替莫唑胺单药治疗与黑色素瘤联合治疗:疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Melanoma Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1097/CMR.0000000000001021
Lu Chen, Beichen Cai, Xuejun Ni, Qian Lin, Ruonan Ke, Xiaofen Wan, Tao Huang, Xiuying Shan, Biao Wang
{"title":"替莫唑胺单药治疗与黑色素瘤联合治疗:疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。","authors":"Lu Chen, Beichen Cai, Xuejun Ni, Qian Lin, Ruonan Ke, Xiaofen Wan, Tao Huang, Xiuying Shan, Biao Wang","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000001021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Temozolomide is used in melanoma therapy, but the comparative efficacy and safety of monotherapy vs combination therapies are unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates temozolomide monotherapy vs combination therapies in melanoma patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to August 2024 for studies comparing temozolomide monotherapy with combination therapies in melanoma. Primary outcomes were 1-year survival and objective response rates (RR); secondary outcomes included hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. Data were pooled using risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seven studies were included. Combination therapies improved objective RR over temozolomide monotherapy (risk ratio 0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.88). One-year survival did not differ significantly between groups (risk ratio 0.81, 95% CI: 0.59-1.12). Temozolomide monotherapy was associated with reduced incidence of leukopenia (risk ratio 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30-0.95). Adding interferon-alpha (IFN-α) to temozolomide significantly improved 1-year survival (risk ratio 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.84) and objective RR (risk ratio 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.78) compared to temozolomide alone, without significantly increasing toxicity. Combination therapies enhance objective RR over temozolomide monotherapy, with similar 1-year survival. Temozolomide monotherapy offers a better hematologic safety profile. Combining temozolomide with IFN-α significantly improves survival and RR without increasing toxicity. Clinicians should balance efficacy and safety when choosing melanoma treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":" ","pages":"87-101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temozolomide monotherapy versus combination therapies in melanoma: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.\",\"authors\":\"Lu Chen, Beichen Cai, Xuejun Ni, Qian Lin, Ruonan Ke, Xiaofen Wan, Tao Huang, Xiuying Shan, Biao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CMR.0000000000001021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Temozolomide is used in melanoma therapy, but the comparative efficacy and safety of monotherapy vs combination therapies are unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates temozolomide monotherapy vs combination therapies in melanoma patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to August 2024 for studies comparing temozolomide monotherapy with combination therapies in melanoma. Primary outcomes were 1-year survival and objective response rates (RR); secondary outcomes included hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. Data were pooled using risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seven studies were included. Combination therapies improved objective RR over temozolomide monotherapy (risk ratio 0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.88). One-year survival did not differ significantly between groups (risk ratio 0.81, 95% CI: 0.59-1.12). Temozolomide monotherapy was associated with reduced incidence of leukopenia (risk ratio 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30-0.95). Adding interferon-alpha (IFN-α) to temozolomide significantly improved 1-year survival (risk ratio 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.84) and objective RR (risk ratio 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.78) compared to temozolomide alone, without significantly increasing toxicity. Combination therapies enhance objective RR over temozolomide monotherapy, with similar 1-year survival. Temozolomide monotherapy offers a better hematologic safety profile. Combining temozolomide with IFN-α significantly improves survival and RR without increasing toxicity. Clinicians should balance efficacy and safety when choosing melanoma treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melanoma Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"87-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melanoma Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000001021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melanoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000001021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

替莫唑胺用于黑色素瘤治疗,但单一治疗与联合治疗的比较疗效和安全性尚不清楚。这项荟萃分析评估了替莫唑胺单药治疗与黑色素瘤患者的联合治疗。PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆检索了截至2024年8月的替莫唑胺单药与联合治疗黑色素瘤的比较研究。主要结局是1年生存率和客观缓解率(RR);次要结果包括血液学和非血液学毒性。使用95%置信区间(ci)的风险比合并数据。纳入了7项研究。联合治疗比替莫唑胺单药治疗改善了客观RR(风险比0.68,95% CI: 0.53-0.88)。两组间一年生存率无显著差异(风险比0.81,95% CI: 0.59-1.12)。替莫唑胺单药治疗与白细胞减少发生率降低相关(风险比0.54,95% CI: 0.30-0.95)。与单用替莫唑胺相比,替莫唑胺中添加干扰素-α (IFN-α)可显著提高1年生存率(风险比0.54,95% CI: 0.35-0.84)和客观RR(风险比0.57,95% CI: 0.42-0.78),且未显著增加毒性。与替莫唑胺单药治疗相比,联合治疗可提高客观RR, 1年生存率相似。替莫唑胺单药治疗具有更好的血液学安全性。替莫唑胺与IFN-α联用可显著提高生存率和RR,且不增加毒性。临床医生在选择黑色素瘤治疗方法时应平衡疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temozolomide monotherapy versus combination therapies in melanoma: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.

Temozolomide is used in melanoma therapy, but the comparative efficacy and safety of monotherapy vs combination therapies are unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates temozolomide monotherapy vs combination therapies in melanoma patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to August 2024 for studies comparing temozolomide monotherapy with combination therapies in melanoma. Primary outcomes were 1-year survival and objective response rates (RR); secondary outcomes included hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. Data were pooled using risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seven studies were included. Combination therapies improved objective RR over temozolomide monotherapy (risk ratio 0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.88). One-year survival did not differ significantly between groups (risk ratio 0.81, 95% CI: 0.59-1.12). Temozolomide monotherapy was associated with reduced incidence of leukopenia (risk ratio 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30-0.95). Adding interferon-alpha (IFN-α) to temozolomide significantly improved 1-year survival (risk ratio 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.84) and objective RR (risk ratio 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.78) compared to temozolomide alone, without significantly increasing toxicity. Combination therapies enhance objective RR over temozolomide monotherapy, with similar 1-year survival. Temozolomide monotherapy offers a better hematologic safety profile. Combining temozolomide with IFN-α significantly improves survival and RR without increasing toxicity. Clinicians should balance efficacy and safety when choosing melanoma treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Melanoma Research
Melanoma Research 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Melanoma Research is a well established international forum for the dissemination of new findings relating to melanoma. The aim of the Journal is to promote the level of informational exchange between those engaged in the field. Melanoma Research aims to encourage an informed and balanced view of experimental and clinical research and extend and stimulate communication and exchange of knowledge between investigators with differing areas of expertise. This will foster the development of translational research. The reporting of new clinical results and the effect and toxicity of new therapeutic agents and immunotherapy will be given emphasis by rapid publication of Short Communications. ​Thus, Melanoma Research seeks to present a coherent and up-to-date account of all aspects of investigations pertinent to melanoma. Consequently the scope of the Journal is broad, embracing the entire range of studies from fundamental and applied research in such subject areas as genetics, molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, photobiology, pathology, immunology, and advances in clinical oncology influencing the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of melanoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信