一项比利时医师发起的试验,研究LifeStream外周支架移植系统用于治疗复杂的TASC C和D型髂病变。

Koen Deloose, Jan Gielis, Lieven Maene, Wouter Lansink, Philip Lerut, Jürgen Verbist, Koen Keirse, Peter Goverde, Sofie Vercauteren, Joren Callaert
{"title":"一项比利时医师发起的试验,研究LifeStream外周支架移植系统用于治疗复杂的TASC C和D型髂病变。","authors":"Koen Deloose, Jan Gielis, Lieven Maene, Wouter Lansink, Philip Lerut, Jürgen Verbist, Koen Keirse, Peter Goverde, Sofie Vercauteren, Joren Callaert","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13138-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the heterogeneity of literature findings, stent type selection for the endovascular treatment of complex aorto-iliac occlusive disease remains challenging. The BELSTREAM study, a physician-initiated, prospective, multicenter, single-arm study, aims to report the safety and efficacy of the balloon expandable LifeStream Peripheral Stent Graft System (BD, Tempe, Arizona, USA) for the treatment of complex TASC C and D aorto-iliac artery lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients and 133 lesions were included at six Belgian institutions. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is primary patency at 12 months' follow-up. The primary safety endpoint is freedom from periprocedural serious adverse events (SAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary patency rate at 12-month follow-up was 94.5%. Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) was reported in three patients at 12-month follow-up, resulting in a freedom from TLR rate of 95.3%. In a subgroup of patients with aorto-iliac stenting in kissing configuration, primary patency at 12-month follow-up was 97.4% with freedom from TLR 97.9%. Freedom from a negative primary safety outcome (NPSO) was 100% at 30 days in the overall study patient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patency and freedom from TLR rates, low adverse event rates, and up to one year sustained improvement in clinical outcomes demonstrate that the LifeStream™ Balloon Expandable Vascular Covered Stent is a well-suited device for the treatment of complex TASC C and D lesions, the challenging kissing configuration included.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"66 1","pages":"37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Belgian physician-initiated trial investigating the LifeStream peripheral stent graft system for the treatment of complex TASC C and D iliac lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Koen Deloose, Jan Gielis, Lieven Maene, Wouter Lansink, Philip Lerut, Jürgen Verbist, Koen Keirse, Peter Goverde, Sofie Vercauteren, Joren Callaert\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13138-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the heterogeneity of literature findings, stent type selection for the endovascular treatment of complex aorto-iliac occlusive disease remains challenging. The BELSTREAM study, a physician-initiated, prospective, multicenter, single-arm study, aims to report the safety and efficacy of the balloon expandable LifeStream Peripheral Stent Graft System (BD, Tempe, Arizona, USA) for the treatment of complex TASC C and D aorto-iliac artery lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients and 133 lesions were included at six Belgian institutions. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is primary patency at 12 months' follow-up. The primary safety endpoint is freedom from periprocedural serious adverse events (SAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary patency rate at 12-month follow-up was 94.5%. Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) was reported in three patients at 12-month follow-up, resulting in a freedom from TLR rate of 95.3%. In a subgroup of patients with aorto-iliac stenting in kissing configuration, primary patency at 12-month follow-up was 97.4% with freedom from TLR 97.9%. Freedom from a negative primary safety outcome (NPSO) was 100% at 30 days in the overall study patient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patency and freedom from TLR rates, low adverse event rates, and up to one year sustained improvement in clinical outcomes demonstrate that the LifeStream™ Balloon Expandable Vascular Covered Stent is a well-suited device for the treatment of complex TASC C and D lesions, the challenging kissing configuration included.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"37-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13138-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13138-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于文献研究结果的异质性,血管内治疗复杂主动脉-髂动脉闭塞性疾病的支架类型选择仍然具有挑战性。BELSTREAM研究是一项医生发起的前瞻性、多中心、单臂研究,旨在报告球囊可扩张LifeStream外周支架移植系统(BD, Tempe, Arizona, USA)治疗复杂TASC C和D型主动脉-髂动脉病变的安全性和有效性。方法:在比利时6所医院对70例患者和133个病变进行了研究。该研究的主要疗效终点是12个月随访时的原发性通畅。主要安全终点是无手术期间严重不良事件(sae)。结果:随访12个月原发性通畅率为94.5%。在12个月的随访中,有3例患者报告了靶区血管重建术(TLR), TLR的自由率为95.3%。在吻合型主动脉-髂支架植入术患者亚组中,12个月随访时原发性通畅率为97.4%,TLR解除率为97.9%。在整个研究患者群体中,30天无负性主要安全结局(NPSO)的发生率为100%。结论:通畅和无TLR率,低不良事件率,以及长达一年的临床结果持续改善表明,LifeStream™气球可膨胀血管覆盖支架是治疗复杂TASC C和D病变的理想设备,包括具有挑战性的吻合器结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Belgian physician-initiated trial investigating the LifeStream peripheral stent graft system for the treatment of complex TASC C and D iliac lesions.

Background: Due to the heterogeneity of literature findings, stent type selection for the endovascular treatment of complex aorto-iliac occlusive disease remains challenging. The BELSTREAM study, a physician-initiated, prospective, multicenter, single-arm study, aims to report the safety and efficacy of the balloon expandable LifeStream Peripheral Stent Graft System (BD, Tempe, Arizona, USA) for the treatment of complex TASC C and D aorto-iliac artery lesions.

Methods: Seventy patients and 133 lesions were included at six Belgian institutions. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is primary patency at 12 months' follow-up. The primary safety endpoint is freedom from periprocedural serious adverse events (SAEs).

Results: Primary patency rate at 12-month follow-up was 94.5%. Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) was reported in three patients at 12-month follow-up, resulting in a freedom from TLR rate of 95.3%. In a subgroup of patients with aorto-iliac stenting in kissing configuration, primary patency at 12-month follow-up was 97.4% with freedom from TLR 97.9%. Freedom from a negative primary safety outcome (NPSO) was 100% at 30 days in the overall study patient population.

Conclusions: The patency and freedom from TLR rates, low adverse event rates, and up to one year sustained improvement in clinical outcomes demonstrate that the LifeStream™ Balloon Expandable Vascular Covered Stent is a well-suited device for the treatment of complex TASC C and D lesions, the challenging kissing configuration included.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信