关节镜下Bankart足迹固定技术修复后关节盂前缘吸收及其与修复后关节囊结合体愈合的相关性:计算机断层扫描和磁共振关节成像研究。

Q4 Medicine
Takehito Hirose MD, PhD , Makoto Tanaka MD, PhD , Hidekazu Nakai MD
{"title":"关节镜下Bankart足迹固定技术修复后关节盂前缘吸收及其与修复后关节囊结合体愈合的相关性:计算机断层扫描和磁共振关节成像研究。","authors":"Takehito Hirose MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Makoto Tanaka MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hidekazu Nakai MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Studies have revealed that anterior glenoid rim bone resorption occurs in the early stage after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) if bony Bankart lesions are absent or fail to heal. However, this structural change has never been studied after repair by footprint fixation (FF). Additionally, the relationship between the extent of rim resorption and healing of the repaired capsulolabral complex (CLC) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate anterior glenoid rim changes after ABR by FF and to elucidate the correlation between rim resorption and the healing of the repaired CLC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective study on shoulders that underwent ABR by a combination of knotless twin anchor FF and single row techniques for anterior shoulder instability from January 2022 to June 2023. From 44 shoulders, we included 23 after excluding 14 with preoperative bony Bankart lesions and 7 with missing postoperative imaging. We used 3-dimensional computed tomography scans to calculate the change in glenoid width (Δ%) due to anterior glenoid rim change from baseline to 3 months postoperatively and images from magnetic resonance arthrography, which was performed at around 5 months postoperatively, to evaluate CLC healing according to a 3-point grading scale (<em>good</em>, 3 points; <em>fair</em>, 2 points; <em>poor</em>, 1 point) on 6 oblique axial slices perpendicular to the glenoid long axis. Finally, we calculated the correlation coefficient between Δ% and the healing index, that is, the mean CLC healing grade of the 6 slices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Glenoid width decreased by 7.2% (range, 2.0%-12.8%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The mean CLC healing index was 2.59 points (range, 1.8-3.0). The Δ% showed a moderate positive correlation with the healing index (correlation coefficient, 0.55; <em>P</em> = .006).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Anterior glenoid rim resorption also occurs after ABR by the combination of FF and single row technique at 3 months postoperatively. Although this is a preliminary result, the extent of rim resorption is greater with better healing of the repaired CLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterior glenoid rim resorption after arthroscopic Bankart repair by the footprint fixation technique and its correlation with the healing of the repaired capsulolabral complex: a computed tomography and magnetic resonance arthrography imaging study\",\"authors\":\"Takehito Hirose MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Makoto Tanaka MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hidekazu Nakai MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Studies have revealed that anterior glenoid rim bone resorption occurs in the early stage after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) if bony Bankart lesions are absent or fail to heal. However, this structural change has never been studied after repair by footprint fixation (FF). Additionally, the relationship between the extent of rim resorption and healing of the repaired capsulolabral complex (CLC) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate anterior glenoid rim changes after ABR by FF and to elucidate the correlation between rim resorption and the healing of the repaired CLC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective study on shoulders that underwent ABR by a combination of knotless twin anchor FF and single row techniques for anterior shoulder instability from January 2022 to June 2023. From 44 shoulders, we included 23 after excluding 14 with preoperative bony Bankart lesions and 7 with missing postoperative imaging. We used 3-dimensional computed tomography scans to calculate the change in glenoid width (Δ%) due to anterior glenoid rim change from baseline to 3 months postoperatively and images from magnetic resonance arthrography, which was performed at around 5 months postoperatively, to evaluate CLC healing according to a 3-point grading scale (<em>good</em>, 3 points; <em>fair</em>, 2 points; <em>poor</em>, 1 point) on 6 oblique axial slices perpendicular to the glenoid long axis. Finally, we calculated the correlation coefficient between Δ% and the healing index, that is, the mean CLC healing grade of the 6 slices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Glenoid width decreased by 7.2% (range, 2.0%-12.8%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The mean CLC healing index was 2.59 points (range, 1.8-3.0). The Δ% showed a moderate positive correlation with the healing index (correlation coefficient, 0.55; <em>P</em> = .006).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Anterior glenoid rim resorption also occurs after ABR by the combination of FF and single row technique at 3 months postoperatively. Although this is a preliminary result, the extent of rim resorption is greater with better healing of the repaired CLC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 46-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124001226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124001226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明,如果骨Bankart损伤缺失或不能愈合,关节镜下Bankart修复(ABR)后早期会发生前盂缘骨吸收。然而,这种结构变化从未被研究过修复后的足迹固定(FF)。此外,边缘吸收程度与修复后的囊状复合体(CLC)愈合之间的关系尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在探讨FF ABR术后盂前缘的变化,阐明盂前缘吸收与修复后CLC愈合的关系。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,从2022年1月至2023年6月,肩关节前路不稳定采用无节双锚FF和单排技术联合进行ABR。从44个肩部中,我们剔除了14个术前骨Bankart病变和7个术后影像缺失的肩部,纳入了23个。我们使用三维计算机断层扫描来计算从基线到术后3个月由于前盂边缘变化导致的盂宽变化(Δ%),并使用磁共振关节摄影图像,在术后5个月左右进行,根据3分分级量表评估CLC愈合(良好,3分;公平,2分;差,1点)上6斜轴片垂直于关节盂长轴。最后,我们计算Δ%与愈合指数的相关系数,即6片CLC的平均愈合等级。结果:关节盂宽度减小7.2%(幅度2.0% ~ 12.8%;P < 0.001)。平均愈合指数为2.59分(范围1.8 ~ 3.0)。Δ%与愈合指数呈中度正相关(相关系数0.55;P = .006)。结论:FF联合单排技术ABR术后3个月仍发生前盂缘吸收。虽然这是初步结果,但修复后的CLC愈合较好,边缘吸收的程度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anterior glenoid rim resorption after arthroscopic Bankart repair by the footprint fixation technique and its correlation with the healing of the repaired capsulolabral complex: a computed tomography and magnetic resonance arthrography imaging study

