生或护士和4)NLP的症状识别。结果:我们纳入了97例患者,63%为女性,49%为非西班牙裔黑人,41%为西班牙裔。患者报告的最常见症状是疲劳(61%)、痉挛(59%)、皮肤干燥(53%)、肌肉酸痛(43%)和瘙痒(41%)。医生和护士明显低估了患者的症状(敏感性分别为0.51 (95% CI 0.40-0.61)和0.63 (95% CI 0.52-0.72))。当病人报告的症状更严重时,护士更善于识别症状。患者的性别和种族在结果上没有差异。以人工EHR为参考标准,NLP的敏感性为0.92,特异性为0.95,PPV为0.75,NPV为0.99;与患者调查相比,NLP的敏感性为0.58 (95% CI 0.47-0.68),特异性为0.73 (95% CI 0.48-0.89), PPV为0.92 (95% CI 0.82-0.97), NPV为0.24 (95% CI 0.14-0.38)。结论:虽然HD患者报告的症状患病率很高,但症状未被充分认识和记录。当记录症状时,NLP在识别症状方面是准确的。需要在代表性人群中进行更大规模的研究,以评估研究结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Natural Language Processing Identifies Under-Documentation of Symptoms in Patients on Hemodialysis.

Background: Patients on hemodialysis (HD) have a high burden of emotional and physical symptoms. These symptoms are often under-recognized. NLP can be used to identify patient symptoms from the EHR. However, whether symptom documentation matches patient reported burden is unclear.

Methods: We conducted a prospective study of patients seen at an ambulatory nephrology practice from September 2020 to April 2021. We collected symptom surveys from patients, nurses, and physicians. We then developed a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to identify symptoms from the patients' electronic health records (EHR) and validated the performance of this algorithm using manual chart review and patient surveys as a reference standard. Using patient surveys as the reference standard, we compared symptom identification by 1) physicians, 2) nurses, 3) physicians or nurses, and 4) NLP.

Results: We enrolled 97 patients into our study, 63% were female, 49% were Non-Hispanic Black, and 41% were Hispanic. The most common symptoms reported by patients were fatigue (61%), cramping (59%), dry skin (53%), muscle soreness (43%), and itching (41%). Physicians and nurses significantly under-recognized patients' symptoms (sensitivity 0.51 (95% CI 0.40-0.61) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.52-0.72) respectively). Nurses were better at identifying symptoms when patients reported more severe symptoms. There was no difference in results by patients' sex or ethnicity. NLP had a sensitivity of 0.92, specificity of 0.95, PPV of 0.75, and NPV of 0.99 with manual EHR review as the reference standard, and a sensitivity of 0.58 (95% CI 0.47-0.68), specificity of 0.73 (95% CI 0.48-0.89), PPV of 0.92 (95% CI 0.82-0.97), and NPV of 0.24 (95% CI 0.14-0.38) compared with patient surveys.

Conclusions: While patients on HD report high prevalence of symptoms, symptoms are under-recognized and under-documented. NLP was accurate at identifying symptoms when they were documented. Larger studies in representative populations are needed to assess the generalizability of the results of the study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信