按基线息肉组别、解剖部位和性别分列的内窥镜筛查后队列中的长期结直肠癌发病率(考虑到监测)。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emma C Robbins, Kate Wooldrage, Brian P Saunders, Amanda J Cross
{"title":"按基线息肉组别、解剖部位和性别分列的内窥镜筛查后队列中的长期结直肠癌发病率(考虑到监测)。","authors":"Emma C Robbins, Kate Wooldrage, Brian P Saunders, Amanda J Cross","doi":"10.1177/09691413251316442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Colonoscopy surveillance is often performed in post-polypectomy cohorts, likely altering colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes, but this is often not addressed in CRC incidence analyses. We examined CRC incidence post-endoscopic screening, accounting for surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial participants who had no, low-risk, or high-risk (≥10 mm, ≥3 adenomas, adenomas with villous features/high-grade dysplasia) distal polyps at screening. Participants with high-risk polyps had an index colonoscopy and 81% had ≥1 surveillance colonoscopies post-screening; <1% of those with no/low-risk polyps had an index or surveillance colonoscopy. We examined CRC incidence over 21 years by anatomic subsite and sex. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) compared incidence to general population incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 39,417 participants, 29,792 (76%), 8162 (21%), and 1463 (4%) had no, low-risk, and high-risk polyps, respectively. In the high-risk group, all-site CRC incidence was non-significantly different from that in the general population, when including all participants, just those who attended surveillance, or just those who did not attend surveillance (SIRs: 0.81 [95% confidence interval: 0.60-1.07]; 0.75 [0.54-1.03]; 1.12 [0.56-2.01], respectively). Without surveillance, compared to the general population, distal cancer incidence was lower among women and men without polyps (SIRs: 0.30 [0.24-0.37]; 0.24 [0.20-0.29], respectively) and women and men with low-risk polyps (SIRs: 0.52 [0.34-0.76]; 0.27 [0.19-0.37], respectively); proximal cancer incidence was lower among men without polyps (SIR: 0.75 [0.64-0.88]), non-significantly different among women without polyps (SIR: 1.07 [0.93-1.22]) and men with low-risk polyps (SIR: 1.22 [0.98-1.51]), but higher among women with low-risk polyps (SIR: 2.22 [1.77-2.76]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with low-risk distal polyps at flexible sigmoidoscopy screening had double the risk of proximal colon cancer, compared to the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413251316442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term colorectal cancer incidence in a post-endoscopic screening cohort, accounting for surveillance, by baseline polyp group, anatomic subsite, and sex.\",\"authors\":\"Emma C Robbins, Kate Wooldrage, Brian P Saunders, Amanda J Cross\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09691413251316442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Colonoscopy surveillance is often performed in post-polypectomy cohorts, likely altering colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes, but this is often not addressed in CRC incidence analyses. We examined CRC incidence post-endoscopic screening, accounting for surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial participants who had no, low-risk, or high-risk (≥10 mm, ≥3 adenomas, adenomas with villous features/high-grade dysplasia) distal polyps at screening. Participants with high-risk polyps had an index colonoscopy and 81% had ≥1 surveillance colonoscopies post-screening; <1% of those with no/low-risk polyps had an index or surveillance colonoscopy. We examined CRC incidence over 21 years by anatomic subsite and sex. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) compared incidence to general population incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 39,417 participants, 29,792 (76%), 8162 (21%), and 1463 (4%) had no, low-risk, and high-risk polyps, respectively. In the high-risk group, all-site CRC incidence was non-significantly different from that in the general population, when including all participants, just those who attended surveillance, or just those who did not attend surveillance (SIRs: 0.81 [95% confidence interval: 0.60-1.07]; 0.75 [0.54-1.03]; 1.12 [0.56-2.01], respectively). Without surveillance, compared to the general population, distal cancer incidence was lower among women and men without polyps (SIRs: 0.30 [0.24-0.37]; 0.24 [0.20-0.29], respectively) and women and men with low-risk polyps (SIRs: 0.52 [0.34-0.76]; 0.27 [0.19-0.37], respectively); proximal cancer incidence was lower among men without polyps (SIR: 0.75 [0.64-0.88]), non-significantly different among women without polyps (SIR: 1.07 [0.93-1.22]) and men with low-risk polyps (SIR: 1.22 [0.98-1.51]), but higher among women with low-risk polyps (SIR: 2.22 [1.77-2.76]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with low-risk distal polyps at flexible sigmoidoscopy screening had double the risk of proximal colon cancer, compared to the general population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9691413251316442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251316442\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251316442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:结肠镜检查经常在息肉切除术后的人群中进行,可能会改变结直肠癌(CRC)的结局,但这在CRC发病率分析中往往没有得到解决。我们检查了内镜筛查后的CRC发病率,并考虑了监测。方法:我们检查了英国柔性乙状结肠镜筛查试验的参与者,他们在筛查时没有、低风险或高风险(≥10 mm、≥3个腺瘤、腺瘤伴绒毛状特征/高度发育不良)远端息肉。高风险息肉患者筛查后进行了指数结肠镜检查,81%的患者进行了≥1次监测结肠镜检查;结果:在39,417名参与者中,分别有29,792名(76%),8162名(21%)和1463名(4%)患有无、低风险和高风险息肉。在高危人群中,当包括所有参与者、仅参加监测的参与者或仅未参加监测的参与者时,全部位CRC发病率与一般人群无显著差异(SIRs: 0.81[95%置信区间:0.60-1.07];0.75 (0.54 - -1.03);1.12[0.56-2.01])。在没有监测的情况下,与一般人群相比,没有息肉的女性和男性远端癌症发病率较低(SIRs: 0.30 [0.24-0.37];分别为0.24[0.20-0.29])和低危性息肉的男女(SIRs: 0.52 [0.34-0.76];0.27 [0.19-0.37]);无息肉男性的近端癌发病率较低(SIR: 0.75[0.64-0.88]),无息肉女性(SIR: 1.07[0.93-1.22])和低危息肉男性(SIR: 1.22[0.98-1.51])的近端癌发病率无显著差异,而低危息肉女性的近端癌发病率较高(SIR: 2.22[1.77-2.76])。结论:柔性乙状结肠镜筛查低风险远端息肉的女性患近端结肠癌的风险是一般人群的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term colorectal cancer incidence in a post-endoscopic screening cohort, accounting for surveillance, by baseline polyp group, anatomic subsite, and sex.

