Charlson合并症指数(CCI)评分在预测临床诊断为COPD的门诊患者全因死亡率中的作用

Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26335565251315876
Kevin Ly, Dorothy Wakefield, Richard ZuWallack
{"title":"Charlson合并症指数(CCI)评分在预测临床诊断为COPD的门诊患者全因死亡率中的作用","authors":"Kevin Ly, Dorothy Wakefield, Richard ZuWallack","doi":"10.1177/26335565251315876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since comorbid conditions are frequently present in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and affect outcome, a composite scoring system to quantify comorbidity might be helpful in assessing mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested the hypothesis that the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score at the time of an outpatient medical clinic encounter for COPD predicts all-cause mortality. Cox Proportional Hazards analyses were used in 200 randomly selected patients to relate CCI scores to all-cause mortality out to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 62 ± 10 years, 56% were female, FEV1 was 62%, CCI was 3.08 ± 2.30, and 30% had a CCI ≥ 4, indicating 3 or more comorbid conditions. All-cause mortality was 8.5% and 20% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. In univariate testing, the CCI score and hospitalizations predicted mortality, but FEV1 did not. In multivariable testing, which included covariates of age, sex, socioeconomic status, race, FEV1 percent-predicted, and all-cause hospitalizations in the preceding year, CCI expressed as a continuous variable strongly predicted mortality: hazard ratio (HR) 1.38 for each unit increase in the score (p < 0.0001). While 1 or 2 comorbid conditions were not significantly related to mortality, 3 or more comorbid conditions (compared to none) strongly predicted mortality: HR 9.80, 95% CI 3.80 to 25.00.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comorbidity, assessed with the CCI, is strongly predictive of mortality in outpatients with a clinical diagnosis of COPD, and this relationship appears to be non-linear. This instrument may be useful in determining prognosis in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":73843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","volume":"15 ","pages":"26335565251315876"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The usefulness of Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scoring in predicting all-cause mortality in Outpatients with Clinical Diagnoses of COPD.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Ly, Dorothy Wakefield, Richard ZuWallack\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26335565251315876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since comorbid conditions are frequently present in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and affect outcome, a composite scoring system to quantify comorbidity might be helpful in assessing mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested the hypothesis that the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score at the time of an outpatient medical clinic encounter for COPD predicts all-cause mortality. Cox Proportional Hazards analyses were used in 200 randomly selected patients to relate CCI scores to all-cause mortality out to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 62 ± 10 years, 56% were female, FEV1 was 62%, CCI was 3.08 ± 2.30, and 30% had a CCI ≥ 4, indicating 3 or more comorbid conditions. All-cause mortality was 8.5% and 20% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. In univariate testing, the CCI score and hospitalizations predicted mortality, but FEV1 did not. In multivariable testing, which included covariates of age, sex, socioeconomic status, race, FEV1 percent-predicted, and all-cause hospitalizations in the preceding year, CCI expressed as a continuous variable strongly predicted mortality: hazard ratio (HR) 1.38 for each unit increase in the score (p < 0.0001). While 1 or 2 comorbid conditions were not significantly related to mortality, 3 or more comorbid conditions (compared to none) strongly predicted mortality: HR 9.80, 95% CI 3.80 to 25.00.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comorbidity, assessed with the CCI, is strongly predictive of mortality in outpatients with a clinical diagnosis of COPD, and this relationship appears to be non-linear. This instrument may be useful in determining prognosis in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"26335565251315876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773518/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251315876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251315876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中经常存在合并症并影响预后,因此量化合并症的综合评分系统可能有助于评估死亡风险。方法:我们检验了一个假设,即在门诊遇到慢性阻塞性肺病患者时,Charlson共病指数(CCI)评分可以预测全因死亡率。在200名随机选择的患者中使用Cox比例风险分析,将CCI评分与5年内的全因死亡率联系起来。结果:平均年龄62±10岁,56%为女性,FEV1为62%,CCI为3.08±2.30,30%的CCI≥4,表明3种及以上合并症。3年和5年的全因死亡率分别为8.5%和20%。在单变量检验中,CCI评分和住院次数预测死亡率,但FEV1不能预测死亡率。在包括年龄、性别、社会经济地位、种族、预测FEV1 %和前一年全因住院等协变量的多变量检验中,CCI作为一个连续变量表示强烈预测死亡率:每增加一个单位的风险比(HR)为1.38 (p < 0.0001)。1个或2个合并症与死亡率无显著相关性,3个或更多合并症(与无合并症相比)强烈预测死亡率:HR 9.80, 95% CI 3.80 ~ 25.00。结论:用CCI评估的合并症可以强烈预测临床诊断为COPD的门诊患者的死亡率,并且这种关系似乎是非线性的。该仪器可用于确定该人群的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The usefulness of Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scoring in predicting all-cause mortality in Outpatients with Clinical Diagnoses of COPD.

Background: Since comorbid conditions are frequently present in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and affect outcome, a composite scoring system to quantify comorbidity might be helpful in assessing mortality risk.

Methods: We tested the hypothesis that the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score at the time of an outpatient medical clinic encounter for COPD predicts all-cause mortality. Cox Proportional Hazards analyses were used in 200 randomly selected patients to relate CCI scores to all-cause mortality out to 5 years.

Results: Mean age was 62 ± 10 years, 56% were female, FEV1 was 62%, CCI was 3.08 ± 2.30, and 30% had a CCI ≥ 4, indicating 3 or more comorbid conditions. All-cause mortality was 8.5% and 20% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. In univariate testing, the CCI score and hospitalizations predicted mortality, but FEV1 did not. In multivariable testing, which included covariates of age, sex, socioeconomic status, race, FEV1 percent-predicted, and all-cause hospitalizations in the preceding year, CCI expressed as a continuous variable strongly predicted mortality: hazard ratio (HR) 1.38 for each unit increase in the score (p < 0.0001). While 1 or 2 comorbid conditions were not significantly related to mortality, 3 or more comorbid conditions (compared to none) strongly predicted mortality: HR 9.80, 95% CI 3.80 to 25.00.

Conclusion: Comorbidity, assessed with the CCI, is strongly predictive of mortality in outpatients with a clinical diagnosis of COPD, and this relationship appears to be non-linear. This instrument may be useful in determining prognosis in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信