GGS经椎弓根稳定中后续螺杆运动节点摩擦磨损的评价。

IF 0.8
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-01-27 Print Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.37190/abb-02517-2024-02
Justyna Lichosik, Klaudia Szkoda-Poliszuk, Małgorzata Żak, Celina Pezowicz
{"title":"GGS经椎弓根稳定中后续螺杆运动节点摩擦磨损的评价。","authors":"Justyna Lichosik, Klaudia Szkoda-Poliszuk, Małgorzata Żak, Celina Pezowicz","doi":"10.37190/abb-02517-2024-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: The aim of this study was to evaluate the abrasive wear of the sliding screw-rod joint used in growth guidance system (GGS) stabilizers, allowing for the translation of the screw along the rod during the spinal growth process in a standard and modified system. <i>Methods</i>: The study used single kinematic screw-rod pairs made of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Mechanical tests (cyclic loads) simulated the stabilizer's operation under conditions similar to actual use. A microscopic evaluation was conducted, analyzing abrasive wear based on measured abrasion areas. Numerical simulations were performed for the standard joint system and for a structural change (an additional insert to increase contact area between the rod and sliding screw cap). <i>Results</i>: The study evaluated the abrasive wear of the mating elements of the stabilizer. Mechanical tests showed an increase in the force observed (11.74 ± 2.52 N) with the increasing number of load cycles. Microscopic evaluation showed abrasion of the caps and rods in two areas (upper and lower). Numerical simulations indicated the highest stresses in the standard system were on the mating elements, i.e., the rod and the cap (15.6 MPa). In the modified joint, stress distribution differed, concentrating on the surface of the insert and the rod, with maximum values of 6.0 MPa (PE insert) and 12.4 MPa (PEEK insert). <i>Conclusions</i>: Comparing the stress distributions obtained in the numerical simulations and the abrasive wear effects produced in the mechanical tests, a similar mechanism was observed (the destruction of the top layer of the mating elements of the stabilizer).</p>","PeriodicalId":519996,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"26 3","pages":"135-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of frictional wear in a follow-up screw-rod kinematic node in GGS transpedicular stabilization.\",\"authors\":\"Justyna Lichosik, Klaudia Szkoda-Poliszuk, Małgorzata Żak, Celina Pezowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.37190/abb-02517-2024-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: The aim of this study was to evaluate the abrasive wear of the sliding screw-rod joint used in growth guidance system (GGS) stabilizers, allowing for the translation of the screw along the rod during the spinal growth process in a standard and modified system. <i>Methods</i>: The study used single kinematic screw-rod pairs made of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Mechanical tests (cyclic loads) simulated the stabilizer's operation under conditions similar to actual use. A microscopic evaluation was conducted, analyzing abrasive wear based on measured abrasion areas. Numerical simulations were performed for the standard joint system and for a structural change (an additional insert to increase contact area between the rod and sliding screw cap). <i>Results</i>: The study evaluated the abrasive wear of the mating elements of the stabilizer. Mechanical tests showed an increase in the force observed (11.74 ± 2.52 N) with the increasing number of load cycles. Microscopic evaluation showed abrasion of the caps and rods in two areas (upper and lower). Numerical simulations indicated the highest stresses in the standard system were on the mating elements, i.e., the rod and the cap (15.6 MPa). In the modified joint, stress distribution differed, concentrating on the surface of the insert and the rod, with maximum values of 6.0 MPa (PE insert) and 12.4 MPa (PEEK insert). <i>Conclusions</i>: Comparing the stress distributions obtained in the numerical simulations and the abrasive wear effects produced in the mechanical tests, a similar mechanism was observed (the destruction of the top layer of the mating elements of the stabilizer).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"135-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02517-2024-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02517-2024-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估用于生长引导系统(GGS)稳定器的滑动螺钉-杆关节的磨料磨损,在标准和改进的系统中,在脊柱生长过程中允许螺钉沿杆移动。方法:采用Ti6Al4V钛合金制作的单运动螺杆副进行研究。机械试验(循环载荷)模拟稳定器在类似实际使用条件下的运行情况。通过测量磨粒磨损面积,对磨粒磨损进行微观评价。对标准连接系统和结构变化(增加杆与滑动螺帽之间的接触面积)进行了数值模拟。结果:研究评估了稳定器配合元件的磨料磨损。力学试验表明,随着载荷循环次数的增加,观察到的力增加(11.74±2.52 N)。显微鉴定显示帽和杆在两个区域(上和下)磨损。数值模拟结果表明,在标准体系中,最大应力出现在配合元件上,即杆和阀盖上(15.6 MPa)。在改进后的接头中,应力分布不同,主要集中在插片和连杆表面,最大应力值分别为6.0 MPa (PE插片)和12.4 MPa (PEEK插片)。结论:将数值模拟得到的应力分布与力学试验产生的磨粒磨损效应进行比较,发现了类似的机理(稳定器配合元件的顶层破坏)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of frictional wear in a follow-up screw-rod kinematic node in GGS transpedicular stabilization.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the abrasive wear of the sliding screw-rod joint used in growth guidance system (GGS) stabilizers, allowing for the translation of the screw along the rod during the spinal growth process in a standard and modified system. Methods: The study used single kinematic screw-rod pairs made of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Mechanical tests (cyclic loads) simulated the stabilizer's operation under conditions similar to actual use. A microscopic evaluation was conducted, analyzing abrasive wear based on measured abrasion areas. Numerical simulations were performed for the standard joint system and for a structural change (an additional insert to increase contact area between the rod and sliding screw cap). Results: The study evaluated the abrasive wear of the mating elements of the stabilizer. Mechanical tests showed an increase in the force observed (11.74 ± 2.52 N) with the increasing number of load cycles. Microscopic evaluation showed abrasion of the caps and rods in two areas (upper and lower). Numerical simulations indicated the highest stresses in the standard system were on the mating elements, i.e., the rod and the cap (15.6 MPa). In the modified joint, stress distribution differed, concentrating on the surface of the insert and the rod, with maximum values of 6.0 MPa (PE insert) and 12.4 MPa (PEEK insert). Conclusions: Comparing the stress distributions obtained in the numerical simulations and the abrasive wear effects produced in the mechanical tests, a similar mechanism was observed (the destruction of the top layer of the mating elements of the stabilizer).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信