Lu Yu Kuo, Zhong Li Titus Lim, Caitlin Letch, Joshua Silverman, Jason Jae Yeun Kim, Scott McClintock
{"title":"评估经尿道前列腺切除术中ha - bleeding-estimator工具的效用。","authors":"Lu Yu Kuo, Zhong Li Titus Lim, Caitlin Letch, Joshua Silverman, Jason Jae Yeun Kim, Scott McClintock","doi":"10.1002/bco2.480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding risk-estimation tool to predict for clinically significant postoperative haematuria in patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A single-centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients underwent TURP from April 2019 to December 2023 for treatment of symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia. The primary objective was to evaluate reliability of HAS-BLED score in predicting postoperative bleeding event. A focus sub-analysis was performed on anticoagulated patient cohort. Each patient was categorised in to HASBLED low-, moderate- and high-risk group according to the preestablished estimator tool. Patients' demographics, clinical, pathological and operative details were collected. Events of clinically significant haematuria within 3 months postoperatively were captured. Cohort characteristics and outcome were analysed with two-sided <i>t</i> test and ANOVA test. Further weight-adjusted multivariable analysis and ROC curve was performed to evaluate the predictive value of HAS-BLED score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our analysis showed that patients assigned as high-risk by HAS-BLED were at 2.17-times higher chance of developing clinically significant haematuria compared to the low-risk patients. The risk for high-risk patient was 18.5% (95%CI 11.7–25.3%) and 8.5% (95%CI 4.6–12.4%) for low-risk patients. Moderate-risk did not demonstrate any significant difference relative to the low-risk group. Sub-analysis of 113 patients receiving long-term anticoagulation accentuates the utility of the tool. The risk of haematuria for high-risk patient was 32.7% (95%CI 20.7–44.7%), moderate-risk patient was 28.7% (95%CI 17.0–40.3%), and low-risk patient was 9.7% (95%CI 4.2–15.2%). In this cohort, the risk of haematuria was 3.37 and 2.96 times higher in the high and moderate-risk compared to the low-risk group, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This is the first study to validate a bleeding estimator tool for TURP patients. High HAS-BLED score positively predicts clinically significant post-TURP haematuria, particularly for patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding-estimator tool for transurethral resection of prostate\",\"authors\":\"Lu Yu Kuo, Zhong Li Titus Lim, Caitlin Letch, Joshua Silverman, Jason Jae Yeun Kim, Scott McClintock\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding risk-estimation tool to predict for clinically significant postoperative haematuria in patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A single-centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients underwent TURP from April 2019 to December 2023 for treatment of symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia. The primary objective was to evaluate reliability of HAS-BLED score in predicting postoperative bleeding event. A focus sub-analysis was performed on anticoagulated patient cohort. Each patient was categorised in to HASBLED low-, moderate- and high-risk group according to the preestablished estimator tool. Patients' demographics, clinical, pathological and operative details were collected. Events of clinically significant haematuria within 3 months postoperatively were captured. Cohort characteristics and outcome were analysed with two-sided <i>t</i> test and ANOVA test. Further weight-adjusted multivariable analysis and ROC curve was performed to evaluate the predictive value of HAS-BLED score.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our analysis showed that patients assigned as high-risk by HAS-BLED were at 2.17-times higher chance of developing clinically significant haematuria compared to the low-risk patients. The risk for high-risk patient was 18.5% (95%CI 11.7–25.3%) and 8.5% (95%CI 4.6–12.4%) for low-risk patients. Moderate-risk did not demonstrate any significant difference relative to the low-risk group. Sub-analysis of 113 patients receiving long-term anticoagulation accentuates the utility of the tool. The risk of haematuria for high-risk patient was 32.7% (95%CI 20.7–44.7%), moderate-risk patient was 28.7% (95%CI 17.0–40.3%), and low-risk patient was 9.7% (95%CI 4.2–15.2%). In this cohort, the risk of haematuria was 3.37 and 2.96 times higher in the high and moderate-risk compared to the low-risk group, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is the first study to validate a bleeding estimator tool for TURP patients. High HAS-BLED score positively predicts clinically significant post-TURP haematuria, particularly for patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771491/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding-estimator tool for transurethral resection of prostate
Objectives
To evaluate the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding risk-estimation tool to predict for clinically significant postoperative haematuria in patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).
Patients and Methods
A single-centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients underwent TURP from April 2019 to December 2023 for treatment of symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia. The primary objective was to evaluate reliability of HAS-BLED score in predicting postoperative bleeding event. A focus sub-analysis was performed on anticoagulated patient cohort. Each patient was categorised in to HASBLED low-, moderate- and high-risk group according to the preestablished estimator tool. Patients' demographics, clinical, pathological and operative details were collected. Events of clinically significant haematuria within 3 months postoperatively were captured. Cohort characteristics and outcome were analysed with two-sided t test and ANOVA test. Further weight-adjusted multivariable analysis and ROC curve was performed to evaluate the predictive value of HAS-BLED score.
Results
Our analysis showed that patients assigned as high-risk by HAS-BLED were at 2.17-times higher chance of developing clinically significant haematuria compared to the low-risk patients. The risk for high-risk patient was 18.5% (95%CI 11.7–25.3%) and 8.5% (95%CI 4.6–12.4%) for low-risk patients. Moderate-risk did not demonstrate any significant difference relative to the low-risk group. Sub-analysis of 113 patients receiving long-term anticoagulation accentuates the utility of the tool. The risk of haematuria for high-risk patient was 32.7% (95%CI 20.7–44.7%), moderate-risk patient was 28.7% (95%CI 17.0–40.3%), and low-risk patient was 9.7% (95%CI 4.2–15.2%). In this cohort, the risk of haematuria was 3.37 and 2.96 times higher in the high and moderate-risk compared to the low-risk group, respectively.
Conclusion
This is the first study to validate a bleeding estimator tool for TURP patients. High HAS-BLED score positively predicts clinically significant post-TURP haematuria, particularly for patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.