Sonya Bhaskar, Zachary Makovich, Rahul Mhaskar, Emily Coughlin, Jennifer Seminerio-Diehl
{"title":"探索双靶向治疗在中重度炎症性肠病的管理:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Sonya Bhaskar, Zachary Makovich, Rahul Mhaskar, Emily Coughlin, Jennifer Seminerio-Diehl","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otae057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), often results in significant morbidity among patients with moderate to severe forms. While biologics and small molecules are effective in inducing remission, many patients experience refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of dual-targeted therapy in IBD patients treated at the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined 79 patients with UC or CD who received dual-targeted therapy at the University from October 2018 to August 2023. Data collected included demographics, disease characteristics, previous treatments, and clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes were endoscopic, radiographic, and patient-reported clinical improvements, with secondary outcomes focusing on safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 79 patients (42 UC, 37 CD), 97 dual-targeted therapy cases were analyzed, primarily involving a biologic combined with a JAK inhibitor (90.7%). The median therapy duration was 39.1 weeks. Endoscopic improvement occurred in 69% of matched samples, with significant differences between pre- and postdual-targeted therapy Mayo scores for UC (<i>P</i> = .002) and Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) scores for CD (<i>P</i> = .018). The median pre- and postdual-targeted therapy Mayo scores across matched samples were 3 (range 1-3) and 1 (range 0-3), respectively, and for SES-CD scores were 12 (range 0-36) and 4 (range 0-20), respectively. Clinical improvement was reported by 73.2% of patients, with notable reductions in ESR (median 19 [range 2-124] mm/h to 9 [range 0-116] mm/h, <i>P</i> = .006), CRP (median 8.0 [range 0.2-78.5] mg/L to 3.0 [range 0.2-68.2] mg/L, <i>P</i> < .001), and albumin levels (4.0 [range 2.2-4.9] mg/dL to 4.2 [range 3.4-5.2], <i>P</i> < .001). Non-obesity was associated with both more endoscopic improvement (<i>P</i> = .002) and clinical improvement (<i>P</i> = .007). Adverse events occurred in 37 cases, predominantly upper respiratory tract infections and dermatologic issues, with no thromboembolic events reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual-targeted therapy demonstrated efficacy in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients with severe, refractory IBD and exhibited an acceptable safety profile. Despite the promising results, further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine optimal therapy combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"7 1","pages":"otae057"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Dual-Targeted Therapy in the Management of Moderate to Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sonya Bhaskar, Zachary Makovich, Rahul Mhaskar, Emily Coughlin, Jennifer Seminerio-Diehl\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otae057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), often results in significant morbidity among patients with moderate to severe forms. While biologics and small molecules are effective in inducing remission, many patients experience refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of dual-targeted therapy in IBD patients treated at the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined 79 patients with UC or CD who received dual-targeted therapy at the University from October 2018 to August 2023. Data collected included demographics, disease characteristics, previous treatments, and clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes were endoscopic, radiographic, and patient-reported clinical improvements, with secondary outcomes focusing on safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 79 patients (42 UC, 37 CD), 97 dual-targeted therapy cases were analyzed, primarily involving a biologic combined with a JAK inhibitor (90.7%). The median therapy duration was 39.1 weeks. Endoscopic improvement occurred in 69% of matched samples, with significant differences between pre- and postdual-targeted therapy Mayo scores for UC (<i>P</i> = .002) and Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) scores for CD (<i>P</i> = .018). The median pre- and postdual-targeted therapy Mayo scores across matched samples were 3 (range 1-3) and 1 (range 