Yvonne Jonk PhD, Heidi O'Connor MS, John Gale MS, Deborah Thayer MBA
{"title":"在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,农村卫生诊所和联邦合格卫生中心对医疗保险远程医疗的利用。","authors":"Yvonne Jonk PhD, Heidi O'Connor MS, John Gale MS, Deborah Thayer MBA","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To address the extent to which Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and independent and provider-based Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) were using telehealth prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries who used outpatient services at FQHCs and RHCs were identified within the 2019–2021 5% Medicare Limited Data Set Outpatient and Carrier files. Rural-Urban Continuum Codes were used to identify rural–urban clinic locations. Logistic regression included three-way interaction terms for time, rurality, and clinic type.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth use curbed the decline in outpatient visits for all clinic types during the pandemic. Telehealth use declined as the pandemic continued in 2021 yet remained higher than pre-pandemic levels. FQHCs had higher telehealth use (18%–31%) than RHCs (8%–14%) in 2020–2021. Across all years, tele-behavioral health was the primary venue for originating and distant site providers. Overall, 19%–34% of originating site providers were psychiatrists and 10%–31% were primary care providers. Likely due to patients sheltering-in-place (at home), 2020–2021 distant site providers were largely primary care providers. Urban FQHCs experienced the largest increase in telehealth use during the pandemic (24.6% increase in urban, 14.4%–15.8% in rural) followed by rural ID_RHCs (10.2%–11.7%). RHCs were less likely to provide telehealth services than FQHCs during the pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth played a key role in facilitating access to health services during the height of the pandemic (2020–2021). Telehealth flexibilities were associated with greater telehealth use among FQHCs and RHCs but did not make up for the overall decline in health service use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare telehealth utilization by Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified Health Centers prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Yvonne Jonk PhD, Heidi O'Connor MS, John Gale MS, Deborah Thayer MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To address the extent to which Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and independent and provider-based Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) were using telehealth prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries who used outpatient services at FQHCs and RHCs were identified within the 2019–2021 5% Medicare Limited Data Set Outpatient and Carrier files. Rural-Urban Continuum Codes were used to identify rural–urban clinic locations. Logistic regression included three-way interaction terms for time, rurality, and clinic type.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Telehealth use curbed the decline in outpatient visits for all clinic types during the pandemic. Telehealth use declined as the pandemic continued in 2021 yet remained higher than pre-pandemic levels. FQHCs had higher telehealth use (18%–31%) than RHCs (8%–14%) in 2020–2021. Across all years, tele-behavioral health was the primary venue for originating and distant site providers. Overall, 19%–34% of originating site providers were psychiatrists and 10%–31% were primary care providers. Likely due to patients sheltering-in-place (at home), 2020–2021 distant site providers were largely primary care providers. Urban FQHCs experienced the largest increase in telehealth use during the pandemic (24.6% increase in urban, 14.4%–15.8% in rural) followed by rural ID_RHCs (10.2%–11.7%). RHCs were less likely to provide telehealth services than FQHCs during the pandemic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Telehealth played a key role in facilitating access to health services during the height of the pandemic (2020–2021). Telehealth flexibilities were associated with greater telehealth use among FQHCs and RHCs but did not make up for the overall decline in health service use.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12920\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Medicare telehealth utilization by Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified Health Centers prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Purpose
To address the extent to which Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and independent and provider-based Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) were using telehealth prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
A nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries who used outpatient services at FQHCs and RHCs were identified within the 2019–2021 5% Medicare Limited Data Set Outpatient and Carrier files. Rural-Urban Continuum Codes were used to identify rural–urban clinic locations. Logistic regression included three-way interaction terms for time, rurality, and clinic type.
Findings
Telehealth use curbed the decline in outpatient visits for all clinic types during the pandemic. Telehealth use declined as the pandemic continued in 2021 yet remained higher than pre-pandemic levels. FQHCs had higher telehealth use (18%–31%) than RHCs (8%–14%) in 2020–2021. Across all years, tele-behavioral health was the primary venue for originating and distant site providers. Overall, 19%–34% of originating site providers were psychiatrists and 10%–31% were primary care providers. Likely due to patients sheltering-in-place (at home), 2020–2021 distant site providers were largely primary care providers. Urban FQHCs experienced the largest increase in telehealth use during the pandemic (24.6% increase in urban, 14.4%–15.8% in rural) followed by rural ID_RHCs (10.2%–11.7%). RHCs were less likely to provide telehealth services than FQHCs during the pandemic.
Conclusions
Telehealth played a key role in facilitating access to health services during the height of the pandemic (2020–2021). Telehealth flexibilities were associated with greater telehealth use among FQHCs and RHCs but did not make up for the overall decline in health service use.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.