Ayomide Michael Ade-Conde, Brendan Amoyaw, Yoan Bourgeault-Gagnon, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Nicole Simunovic, Olufemi R. Ayeni
{"title":"缺乏有效的患者报告的结果工具仍然存在于儿童和青少年髋关节镜。","authors":"Ayomide Michael Ade-Conde, Brendan Amoyaw, Yoan Bourgeault-Gagnon, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Nicole Simunovic, Olufemi R. Ayeni","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review aimed to (1) identify commonly used patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools in paediatric hip arthroscopy and (2) assess whether the PROs used in this population have been formally validated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL, from inception to 31 March 2024 and 22 August 2024, respectively, followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The first search identified PRO instruments used in studies on hip arthroscopy in patients aged 19 and under. The second focused on the clinimetric properties of these tools in paediatric hip arthroscopy. PRO utilization was stratified by pathology, trends over time and publication type. Use of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments tool, and a descriptive analysis, were planned to assess the eligible clinimetric studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-seven studies were included, identifying 10 hip-specific and 5 nonspecific PROs. The second search did not identify any clinimetric studies on these tools used in paediatric patients. The most commonly reported hip-specific PRO were the modified Hip Harris Score (<i>n</i> = 48), the Hip Outcome Score–Sport-Specific Subscale (<i>n</i> = 25) and the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (<i>n</i> = 20). Hip arthroscopy was used to treat over seven different conditions, with femoroacetabular impingement being the most common (<i>n</i> = 41, 77%). Between 2005 and 2024, the variety of hip-specific PROs increased, with seven new ones introduced by 2019–2024. Additionally, this study found a relatively equal distribution of outcomes across presentation abstracts and manuscripts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The key finding of this study is the ongoing lack of hip-specific PRO tools in the paediatric hip arthroscopy literature, with reliance on adult-derived instruments. The absence of clinimetric studies and heterogeneity in PRO use emphasises the need for standardized, paediatric-specific tools. Developing and validating such instruments should be prioritized to ensure accurate, age-appropriate outcome assessment and care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17880,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","volume":"33 5","pages":"1863-1873"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ksa.12603","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of validated patient-reported outcome tools persists in paediatric and adolescent hip arthroscopy—A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Ayomide Michael Ade-Conde, Brendan Amoyaw, Yoan Bourgeault-Gagnon, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Nicole Simunovic, Olufemi R. Ayeni\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This systematic review aimed to (1) identify commonly used patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools in paediatric hip arthroscopy and (2) assess whether the PROs used in this population have been formally validated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL, from inception to 31 March 2024 and 22 August 2024, respectively, followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The first search identified PRO instruments used in studies on hip arthroscopy in patients aged 19 and under. The second focused on the clinimetric properties of these tools in paediatric hip arthroscopy. PRO utilization was stratified by pathology, trends over time and publication type. Use of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments tool, and a descriptive analysis, were planned to assess the eligible clinimetric studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifty-seven studies were included, identifying 10 hip-specific and 5 nonspecific PROs. The second search did not identify any clinimetric studies on these tools used in paediatric patients. The most commonly reported hip-specific PRO were the modified Hip Harris Score (<i>n</i> = 48), the Hip Outcome Score–Sport-Specific Subscale (<i>n</i> = 25) and the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (<i>n</i> = 20). Hip arthroscopy was used to treat over seven different conditions, with femoroacetabular impingement being the most common (<i>n</i> = 41, 77%). Between 2005 and 2024, the variety of hip-specific PROs increased, with seven new ones introduced by 2019–2024. Additionally, this study found a relatively equal distribution of outcomes across presentation abstracts and manuscripts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The key finding of this study is the ongoing lack of hip-specific PRO tools in the paediatric hip arthroscopy literature, with reliance on adult-derived instruments. The absence of clinimetric studies and heterogeneity in PRO use emphasises the need for standardized, paediatric-specific tools. Developing and validating such instruments should be prioritized to ensure accurate, age-appropriate outcome assessment and care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level III.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"1863-1873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ksa.12603\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ksa.12603\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ksa.12603","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lack of validated patient-reported outcome tools persists in paediatric and adolescent hip arthroscopy—A systematic review
Purpose
This systematic review aimed to (1) identify commonly used patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools in paediatric hip arthroscopy and (2) assess whether the PROs used in this population have been formally validated.
Methods
Two systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL, from inception to 31 March 2024 and 22 August 2024, respectively, followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The first search identified PRO instruments used in studies on hip arthroscopy in patients aged 19 and under. The second focused on the clinimetric properties of these tools in paediatric hip arthroscopy. PRO utilization was stratified by pathology, trends over time and publication type. Use of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments tool, and a descriptive analysis, were planned to assess the eligible clinimetric studies.
Results
Fifty-seven studies were included, identifying 10 hip-specific and 5 nonspecific PROs. The second search did not identify any clinimetric studies on these tools used in paediatric patients. The most commonly reported hip-specific PRO were the modified Hip Harris Score (n = 48), the Hip Outcome Score–Sport-Specific Subscale (n = 25) and the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (n = 20). Hip arthroscopy was used to treat over seven different conditions, with femoroacetabular impingement being the most common (n = 41, 77%). Between 2005 and 2024, the variety of hip-specific PROs increased, with seven new ones introduced by 2019–2024. Additionally, this study found a relatively equal distribution of outcomes across presentation abstracts and manuscripts.
Conclusions
The key finding of this study is the ongoing lack of hip-specific PRO tools in the paediatric hip arthroscopy literature, with reliance on adult-derived instruments. The absence of clinimetric studies and heterogeneity in PRO use emphasises the need for standardized, paediatric-specific tools. Developing and validating such instruments should be prioritized to ensure accurate, age-appropriate outcome assessment and care.
期刊介绍：
Few other areas of orthopedic surgery and traumatology have undergone such a dramatic evolution in the last 10 years as knee surgery, arthroscopy and sports traumatology. Ranked among the top 33% of journals in both Orthopedics and Sports Sciences, the goal of this European journal is to publish papers about innovative knee surgery, sports trauma surgery and arthroscopy. Each issue features a series of peer-reviewed articles that deal with diagnosis and management and with basic research. Each issue also contains at least one review article about an important clinical problem. Case presentations or short notes about technical innovations are also accepted for publication.
The articles cover all aspects of knee surgery and all types of sports trauma; in addition, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, and all types of arthroscopy (not only the knee but also the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, ankle, etc.) are addressed. Articles on new diagnostic techniques such as MRI and ultrasound and high-quality articles about the biomechanics of joints, muscles and tendons are included. Although this is largely a clinical journal, it is also open to basic research with clinical relevance.
Because the journal is supported by a distinguished European Editorial Board, assisted by an international Advisory Board, you can be assured that the journal maintains the highest standards.
Official Clinical Journal of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