Background

Studies have revealed that anterior glenoid rim bone resorption occurs in the early stage after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) if bony Bankart lesions are absent or fail to heal. However, this structural change has never been studied after repair by footprint fixation (FF). Additionally, the relationship between the extent of rim resorption and healing of the repaired capsulolabral complex (CLC) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate anterior glenoid rim changes after ABR by FF and to elucidate the correlation between rim resorption and the healing of the repaired CLC.

Methods

This was a retrospective study on shoulders that underwent ABR by a combination of knotless twin anchor FF and single row techniques for anterior shoulder instability from January 2022 to June 2023. From 44 shoulders, we included 23 after excluding 14 with preoperative bony Bankart lesions and 7 with missing postoperative imaging. We used 3-dimensional computed tomography scans to calculate the change in glenoid width (Δ%) due to anterior glenoid rim change from baseline to 3 months postoperatively and images from magnetic resonance arthrography, which was performed at around 5 months postoperatively, to evaluate CLC healing according to a 3-point grading scale (good, 3 points; fair, 2 points; poor, 1 point) on 6 oblique axial slices perpendicular to the glenoid long axis. Finally, we calculated the correlation coefficient between Δ% and the healing index, that is, the mean CLC healing grade of the 6 slices.

Results

Glenoid width decreased by 7.2% (range, 2.0%-12.8%; P < .001). The mean CLC healing index was 2.59 points (range, 1.8-3.0). The Δ% showed a moderate positive correlation with the healing index (correlation coefficient, 0.55; P = .006).

Conclusion

Anterior glenoid rim resorption also occurs after ABR by the combination of FF and single row technique at 3 months postoperatively. Although this is a preliminary result, the extent of rim resorption is greater with better healing of the repaired CLC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信