乳糜泻的远程医疗:受教育程度较低和家庭收入较低的患者更喜欢亲自预约。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Yvonne Jeanes, Lidia Orlandi, Humayun Muhammad, Sue Reeves
{"title":"乳糜泻的远程医疗:受教育程度较低和家庭收入较低的患者更喜欢亲自预约。","authors":"Yvonne Jeanes,&nbsp;Lidia Orlandi,&nbsp;Humayun Muhammad,&nbsp;Sue Reeves","doi":"10.1111/jhn.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>A gluten-free (GF) diet, the only treatment for people living with coeliac disease (CD), is challenging, and international guidelines highlight the valuable role of healthcare professionals in enabling self-management. The study aimed to explore the acceptability of telephone and online video consultations for adults with CD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study consisting of an online and paper survey was promoted to adults with CD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data from 496 adults with CD (87% female, 96% White) are presented, and 44% were adhering to the GF diet. Over half (58%) were very confident in understanding food labels from supermarkets, whereas only 38% were very confident when shopping online. The largest proportion of patients preferred in-person healthcare appointments for CD (44%), with 20% reporting no preference and 21% preferring telephone appointments. Only 15% preferred online video consultations; of these, 97% were confident with online technology. A higher proportion of patients from a lower household income requested ‘in-person’ appointments compared with those with a higher income (65% vs. 45% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01)). Likewise, 58% of patients without a degree qualification requested ‘in-person’ appointments compared with 45% of degree-educated patients (<i>p</i> = 0.027).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We highlight a significant proportion of adults with CD prefer an in-person appointment. The paper survey enabled the views of a broader range of digitally confident patients to contribute to the study. With a global shift towards telemedicine and online resources, access and digital literacy is an important consideration for equitable healthcare to optimize patient self-management of the GF diet.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine in Coeliac Disease: In-Person Appointments Are Favoured by Patients With a Lower Education Attainment and Lower Household Income\",\"authors\":\"Yvonne Jeanes,&nbsp;Lidia Orlandi,&nbsp;Humayun Muhammad,&nbsp;Sue Reeves\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jhn.70014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>A gluten-free (GF) diet, the only treatment for people living with coeliac disease (CD), is challenging, and international guidelines highlight the valuable role of healthcare professionals in enabling self-management. The study aimed to explore the acceptability of telephone and online video consultations for adults with CD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional study consisting of an online and paper survey was promoted to adults with CD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data from 496 adults with CD (87% female, 96% White) are presented, and 44% were adhering to the GF diet. Over half (58%) were very confident in understanding food labels from supermarkets, whereas only 38% were very confident when shopping online. The largest proportion of patients preferred in-person healthcare appointments for CD (44%), with 20% reporting no preference and 21% preferring telephone appointments. Only 15% preferred online video consultations; of these, 97% were confident with online technology. A higher proportion of patients from a lower household income requested ‘in-person’ appointments compared with those with a higher income (65% vs. 45% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01)). Likewise, 58% of patients without a degree qualification requested ‘in-person’ appointments compared with 45% of degree-educated patients (<i>p</i> = 0.027).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We highlight a significant proportion of adults with CD prefer an in-person appointment. The paper survey enabled the views of a broader range of digitally confident patients to contribute to the study. With a global shift towards telemedicine and online resources, access and digital literacy is an important consideration for equitable healthcare to optimize patient self-management of the GF diet.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773122/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无谷蛋白(GF)饮食是乳糜泻(CD)患者的唯一治疗方法,具有挑战性,国际指南强调了医疗保健专业人员在实现自我管理方面的重要作用。该研究旨在探讨电话和在线视频咨询对患有CD的成年人的可接受性。方法:一项由在线和纸质调查组成的横断面研究推广到患有CD的成年人。结果:来自496名患有CD的成年人(87%为女性,96%为白人)的数据,其中44%坚持GF饮食。超过一半(58%)的人对超市的食品标签非常有信心,而只有38%的人对网上购物非常有信心。对于乳糜泻,患者首选面对面医疗预约的比例最大(44%),20%的患者表示没有偏好,21%的患者表示更喜欢电话预约。只有15%的人喜欢在线视频咨询;其中,97%的人对在线技术有信心。与收入较高的患者相比,家庭收入较低的患者要求“面对面”预约的比例更高(65%对45%)。结论:我们强调了很大比例的成年乳糜腾腾患者更喜欢面对面预约。论文调查使更广泛的数字自信患者的观点能够为研究做出贡献。随着全球向远程医疗和在线资源的转变,获取和数字素养是公平医疗的一个重要考虑因素,以优化GF饮食的患者自我管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Telemedicine in Coeliac Disease: In-Person Appointments Are Favoured by Patients With a Lower Education Attainment and Lower Household Income

Telemedicine in Coeliac Disease: In-Person Appointments Are Favoured by Patients With a Lower Education Attainment and Lower Household Income

Introduction

A gluten-free (GF) diet, the only treatment for people living with coeliac disease (CD), is challenging, and international guidelines highlight the valuable role of healthcare professionals in enabling self-management. The study aimed to explore the acceptability of telephone and online video consultations for adults with CD.

Methods

A cross-sectional study consisting of an online and paper survey was promoted to adults with CD.

Results

Data from 496 adults with CD (87% female, 96% White) are presented, and 44% were adhering to the GF diet. Over half (58%) were very confident in understanding food labels from supermarkets, whereas only 38% were very confident when shopping online. The largest proportion of patients preferred in-person healthcare appointments for CD (44%), with 20% reporting no preference and 21% preferring telephone appointments. Only 15% preferred online video consultations; of these, 97% were confident with online technology. A higher proportion of patients from a lower household income requested ‘in-person’ appointments compared with those with a higher income (65% vs. 45% (p < 0.01)). Likewise, 58% of patients without a degree qualification requested ‘in-person’ appointments compared with 45% of degree-educated patients (p = 0.027).

Conclusions

We highlight a significant proportion of adults with CD prefer an in-person appointment. The paper survey enabled the views of a broader range of digitally confident patients to contribute to the study. With a global shift towards telemedicine and online resources, access and digital literacy is an important consideration for equitable healthcare to optimize patient self-management of the GF diet.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信