Objectives: Colonoscopy surveillance is often performed in post-polypectomy cohorts, likely altering colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes, but this is often not addressed in CRC incidence analyses. We examined CRC incidence post-endoscopic screening, accounting for surveillance.

Methods: We examined UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial participants who had no, low-risk, or high-risk (≥10 mm, ≥3 adenomas, adenomas with villous features/high-grade dysplasia) distal polyps at screening. Participants with high-risk polyps had an index colonoscopy and 81% had ≥1 surveillance colonoscopies post-screening; <1% of those with no/low-risk polyps had an index or surveillance colonoscopy. We examined CRC incidence over 21 years by anatomic subsite and sex. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) compared incidence to general population incidence.

Results: Of 39,417 participants, 29,792 (76%), 8162 (21%), and 1463 (4%) had no, low-risk, and high-risk polyps, respectively. In the high-risk group, all-site CRC incidence was non-significantly different from that in the general population, when including all participants, just those who attended surveillance, or just those who did not attend surveillance (SIRs: 0.81 [95% confidence interval: 0.60-1.07]; 0.75 [0.54-1.03]; 1.12 [0.56-2.01], respectively). Without surveillance, compared to the general population, distal cancer incidence was lower among women and men without polyps (SIRs: 0.30 [0.24-0.37]; 0.24 [0.20-0.29], respectively) and women and men with low-risk polyps (SIRs: 0.52 [0.34-0.76]; 0.27 [0.19-0.37], respectively); proximal cancer incidence was lower among men without polyps (SIR: 0.75 [0.64-0.88]), non-significantly different among women without polyps (SIR: 1.07 [0.93-1.22]) and men with low-risk polyps (SIR: 1.22 [0.98-1.51]), but higher among women with low-risk polyps (SIR: 2.22 [1.77-2.76]).

Conclusions: Women with low-risk distal polyps at flexible sigmoidoscopy screening had double the risk of proximal colon cancer, compared to the general population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信