一种新的基于机器学习的乳腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌患者癌症特异性心血管疾病风险评分方法。

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Nickolas Stabellini, Omar M Makram, Harikrishnan Hyma Kunhiraman, Hisham Daoud, John Shanahan, Alberto J Montero, Roger S Blumenthal, Charu Aggarwal, Umang Swami, Salim S Virani, Vanita Noronha, Neeraj Agarwal, Susan Dent, Avirup Guha
{"title":"一种新的基于机器学习的乳腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌患者癌症特异性心血管疾病风险评分方法。","authors":"Nickolas Stabellini, Omar M Makram, Harikrishnan Hyma Kunhiraman, Hisham Daoud, John Shanahan, Alberto J Montero, Roger S Blumenthal, Charu Aggarwal, Umang Swami, Salim S Virani, Vanita Noronha, Neeraj Agarwal, Susan Dent, Avirup Guha","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer patients have up to a 3-fold higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than the general population. Traditional CVD risk scores may be less accurate for them. We aimed to develop cancer-specific CVD risk scores and compare them with conventional scores in predicting 10-year CVD risk for patients with breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), or lung cancer (LC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed adults diagnosed with BC, CRC, or LC between 2005 and 2012. An machine learning (ML) Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm ranked 40-50 covariates for predicting CVD for each cancer type using SHapley Additive exPlanations values. The top 10 ML-predictors were used to create predictive equations using logistic regression and compared with American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT), and Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation-2 (SCORE2) using the area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 10 339 patients: 55.5% had BC, 15.6% had CRC, and 29.7% had LC. The actual 10-year CVD rates were: BC 21%, CRC 10%, and LC 28%. The predictors derived from the ML algorithm included cancer-specific and socioeconomic factors. The cancer-specific predictive scores achieved AUCs of 0.84, 0.76, and 0.83 for BC, CRC, and LC, respectively, and outperformed PCE, PREVENT, and SCORE2, increasing the absolute AUC values by up to 0.31 points (with AUC ranging from 0 to 1). Similar results were found when excluding patients with cardiac history or advanced cancer from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cancer-specific CVD predictive scores outperform conventional scores and emphasize the importance of integrating cancer-related covariates for precise prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel machine learning-based cancer-specific cardiovascular disease risk score among patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Nickolas Stabellini, Omar M Makram, Harikrishnan Hyma Kunhiraman, Hisham Daoud, John Shanahan, Alberto J Montero, Roger S Blumenthal, Charu Aggarwal, Umang Swami, Salim S Virani, Vanita Noronha, Neeraj Agarwal, Susan Dent, Avirup Guha\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkaf016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer patients have up to a 3-fold higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than the general population. Traditional CVD risk scores may be less accurate for them. We aimed to develop cancer-specific CVD risk scores and compare them with conventional scores in predicting 10-year CVD risk for patients with breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), or lung cancer (LC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed adults diagnosed with BC, CRC, or LC between 2005 and 2012. An machine learning (ML) Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm ranked 40-50 covariates for predicting CVD for each cancer type using SHapley Additive exPlanations values. The top 10 ML-predictors were used to create predictive equations using logistic regression and compared with American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT), and Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation-2 (SCORE2) using the area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 10 339 patients: 55.5% had BC, 15.6% had CRC, and 29.7% had LC. The actual 10-year CVD rates were: BC 21%, CRC 10%, and LC 28%. The predictors derived from the ML algorithm included cancer-specific and socioeconomic factors. The cancer-specific predictive scores achieved AUCs of 0.84, 0.76, and 0.83 for BC, CRC, and LC, respectively, and outperformed PCE, PREVENT, and SCORE2, increasing the absolute AUC values by up to 0.31 points (with AUC ranging from 0 to 1). Similar results were found when excluding patients with cardiac history or advanced cancer from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cancer-specific CVD predictive scores outperform conventional scores and emphasize the importance of integrating cancer-related covariates for precise prediction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878632/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症患者患心血管疾病(CVD)的风险比一般人群高3倍。传统的心血管疾病风险评分对他们来说可能不太准确。我们的目的是建立癌症特异性CVD风险评分,并将其与传统评分在预测乳腺癌(BC)、结直肠癌(CRC)或肺癌(LC)患者10年CVD风险方面进行比较。方法:我们分析了2005-2012年间诊断为BC、CRC或LC的成年人。ML极端梯度增强(XGBoost)算法使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)值对40-50个协变量进行排序,用于预测每种癌症类型的心血管疾病。前10个ml预测因子使用逻辑回归建立预测方程,并与ACC/AHA合并队列方程(PCE)、预测心血管疾病事件风险(prevention)和使用曲线下面积(AUC)的系统性冠状动脉风险评估-2 (SCORE2)进行比较。结果:我们纳入了10,339例患者:55.5%患有BC, 15.6%患有CRC, 29.7%患有LC。实际的10年心血管疾病发生率为:BC 21%, CRC 10%, LC 28%。从ML算法得出的预测因子包括癌症特异性和社会经济因素。对于BC、CRC和LC,癌症特异性预测评分分别达到了0.84、0.76和0.83的AUC,并且优于PCE、PREVENT和SCORE2,将绝对AUC值提高了0.31分(AUC范围从0到1)。当从分析中排除有心脏病史或晚期癌症的患者时,也发现了类似的结果。癌症特异性CVD预测评分优于传统评分,并强调整合癌症相关协变量对精确预测的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel machine learning-based cancer-specific cardiovascular disease risk score among patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer.

Background: Cancer patients have up to a 3-fold higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than the general population. Traditional CVD risk scores may be less accurate for them. We aimed to develop cancer-specific CVD risk scores and compare them with conventional scores in predicting 10-year CVD risk for patients with breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), or lung cancer (LC).

Methods: We analyzed adults diagnosed with BC, CRC, or LC between 2005 and 2012. An machine learning (ML) Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm ranked 40-50 covariates for predicting CVD for each cancer type using SHapley Additive exPlanations values. The top 10 ML-predictors were used to create predictive equations using logistic regression and compared with American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT), and Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation-2 (SCORE2) using the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: We included 10 339 patients: 55.5% had BC, 15.6% had CRC, and 29.7% had LC. The actual 10-year CVD rates were: BC 21%, CRC 10%, and LC 28%. The predictors derived from the ML algorithm included cancer-specific and socioeconomic factors. The cancer-specific predictive scores achieved AUCs of 0.84, 0.76, and 0.83 for BC, CRC, and LC, respectively, and outperformed PCE, PREVENT, and SCORE2, increasing the absolute AUC values by up to 0.31 points (with AUC ranging from 0 to 1). Similar results were found when excluding patients with cardiac history or advanced cancer from the analysis.

Conclusions: Cancer-specific CVD predictive scores outperform conventional scores and emphasize the importance of integrating cancer-related covariates for precise prediction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信