难民创伤后应激障碍短期强化治疗的可接受性和初步效果。

Petter Tinghög, Lina Vågbratt, Julia Jennstål, Maria Bragesjö, Niklas Möller
{"title":"难民创伤后应激障碍短期强化治疗的可接受性和初步效果。","authors":"Petter Tinghög, Lina Vågbratt, Julia Jennstål, Maria Bragesjö, Niklas Möller","doi":"10.7146/torture.v34i3.147953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a significant mental health concern in refugee populations exposed to trauma and displacement. Traditional treatments for PTSD often involve lengthy interventions. However, there's a growing interest in exploring more condensed, intensive treatments to improve outcomes and accessibility for refugees.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability, and preliminary effects of an intensive brief trauma-focused PTSD treatment (ITT) program delivered to refugees at the Swedish Red Cross Treatment Center for Persons Affected by War and Torture in Uppsala, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ten participants were enrolled in the study and received ITT over five consecutive weekdays comprising Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy (EMDR), prolonged exposure (PE), and physical activity (PA). Acceptability was assessed by analyzing journal notes, and clinicians' and patients' open-ended responses to sets of questions designed to elicit the patients' experiences and potential adverse events. Baseline and follow-up data regarding PTSD (i.e., PCL-5 and CAPS-5), disability (i.e., Whodas-12), and anxiety or depression (i.e., HSCL-25) were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated that ITT is an acceptable and viable treatment option for refugees with PTSD. No serious adverse events were reported, although some found the treatment very taxing. Overall, the ordeals were perceived as worthwhile. The statistical analyses showed substantial and significantly reduced PTSD symptoms, and anxiety levels i.e., CAPS-5 (Cohen's d 1,91; CI 95% 0.77-3.02), PCL-5 (Cohen's d 1,31; CI 95% 0.43 -2.15) Anxiety subscale of HSCL-25 (Cohen's d 1.47; CI 95% 0.49 -2.41). Reductions in depression symptoms and disability were also observed but were non-significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that this brief and massed treatment program for refugees with PTSD is a well-received and preliminary effective treatment option. Identifying less suitable candidates and conducting larger, controlled studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to establish ITT's efficacy in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":75230,"journal":{"name":"Torture : quarterly journal on rehabilitation of torture victims and prevention of torture","volume":"34 3","pages":"54-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability and Preliminary Effects of Intensive Brief Trauma-Focused PTSD Treatment for Refugees.\",\"authors\":\"Petter Tinghög, Lina Vågbratt, Julia Jennstål, Maria Bragesjö, Niklas Möller\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/torture.v34i3.147953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a significant mental health concern in refugee populations exposed to trauma and displacement. Traditional treatments for PTSD often involve lengthy interventions. However, there's a growing interest in exploring more condensed, intensive treatments to improve outcomes and accessibility for refugees.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability, and preliminary effects of an intensive brief trauma-focused PTSD treatment (ITT) program delivered to refugees at the Swedish Red Cross Treatment Center for Persons Affected by War and Torture in Uppsala, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ten participants were enrolled in the study and received ITT over five consecutive weekdays comprising Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy (EMDR), prolonged exposure (PE), and physical activity (PA). Acceptability was assessed by analyzing journal notes, and clinicians' and patients' open-ended responses to sets of questions designed to elicit the patients' experiences and potential adverse events. Baseline and follow-up data regarding PTSD (i.e., PCL-5 and CAPS-5), disability (i.e., Whodas-12), and anxiety or depression (i.e., HSCL-25) were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated that ITT is an acceptable and viable treatment option for refugees with PTSD. No serious adverse events were reported, although some found the treatment very taxing. Overall, the ordeals were perceived as worthwhile. The statistical analyses showed substantial and significantly reduced PTSD symptoms, and anxiety levels i.e., CAPS-5 (Cohen's d 1,91; CI 95% 0.77-3.02), PCL-5 (Cohen's d 1,31; CI 95% 0.43 -2.15) Anxiety subscale of HSCL-25 (Cohen's d 1.47; CI 95% 0.49 -2.41). Reductions in depression symptoms and disability were also observed but were non-significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that this brief and massed treatment program for refugees with PTSD is a well-received and preliminary effective treatment option. Identifying less suitable candidates and conducting larger, controlled studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to establish ITT's efficacy in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Torture : quarterly journal on rehabilitation of torture victims and prevention of torture\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"54-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Torture : quarterly journal on rehabilitation of torture victims and prevention of torture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v34i3.147953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Torture : quarterly journal on rehabilitation of torture victims and prevention of torture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v34i3.147953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是暴露于创伤和流离失所的难民人口中一个重要的心理健康问题。创伤后应激障碍的传统治疗通常需要冗长的干预。然而,人们越来越有兴趣探索更浓缩、更密集的治疗方法,以改善难民的治疗效果和可及性。目的:本研究旨在评估在瑞典乌普萨拉的瑞典红十字会受战争和酷刑影响者治疗中心为难民提供的以创伤后应激障碍为重点的强化短期创伤后应激障碍治疗(ITT)项目的可接受性和初步效果。方法:10名参与者在连续5个工作日内接受ITT治疗,包括眼动脱敏和再加工治疗(EMDR)、长时间暴露(PE)和身体活动(PA)。可接受性是通过分析期刊笔记,以及临床医生和患者对一系列问题的开放式回答来评估的,这些问题旨在引出患者的经历和潜在的不良事件。收集并分析PTSD(即PCL-5和CAPS-5)、残疾(即Whodas-12)和焦虑或抑郁(即HSCL-25)的基线和随访数据。结果:研究表明ITT是难民创伤后应激障碍可接受和可行的治疗方案。没有严重的不良事件报告,尽管有些人发现治疗非常费力。总的来说,这些考验被认为是值得的。统计分析显示,创伤后应激障碍症状和焦虑水平显著降低,即cap -5 (Cohen's d 1,91;CI 95% 0.77-3.02), PCL-5 (Cohen’s d 1,31;HSCL-25焦虑子量表(Cohen’s d 1.47;Ci 95% 0.49 -2.41)。抑郁症状和残疾也有所减少,但并不显著。结论:本研究结果提示,对难民创伤后应激障碍患者进行简短、集中的治疗方案是一种初步有效的治疗方案。需要确定不太合适的候选者,并进行更大规模的对照研究,随访时间更长,以确定ITT在这一人群中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability and Preliminary Effects of Intensive Brief Trauma-Focused PTSD Treatment for Refugees.

