膀胱流出梗阻是否混淆了快速诊断诊所用于评估前列腺癌风险的传统临床因素?

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1002/bco2.478
Thomas Philip Cahill, Samuel Joseph Withey, Steve Hazell, Declan Cahill, Netty Kinsella
{"title":"膀胱流出梗阻是否混淆了快速诊断诊所用于评估前列腺癌风险的传统临床因素?","authors":"Thomas Philip Cahill,&nbsp;Samuel Joseph Withey,&nbsp;Steve Hazell,&nbsp;Declan Cahill,&nbsp;Netty Kinsella","doi":"10.1002/bco2.478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To understand whether bladder outflow obstruction influences the association between traditional clinical predictive factors, particularly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). This will help facilitate effective and evidence-based triaging of patients in rapid-access clinics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data from 307 suspected prostate cancer patients who underwent diagnostic biopsy from 2019 to 2023 at a single, high-volume, specialist cancer centre. Uroflowmetry testing generated two cohorts: patients with bladder outflow obstruction and non-obstructed patients. The cohort characteristics between the groups were compared and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess associations between clinical predictive factors (age, PSA density, ethnicity, family history, digital rectal examination, urinary symptom severity and magnetic resonance imaging using the PI-RADS scoring system) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on biopsy (defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade of greater than or equal to two).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The obstructed group (<i>n</i> = 80) had significantly larger prostates and worse symptom severity (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between the other predictive factors or csPCa compared to the non-obstructed (<i>n</i> = 227) cohort. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed age, PSA density, an abnormal digital rectal examination and scoring PI-RADS 4–5 on magnetic resonance imaging were all significantly associated with csPCa in the non-obstructed cohort (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Contrastingly, only symptom severity and scoring PI-RADS 5 were significantly associated with csPCa for the obstructed patients (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In the presence of bladder outflow obstruction, traditional predictive variables such as age, PSA density, digital rectal examination and scoring PI-RADS 4 are not associated with csPCa. This study suggests that using these predictive variables to triage patients in rapid-access clinics with a patient who has bladder outflow obstruction could lead to the overuse of invasive biopsy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does bladder outflow obstruction obfuscate the traditional clinical factors that are used to assess the risk of prostate cancer at rapid-access diagnostic clinics?\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Philip Cahill,&nbsp;Samuel Joseph Withey,&nbsp;Steve Hazell,&nbsp;Declan Cahill,&nbsp;Netty Kinsella\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To understand whether bladder outflow obstruction influences the association between traditional clinical predictive factors, particularly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). This will help facilitate effective and evidence-based triaging of patients in rapid-access clinics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data from 307 suspected prostate cancer patients who underwent diagnostic biopsy from 2019 to 2023 at a single, high-volume, specialist cancer centre. Uroflowmetry testing generated two cohorts: patients with bladder outflow obstruction and non-obstructed patients. The cohort characteristics between the groups were compared and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess associations between clinical predictive factors (age, PSA density, ethnicity, family history, digital rectal examination, urinary symptom severity and magnetic resonance imaging using the PI-RADS scoring system) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on biopsy (defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade of greater than or equal to two).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The obstructed group (<i>n</i> = 80) had significantly larger prostates and worse symptom severity (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between the other predictive factors or csPCa compared to the non-obstructed (<i>n</i> = 227) cohort. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed age, PSA density, an abnormal digital rectal examination and scoring PI-RADS 4–5 on magnetic resonance imaging were all significantly associated with csPCa in the non-obstructed cohort (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Contrastingly, only symptom severity and scoring PI-RADS 5 were significantly associated with csPCa for the obstructed patients (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the presence of bladder outflow obstruction, traditional predictive variables such as age, PSA density, digital rectal examination and scoring PI-RADS 4 are not associated with csPCa. This study suggests that using these predictive variables to triage patients in rapid-access clinics with a patient who has bladder outflow obstruction could lead to the overuse of invasive biopsy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771501/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解膀胱流出梗阻是否影响传统临床预测因素,特别是前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度与临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的相关性。这将有助于在快速就诊诊所对患者进行有效的循证分诊。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了前瞻性收集的307例疑似前列腺癌患者的数据,这些患者于2019年至2023年在一个高容量的专科癌症中心接受了诊断性活检。尿流测定产生了两个队列:膀胱流出梗阻患者和非梗阻患者。比较各组之间的队列特征,并进行logistic回归分析,以评估临床预测因素(年龄、PSA密度、种族、家族史、直肠指检、泌尿症状严重程度和使用PI-RADS评分系统的磁共振成像)与活检临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)(定义为国际泌尿病理学会分级大于等于2级)之间的相关性。结果:梗阻组(n = 80)的前列腺明显增大,症状严重程度明显加重(p = 227)。多变量logistic回归分析显示,年龄、PSA密度、直肠指检异常、磁共振PI-RADS 4-5评分与非梗阻组csPCa均有显著相关性(p < 0.05)。结论:存在膀胱流出梗阻时,年龄、PSA密度、直肠指检、PI-RADS 4评分等传统预测变量与csPCa无相关性。这项研究表明,在快速就诊的诊所中,使用这些预测变量对患有膀胱流出梗阻的患者进行分诊可能会导致过度使用侵入性活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does bladder outflow obstruction obfuscate the traditional clinical factors that are used to assess the risk of prostate cancer at rapid-access diagnostic clinics?

Objectives

To understand whether bladder outflow obstruction influences the association between traditional clinical predictive factors, particularly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). This will help facilitate effective and evidence-based triaging of patients in rapid-access clinics.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data from 307 suspected prostate cancer patients who underwent diagnostic biopsy from 2019 to 2023 at a single, high-volume, specialist cancer centre. Uroflowmetry testing generated two cohorts: patients with bladder outflow obstruction and non-obstructed patients. The cohort characteristics between the groups were compared and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess associations between clinical predictive factors (age, PSA density, ethnicity, family history, digital rectal examination, urinary symptom severity and magnetic resonance imaging using the PI-RADS scoring system) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on biopsy (defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade of greater than or equal to two).

Results

The obstructed group (n = 80) had significantly larger prostates and worse symptom severity (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the other predictive factors or csPCa compared to the non-obstructed (n = 227) cohort. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed age, PSA density, an abnormal digital rectal examination and scoring PI-RADS 4–5 on magnetic resonance imaging were all significantly associated with csPCa in the non-obstructed cohort (p < 0.05). Contrastingly, only symptom severity and scoring PI-RADS 5 were significantly associated with csPCa for the obstructed patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

In the presence of bladder outflow obstruction, traditional predictive variables such as age, PSA density, digital rectal examination and scoring PI-RADS 4 are not associated with csPCa. This study suggests that using these predictive variables to triage patients in rapid-access clinics with a patient who has bladder outflow obstruction could lead to the overuse of invasive biopsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信