保留引擎盖的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:一个外科医生的经验。

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1002/bco2.463
Keith R. S. Simpson, Jamie Krishnan, Linda Taylor, Alan McNeill, Daniel W. Good
{"title":"保留引擎盖的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:一个外科医生的经验。","authors":"Keith R. S. Simpson,&nbsp;Jamie Krishnan,&nbsp;Linda Taylor,&nbsp;Alan McNeill,&nbsp;Daniel W. Good","doi":"10.1002/bco2.463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the impact of anterior hood-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with posterior-anterior reconstruction in a single-surgeon series by analysing oncological and functional continence outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We carried out a cohort comparison study of a prospectively collected single-surgeon series. The surgeon was an ‘in-training’ fellowship trained surgeon in their first 2 years of independent practice. There were three cohorts identified from electronic and scanned paper operation notes. The first cohort of standard anterior RARP (no hood sparing) included initial patients and any patient in the consecutive series who had completed 3 month FU after RARP. The second cohort was hemi-hood-sparing RARP again within the consecutive database of patients and lastly full-hood-sparing RARP. Early continence was defined by patients reporting being ‘dry’ and with 0 pad or 1 confidence/security pad. Data was collected in an Excel spreadsheet, and SPSS was used to assess distribution with non-parametric data being analysed using a Mann Whitney <i>U</i> test and parametric data with an unpaired <i>t</i>-test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 174 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 who were operated on. Full pathology and 6-week follow-up pad use data was available for all patients. At 12 months, some data for EPIC-26 was not available (lack of response/clinic non-attendance). The results demonstrate doubling in early continence to over 75% at 6-week follow-up with comparable positive margin rates. This difference was statistically significantly better in the dorsal venous complex RARP sparing group in comparison to standard RARP (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Anterior hood-sparing RARP with anterior reconstruction is a modification to the standard anterior RARP approach with a short learning curve which provides patients with better early and late continence without compromise to oncological outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The learning curve for hood-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience\",\"authors\":\"Keith R. S. Simpson,&nbsp;Jamie Krishnan,&nbsp;Linda Taylor,&nbsp;Alan McNeill,&nbsp;Daniel W. Good\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to assess the impact of anterior hood-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with posterior-anterior reconstruction in a single-surgeon series by analysing oncological and functional continence outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We carried out a cohort comparison study of a prospectively collected single-surgeon series. The surgeon was an ‘in-training’ fellowship trained surgeon in their first 2 years of independent practice. There were three cohorts identified from electronic and scanned paper operation notes. The first cohort of standard anterior RARP (no hood sparing) included initial patients and any patient in the consecutive series who had completed 3 month FU after RARP. The second cohort was hemi-hood-sparing RARP again within the consecutive database of patients and lastly full-hood-sparing RARP. Early continence was defined by patients reporting being ‘dry’ and with 0 pad or 1 confidence/security pad. Data was collected in an Excel spreadsheet, and SPSS was used to assess distribution with non-parametric data being analysed using a Mann Whitney <i>U</i> test and parametric data with an unpaired <i>t</i>-test.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified 174 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 who were operated on. Full pathology and 6-week follow-up pad use data was available for all patients. At 12 months, some data for EPIC-26 was not available (lack of response/clinic non-attendance). The results demonstrate doubling in early continence to over 75% at 6-week follow-up with comparable positive margin rates. This difference was statistically significantly better in the dorsal venous complex RARP sparing group in comparison to standard RARP (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Anterior hood-sparing RARP with anterior reconstruction is a modification to the standard anterior RARP approach with a short learning curve which provides patients with better early and late continence without compromise to oncological outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过分析肿瘤和功能失禁的结果,评估单外科手术系列中前路保留帽机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)与后路重建的影响。患者和方法:我们对前瞻性收集的单外科医生系列进行了队列比较研究。该外科医生是一名接受过两年独立执业培训的“在职”外科医生。从电子和扫描的纸质手术记录中确定了三个队列。第一组标准前路RARP(不保留hood)包括初始患者和连续系列中任何在RARP后完成3个月FU的患者。第二组在连续的患者数据库中再次进行半保留RARP,最后进行全保留RARP。早期尿失禁的定义是患者报告“干燥”,并使用0或1个信心/安全垫。数据收集在Excel电子表格中,使用SPSS评估分布,使用Mann Whitney U检验分析非参数数据,使用非配对t检验分析参数数据。结果:我们从2020年3月至2022年2月确定了174例手术患者。所有患者均可获得完整病理和6周随访垫使用数据。在12个月时,EPIC-26的一些数据不可用(缺乏反应/诊所无出勤)。结果显示,在6周的随访中,早期尿失禁率翻了一番,达到75%以上。与标准RARP相比,保留背静脉复体RARP组的差异具有统计学意义(p)。结论:保留前帽RARP联合前路重建是对标准前路RARP入路的改进,具有较短的学习曲线,可为患者提供更好的早期和晚期尿失禁,且不影响肿瘤预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The learning curve for hood-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the impact of anterior hood-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with posterior-anterior reconstruction in a single-surgeon series by analysing oncological and functional continence outcomes.

Patients and Methods

We carried out a cohort comparison study of a prospectively collected single-surgeon series. The surgeon was an ‘in-training’ fellowship trained surgeon in their first 2 years of independent practice. There were three cohorts identified from electronic and scanned paper operation notes. The first cohort of standard anterior RARP (no hood sparing) included initial patients and any patient in the consecutive series who had completed 3 month FU after RARP. The second cohort was hemi-hood-sparing RARP again within the consecutive database of patients and lastly full-hood-sparing RARP. Early continence was defined by patients reporting being ‘dry’ and with 0 pad or 1 confidence/security pad. Data was collected in an Excel spreadsheet, and SPSS was used to assess distribution with non-parametric data being analysed using a Mann Whitney U test and parametric data with an unpaired t-test.

Results

We identified 174 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 who were operated on. Full pathology and 6-week follow-up pad use data was available for all patients. At 12 months, some data for EPIC-26 was not available (lack of response/clinic non-attendance). The results demonstrate doubling in early continence to over 75% at 6-week follow-up with comparable positive margin rates. This difference was statistically significantly better in the dorsal venous complex RARP sparing group in comparison to standard RARP (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Anterior hood-sparing RARP with anterior reconstruction is a modification to the standard anterior RARP approach with a short learning curve which provides patients with better early and late continence without compromise to oncological outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信