0-3), respectively, and for SES-CD scores were 12 (range 0-36) and 4 (range 0-20), respectively. Clinical improvement was reported by 73.2% of patients, with notable reductions in ESR (median 19 [range 2-124] mm/h to 9 [range 0-116] mm/h, <i>P</i> = .006), CRP (median 8.0 [range 0.2-78.5] mg/L to 3.0 [range 0.2-68.2] mg/L, <i>P</i> < .001), and albumin levels (4.0 [range 2.2-4.9] mg/dL to 4.2 [range 3.4-5.2], <i>P</i> < .001). Non-obesity was associated with both more endoscopic improvement (<i>P</i> = .002) and clinical improvement (<i>P</i> = .007). Adverse events occurred in 37 cases, predominantly upper respiratory tract infections and dermatologic issues, with no thromboembolic events reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual-targeted therapy demonstrated efficacy in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients with severe, refractory IBD and exhibited an acceptable safety profile. Despite the promising results, further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine optimal therapy combinations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"otae057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772558/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:炎症性肠病(IBD),包括溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD),通常在中度至重度的患者中导致显著的发病率。虽然生物制剂和小分子在诱导缓解方面是有效的,但许多患者会出现难治性疾病或肠外症状。本研究评估了双靶向治疗在炎症性肠病中心治疗的IBD患者的安全性和有效性。方法:这项回顾性队列研究调查了2018年10月至2023年8月在该大学接受双靶向治疗的79例UC或CD患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学、疾病特征、既往治疗和临床结果。主要结果是内窥镜、放射学和患者报告的临床改善,次要结果是安全性。结果:在79例患者(42例UC, 37例CD)中,分析了97例双靶向治疗,主要是生物制剂联合JAK抑制剂(90.7%)。中位治疗时间为39.1周。内镜下改善发生在69%的匹配样本中,双靶向治疗前后UC的Mayo评分(P = 0.002)和CD的简单内镜评分(SES-CD)评分(P = 0.018)之间存在显著差异。配对样本的双靶向治疗前后Mayo评分中位数分别为3(范围1-3)和1(范围0-3),SES-CD评分中位数分别为12(范围0-36)和4(范围0-20)。73.2%的患者报告了临床改善,ESR(中位数19[范围2-124]mm/h至9[范围0-116]mm/h, P = 0.006)、CRP(中位数8.0[范围0.2-78.5]mg/L至3.0[范围0.2-68.2]mg/L, P P = 0.002)和临床改善(P = 0.007)显著降低。37例发生不良事件,主要是上呼吸道感染和皮肤问题,无血栓栓塞事件报道。结论:双靶向治疗在改善严重难治性IBD患者的临床和内镜预后方面显示出疗效,并表现出可接受的安全性。尽管结果令人鼓舞,但需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现并确定最佳的治疗组合。
Exploring Dual-Targeted Therapy in the Management of Moderate to Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study.
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), often results in significant morbidity among patients with moderate to severe forms. While biologics and small molecules are effective in inducing remission, many patients experience refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of dual-targeted therapy in IBD patients treated at the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined 79 patients with UC or CD who received dual-targeted therapy at the University from October 2018 to August 2023. Data collected included demographics, disease characteristics, previous treatments, and clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes were endoscopic, radiographic, and patient-reported clinical improvements, with secondary outcomes focusing on safety profiles.
Results: Among the 79 patients (42 UC, 37 CD), 97 dual-targeted therapy cases were analyzed, primarily involving a biologic combined with a JAK inhibitor (90.7%). The median therapy duration was 39.1 weeks. Endoscopic improvement occurred in 69% of matched samples, with significant differences between pre- and postdual-targeted therapy Mayo scores for UC (P = .002) and Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) scores for CD (P = .018). The median pre- and postdual-targeted therapy Mayo scores across matched samples were 3 (range 1-3) and 1 (range 0-3), respectively, and for SES-CD scores were 12 (range 0-36) and 4 (range 0-20), respectively. Clinical improvement was reported by 73.2% of patients, with notable reductions in ESR (median 19 [range 2-124] mm/h to 9 [range 0-116] mm/h, P = .006), CRP (median 8.0 [range 0.2-78.5] mg/L to 3.0 [range 0.2-68.2] mg/L, P < .001), and albumin levels (4.0 [range 2.2-4.9] mg/dL to 4.2 [range 3.4-5.2], P < .001). Non-obesity was associated with both more endoscopic improvement (P = .002) and clinical improvement (P = .007). Adverse events occurred in 37 cases, predominantly upper respiratory tract infections and dermatologic issues, with no thromboembolic events reported.
Conclusions: Dual-targeted therapy demonstrated efficacy in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients with severe, refractory IBD and exhibited an acceptable safety profile. Despite the promising results, further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine optimal therapy combinations.