{"title":"经膝下腘动脉取栓治疗急性肢体缺血的疗效观察。","authors":"Kentaro Kasa, Takao Ohki, Kota Shukuzawa, Soichiro Fukushima, Hirotsugu Ozawa, Makiko Omori, Yoshihiko Chono, Hiromasa Tachihara","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Surgical thrombectomy has been established as an effective treatment for acute limb ischemia (ALI). Nevertheless, manipulation via the common femoral artery (CFA) to retrieve thrombus in the infra-popliteal artery sometimes proves less effective. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing surgical thrombectomy for infra-inguinal ALI from January 2010 to December 2022. The primary endpoint was the rate of amputation. Secondary endpoints were technical and clinical success rates, incidence of distal embolism, and freedom from reintervention. <b>Results:</b> A total of 35 patients underwent surgical thrombectomy where the popliteal artery or below is occluded. The CFA approach was utilized in 13, and the below-knee popliteal artery (BKPA) approach in 22. There were no differences in background between groups. The reintervention rate was lower in the BKPA group (BKPA group: 0% vs. CFA group: 30.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.01). The BKPA group showed a significantly lower incidence of distal embolism (BKPA group: 4.5% vs. CFA group: 38.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.02) and freedom from reintervention (BKPA group 100% at 12 months vs. CFA group: 68.7% at 12 months; log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> The BKPA approach-first strategy for surgical thrombectomy in the management of ALI is feasible with better outcomes compared with the CFA approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Surgical Thrombectomy via Below-Knee Popliteal Artery for the Treatment of Acute Limb Ischemia.\",\"authors\":\"Kentaro Kasa, Takao Ohki, Kota Shukuzawa, Soichiro Fukushima, Hirotsugu Ozawa, Makiko Omori, Yoshihiko Chono, Hiromasa Tachihara\",\"doi\":\"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Surgical thrombectomy has been established as an effective treatment for acute limb ischemia (ALI). Nevertheless, manipulation via the common femoral artery (CFA) to retrieve thrombus in the infra-popliteal artery sometimes proves less effective. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing surgical thrombectomy for infra-inguinal ALI from January 2010 to December 2022. The primary endpoint was the rate of amputation. Secondary endpoints were technical and clinical success rates, incidence of distal embolism, and freedom from reintervention. <b>Results:</b> A total of 35 patients underwent surgical thrombectomy where the popliteal artery or below is occluded. The CFA approach was utilized in 13, and the below-knee popliteal artery (BKPA) approach in 22. There were no differences in background between groups. The reintervention rate was lower in the BKPA group (BKPA group: 0% vs. CFA group: 30.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.01). The BKPA group showed a significantly lower incidence of distal embolism (BKPA group: 4.5% vs. CFA group: 38.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.02) and freedom from reintervention (BKPA group 100% at 12 months vs. CFA group: 68.7% at 12 months; log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> The BKPA approach-first strategy for surgical thrombectomy in the management of ALI is feasible with better outcomes compared with the CFA approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular diseases\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774520/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:手术取栓是治疗急性肢体缺血(ALI)的有效方法。然而,经股总动脉(CFA)取出腘下动脉血栓有时被证明效果较差。方法:我们回顾性分析了2010年1月至2022年12月因腹股沟下ALI接受手术取栓的患者。主要终点是截肢率。次要终点是技术和临床成功率、远端栓塞发生率和再次干预的自由度。结果:35例患者在腘动脉及以下闭塞处行手术取栓术。13例采用CFA入路,22例采用膝下腘动脉(BKPA)入路。两组之间的背景没有差异。BKPA组的再干预率较低(BKPA组:0% vs. CFA组:30.8%;P = 0.01)。BKPA组远端栓塞发生率明显低于CFA组(BKPA组:4.5% vs. CFA组:38.5%;P = 0.02)和再干预自由度(BKPA组12个月时为100%,CFA组12个月时为68.7%;log-rank P = 0.01)。结论:与CFA入路相比,BKPA入路优先策略在ALI手术取栓治疗中是可行的,效果更好。
The Effectiveness of Surgical Thrombectomy via Below-Knee Popliteal Artery for the Treatment of Acute Limb Ischemia.
Objectives: Surgical thrombectomy has been established as an effective treatment for acute limb ischemia (ALI). Nevertheless, manipulation via the common femoral artery (CFA) to retrieve thrombus in the infra-popliteal artery sometimes proves less effective. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing surgical thrombectomy for infra-inguinal ALI from January 2010 to December 2022. The primary endpoint was the rate of amputation. Secondary endpoints were technical and clinical success rates, incidence of distal embolism, and freedom from reintervention. Results: A total of 35 patients underwent surgical thrombectomy where the popliteal artery or below is occluded. The CFA approach was utilized in 13, and the below-knee popliteal artery (BKPA) approach in 22. There were no differences in background between groups. The reintervention rate was lower in the BKPA group (BKPA group: 0% vs. CFA group: 30.8%; P = 0.01). The BKPA group showed a significantly lower incidence of distal embolism (BKPA group: 4.5% vs. CFA group: 38.5%; P = 0.02) and freedom from reintervention (BKPA group 100% at 12 months vs. CFA group: 68.7% at 12 months; log-rank P = 0.01). Conclusions: The BKPA approach-first strategy for surgical thrombectomy in the management of ALI is feasible with better outcomes compared with the CFA approach.