Background: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a significant mental health concern in refugee populations exposed to trauma and displacement. Traditional treatments for PTSD often involve lengthy interventions. However, there's a growing interest in exploring more condensed, intensive treatments to improve outcomes and accessibility for refugees.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability, and preliminary effects of an intensive brief trauma-focused PTSD treatment (ITT) program delivered to refugees at the Swedish Red Cross Treatment Center for Persons Affected by War and Torture in Uppsala, Sweden.

Method: Ten participants were enrolled in the study and received ITT over five consecutive weekdays comprising Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy (EMDR), prolonged exposure (PE), and physical activity (PA). Acceptability was assessed by analyzing journal notes, and clinicians' and patients' open-ended responses to sets of questions designed to elicit the patients' experiences and potential adverse events. Baseline and follow-up data regarding PTSD (i.e., PCL-5 and CAPS-5), disability (i.e., Whodas-12), and anxiety or depression (i.e., HSCL-25) were collected and analyzed.

Results: The study demonstrated that ITT is an acceptable and viable treatment option for refugees with PTSD. No serious adverse events were reported, although some found the treatment very taxing. Overall, the ordeals were perceived as worthwhile. The statistical analyses showed substantial and significantly reduced PTSD symptoms, and anxiety levels i.e., CAPS-5 (Cohen's d 1,91; CI 95% 0.77-3.02), PCL-5 (Cohen's d 1,31; CI 95% 0.43 -2.15) Anxiety subscale of HSCL-25 (Cohen's d 1.47; CI 95% 0.49 -2.41). Reductions in depression symptoms and disability were also observed but were non-significant.

Conclusions: The results suggest that this brief and massed treatment program for refugees with PTSD is a well-received and preliminary effective treatment option. Identifying less suitable candidates and conducting larger, controlled studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to establish ITT's efficacy in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信